Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl



2018 | 4 | 12 | 2001-2010

Article title

Building Users’ Appraisal of Effective Fire Safety Management for Building Facilities in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions: A Pilot Study


Title variants

Languages of publication



Enormous investments had been made in Malaysian education sector of the economy especially in the higher education towards fulfilling a target of creating an attractive environment, conducive to learning and academic excellence. Building facilities account for a significant portion of investments in the sector. Since no building has immunity against fire, it has become imperative to research ways of ensuring the safety of built facilities and users from fire disaster. This research proposed a framework for effective fire safety management for buildings in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions. The report aims to display the results of the pilot study conducted among staff and students from selected universities in Johor Malaysia before carrying out the core survey to collect information from respondents. The pilot study sought to minimise errors in the questionnaire, makes the survey runs smoothly, facilitate the response rate, and provide a useful and valuable inquiry. The results include the descriptive statistics, reliability test, content and construct validity, and the normality test. The summary of the reliability test for each construct of the users’ questionnaire, are Management, 0.910; fire safety equipment/system, 0.907; building components safety design, 0.917. Furthermore, users’ awareness and knowledge of fire safety, 0.948; users’ attitude on fire safety, 0.885 and the effectiveness of fire safety management have a value 0.913 for Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient. The aggregate Descriptive Statistics results for Users/Occupants Questionnaire show mean values between the ranges of 3.34 to 3.76. The questionnaire had low dispersion and standard deviation values of less than 1. The values of skewness and kurtosis were all within the recommended threshold of -/+2, an indication that all the constructs of the study were normally distributed. The results are a favourable indicator for proceeding with the core survey using the instrument.









Physical description




  • Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
  • Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
  • Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
  • Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
  • Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia


  • Abdul Rahim, N., Taib, M., & Othuman Mydin, M. A. (2014). Investigation of Fire Safety Awareness and Management in Mall. MATEC Web of Conferences, 10, 06004. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20141006004
  • Agyekum, K., Ayarkwa, J., & Amoah, P. (2016). Challenges to Fire Safety Management in Multi-Storey Students’ Hostels. Modern Management Science & Engineering, 4(1), 53–61
  • Awang, A. (2014). A handbook on Structural Equation Modelling. Selangor: MPWS.
  • Billington, M. J., Copping, A., & Ferguson, A. (2008). Means of escape from fire. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • British Safety Council. (2017, August). Fire Safety Management Audit. Retrieved from https://www.britsafe.org/media/3754/ma178-fire-safety-audit-spec-v3.pdf
  • Chow, W. K. (2001). Review on fire safety management and application to Hong Kong. International Journal on Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codes, 3(1), 52–58.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2013). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046
  • Ebenehi, I.Y., Mohamed, S., Sarpin, N. (2018). Fire Safety Management for Buildings in Malaysian Universities: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Environmental & Design and Construction Management, 4, 3–7.
  • Fink, A. (2017). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2008). SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference. Boston: Pearson.
  • Gollner, M., Kimball, A., & Vecchiarelli, T. (2012, November). Fire safety design and sustainable buildings: challenges and opportunities. Retrieved from http://www.gollnerfire.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Foundation_Sustainable_Building_Design_Symposium_Proceedings-Final.pdf
  • Hassanain, M. A. (2009). Approaches to qualitative fire safety risk assessment in hotel facilities. Structural Survey, 27(4), 287–300. doi: 10.1108/02630800910985081
  • Hassanain, M. A., Hafeez, M. A., & Sanni-Anibire, M. O. (2017). A ranking system for fire safety performance of student housing facilities. Safety Science, 92, 116–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.002
  • Howarth, D. J., & Kara‐Zaitri, C. (1999). Fire safety management at passenger terminals. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 8(5), 362–369. doi: 10.1108/09653569910298288
  • Hung, Y. C. (2012, September). A Study on the Fire Safety Management of Public Rental Housing in Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://lbms03.cityu.edu.hk/theses/c_ftt/engd-ca-b41999095f.pdf
  • International Code Council. (2018). 2018 International building code. Retrieved from http://shop.iccsafe.org/codes/2018-international-codes-and-references/2018-international-building-code-and-references.html
  • Kironji, M. (2015). Evaluation of Fire Protection Systems in Commercial Highrise Buildings for Fire Safety Optimization: A Case of Nairobi Central Business District. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(10), 1–8.
  • Mathers, N., Fox, N., Hunn, A., & Group, T. (1998). Surveys and Questionnaires. Sheffield: NHS Executive, Trent.
  • Muijs, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research in education with SPSS. London : SAGE Publications.
  • Naziris, I. A., Lagaros, N. D., & Papaioannou, K. (2016). Selection and Resource Allocation Model for Upgrading Fire Safety of Historic Buildings. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(4), 05016004. doi: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000424
  • Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS Survival Manual. Maidenhead : Open University Press.
  • Ramachandran, G. (1999). Fire safety management and risk assessment. Facilities, 17(9/10), 363–377. doi: 10.1108/02632779910278782
  • Sanni-Anibire, M. O., & Hassanain, M. A. (2015). An integrated fire safety assessment of a student housing facility. Structural Survey, 33(4/5), 354–371. doi: 10.1108/ss-03-2015-0017
  • Society of Fire Protection Engineers. (2006). SFPE Engineering Guide to Application of Risk Assessment. Gaithersburg: SFPE.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  • Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., & Qian, C. (2018). System dynamics analysis for petrochemical enterprise fire safety system. Procedia Engineering, 211, 1034–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.107

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.