Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2011 | 4(18) | 5-25

Article title

Wprowadzenie do ekonomicznej analizy prawa w odniesieniu do prawa o zobowiązaniach umownych oraz do polityki regulacyjnej państwa

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
An Introduction to Law and Economics with Applications to Contract Law and Governmental Regulation

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Esej rozpoczyna się od krótkiej prezentacji ekonomicznej analizy prawa jako dyscypliny naukowej, podane są przykłady różnic między ekonomiczną analizą prawa i tzw. analizą doktrynalną. Następnie omówione zostają dwa najważniejsze nurty badawcze w dziedzinie będącej przedmiotem szczególnego zainteresowania autora - wykorzystywanie pojęć zaczerpniętych z ekonomii behawioralnej do analizy prawa oraz rozwój empirycznych badań przepisów prawa. Po wyjaśnieniu, dlaczego są one tak ważne, autor przedstawia przykłady znaczących różnic między wnioskami, do których dochodzą przedstawiciele nowych nurtów myślenia, a interpretacjami proponowanymi przez zwolenników bardziej tradycyjnego podejścia do zagadnień prawa, a także omawia ich wpływ na politykę prawną i regulacyjną.
EN
The author starts his essay with a brief overview of law and economics as a research discipline and offers examples of how its analysis differs from that of doctrinal analysis, an older style of legal analysis. Next, he focuses on what he considers to be the two most important developments in the area - the incorporation of behavioural economics into the analysis of law and the emergence of empirical legal studies. After explaining why he considers them to be of such importance, he gives examples of how the legal and regulatory policies suggested by these developments significantly differ from the previous ones.

Contributors

References

  • Abramowicz M., Ayres I., Listokin Y., 2009, Randomizing Law, "University of Pennsylvania Law Review", nr 159.
  • Bar-Gill O., 2008, The Behavioral Economics of Consumer Contracts, "Minnesota Law Review", nr 92 Barr M.S., Mullainathan S., Shafir E., 2009, The Case for Behaviorally Informed Regulation [w:] New Perspectives on Regulation, eds. Moss D., Cisternino J., The Tobin Project, Cambridge.
  • Camerer C., Issacharoff S., Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T, Rabin M., 2003, Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for Asymmetric Paternalism, "University of Pennsylvania Law Review", nr 151.
  • Cooter R., Ulen T.S., Law and Economics, Prentice-Hall, Boston 2011.
  • Cross F.B., 2011, Tort Law and the U.S. Economy, "Minnesota Law Review", nr 96.
  • Donohue J.J. III, Levitt S.D., 2001, The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime, "Quarterly Journal of Economics", nr 116.
  • Donohue J.J. III, Wolfers J., 2005, "Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate, "Stanford Law Review", nr 58.
  • Epstein R., 2008, The Neo-Classical Economics of Consumer Contracts, "Minnesota Law Review", nr 92.
  • Farber D., 2008, Modeling Climate Change and Its Impacts: Law, Policy, and Science, "Texas Law Review", nr 86.
  • Galanter M., 2004, The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts, "Journal of Employment Legal Studies", nr l.
  • Garoupa N., Ulen T.S., 2007, The Market for Legal Innovation: Law and Economics in Europe and the United States, University of Illinois Law and Economic Research Paper nr LE07-009, University of Illinois, Chicago.
  • Gilson R.A., 1984, Value Creation by Business Lawyers: Legal Skills and Asset Pricing, "Yale Law Journal", nr 94.
  • Gneezy U., Rustichini A., 2000, A Fine is a Price, "Journal of Legal Studies", nr 29.
  • Holmes O.W., 1897, The Path of the Law, "Harvard Law Review", nr 10.
  • Johnson E.J., Goldstein D., 2003, Do Defaults Save Lives?, "Science", nr 302.
  • Kahneman D., 2003, Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics, "American Economic Review", nr 93.
  • Kaplow L., Shavell S., Fairness Versus Welfare, Harvard University Press, Cambridge-London 2006.
  • Korobkin R.B., Ulen T.S., 2000, Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics, "California Law Review", nr 88.
  • Lawless R.M., Robbennolt J.K., Ulen T.S., Empirical Methods in Law, Aspen Publishers, New York 2010.
  • Levitt S.D., 2004, Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors that Explain the Decline and Six that Do Not, "Journal of Economic Perspectives", nr 18.
  • Levitt S.D., Miles T.J., 2007 , Empirical Study of Criminal Punishment [w:] Handbook of Law and Economics, vol. 1, eds. Polinsky A.M., Shavell S., Elsevier, Amsterdam-London.
  • Orentlicher D., 2009, Presumed Consent to Organ Donation: Its Rise and Fall in the United States, "Rutgers Law Review", vol. 61.
  • Perillo J.M., 2000, Misreading Oliver Wendell Holmes on Efficient Breach and Tortious Interference, "Fordham Law Review", vol. 68.
  • Posner E., Sunstein C.R., 2007, Climate Change Justice, "Georgetown Law Journal", vol. 96.
  • Posner R.A., Economic Analysis of Law, Aspen Publishers, New York 2010.
  • Robinson P.H., Darley J.M., 2004, Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioral Science Investigation, "Oxford Journal of Legal Studies", vol. 24.
  • Silver C.M., 2002, Does Civil Justice Cost too Much?", "Texas Law Review", vol. 80.
  • Sourcebook on Criminal Justice Statistics, http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook.
  • Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R., Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Yale University Press, New Haven 2008.
  • Tietenberg T., 2003, The Tradable Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: Lessons for Climate Change, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", vol. 19.
  • Ulen T.S., Behavioral Law and Economics: Law, Policy, and Science, "The Supreme Court Economic Review" (w druku).
  • Ulen T.S., 1984, The Efficiency of Specific Performance, "Michigan Law Review", vol. 83.
  • Vandenbergh M.P., Carrico A.R., Schultz-Bressman L., 2011, Regulation in the Behavioral Era, "Minnesota Law Review", vol. 95.
  • Vandenbergh M.P, Steinemann A.C., 2007, The Carbon-Neutral Individual, "NYU Law Review", vol. 82.
  • West R.F., Meserve R.J., Stanovich K., 2012, Cognitive Sophistication Does Not Attenuate the Bias Blind Spot, "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology", vol. 103, nr (3).
  • Wilkinson-Ryan T., 2010, Do Liquidated Damages Encourage Breach? A Psychological Experiment, "Michigan Law Review", vol. 108.
  • http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahneman.html.
  • https://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome.
  • http://www.hotcoffeethemovie.com/Default.asp.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-1d664eb4-c97c-4377-9dfc-3cba5847e764
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.