PL EN


2016 | 4/2016 (64), t.2 | 50 - 61
Article title

Intensity of Network Relationships: Towards Conceptualization and Operationalization

Content
Title variants
PL
Intensywność powiązań sieciowych – w kierunku konceptualizacji i operacjonalizacji
Languages of publication
PL EN
Abstracts
EN
The paper content is embedded in the network paradigm and concerns the intensity of network relationships. The aim of the paper is to conceptualize and initially operationalize the construct “intensity of network relationships”. The aim has been realized through answering the following research questions: (1) How to identify and explore a set of network relationships of a single organization? (2) How to conceptualize and operationalize the extent to which an organization (node organization, network member) is involved or entangled in the inter-organizational network analysed from the ego-network perspective? The conceptualization and operationalization of the construct have been developed by means of a deepened literature study as well as initial case studies performed by the authors. The paper is organized as follows. The first section presents the essence, origins, and perspectives of researching inter-organizational networks. The construct called intensity of network relationships is conceptualized in the second section. Then, the dimensions of network relationship intensity and its operationalization proposal are highlighted. Finally, some conclusions, limitations, and research directions are formulated.
PL
Artykuł mieści się w nurcie badań nad sieciami międzyorganizacyjnymi i dotyczy intensywności powiązań sieciowych. Celem artykułu jest konceptualizacja i próba operacjonalizacji konstruktu „intensywność powiązań sieciowych”. Cel został zrealizowany poprzez próbę odpowiedzi na następujące pytania badawcze: (1) Jak identyfikować i badać sieć powiązań międzyorganizacyjnych pojedynczej organizacji? (2) W jaki sposób ująć i zmierzyć stopień zaangażowania czy uwikłania danej organizacji (organizacja węzłowa, członek sieci) w sieć międzyorganizacyjną? Konceptualizacji i operacjonalizacji omawianego konstruktu dokonano poprzez pogłębione studia literatury i wstępne studia przypadków przeprowadzone przez autorów. Na początku zaprezentowano istotę sieci międzyorganizacyjnych i przywołano wybrane wyniki badań w tym obszarze. Następnie przedstawiono konceptualizację konstruktu – jego ogólny zarys i istotę, a w ostatniej części artykułu wyróżniono wymiary intensywności powiązań sieciowych wraz z próbą wskazania na sposoby ich badania. W zakończeniu sformułowano konkluzje, a także wskazano ograniczenia przeprowadzonej analizy i kierunki dalszych badań.
Year
Pages
50 - 61
Physical description
Dates
published
2016-12-18
Contributors
  • Wrocław University of Economics
  • Wrocław University of Economics
References
  • Adler, P.S. and Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2002.5922314.
  • Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P.H. (1933). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105.
  • Benton, W.C. and Maloni, M. (2005). The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), 1–22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.002.
  • Betz, A.L., Skowronski, J., and Ostrom, T.O. (1996). Shared realities: Social influence and stimulus memory. Social Cognition, 14, 113–40.
  • Borgatti, S.P. and Foster, P.C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management 29(6), 991–1013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00087-4.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). Forms of capital. In: J Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.
  • Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., and Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20159624.
  • Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198288787.001.0001.
  • Chaiklin, H. (2011). Attitudes, behavior, and social practice. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XXXVIII(1), 31–54.
  • Child, J., Faulkner, D., and Tallman, S. (2005). Cooperative Strategy: Managing Alliances, Networks, and Joint Ventures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266241.001.0001.
  • Cho, H. and Kim, D. (2015). The effects of network intensity on unilateral and bilateral control mechanisms. Journal of Marketing Thought, 2(1), 46–51.
  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (supplement), 94–120.
  • Contractor, N.S., Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681–703, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.21318925.
  • Czakon, W. (2005). Istota relacji sieciowych przedsiębiorstw. Przegląd Organizacji, (9), 10–13.
  • Czakon, W. (2011). Paradygmat sieciowy w naukach o zarządzaniu. Przegląd Organizacji, (11), 3–6.
  • Czakon, W. (2012). Sieci w zarządzaniu strategicznym. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer Business.
  • Doz, Y.L. and Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage. The art of creating value through partnering. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Dyer, J.H. and Nobeoka, K (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge- sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–367.
  • Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
  • Eckstein, H.H. (1975). Case studies and theory in political science. In: F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (eds), Handbook of political science (pp. 79–138). Reading: Addison- Wesley.
  • Gargiulo, M. and Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptations of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183–196.
  • Gomes-Casseres, B. (1994). Group versus group: How alliance networks compete. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 62–74.
  • Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/225469.
  • Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619–52, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393756.
  • Gulati, R. and Garigulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439–1493, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/210179.
  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic network. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203–215, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3%3C203::AID-SMJ102%3E3.0.CO;2-K.
  • Gulati, R. and Higgins, M.C. (2003). Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 127–144, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.287.
  • Häcki, R., and Lighton, J. (2001). The future of the networked company. McKinsey Quarterly, (3), 26–39.
  • Jack, S.L. (2005). The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Management Science, 42(6), 1233–1259, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00540.x.
  • Jap, S.D. and Ganesan, S. (2000). Control mechanism and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 227–245.
  • Jarillo, J.C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31–41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090104.
  • Johnston, W.J. (1981). Patterns in Industrial Buying Behaviour. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Karpacz J. (2014). Oportunizm w relacjach międzyorganizacyjnych w teorii i praktyce, Prace Naukowe UE we Wrocławiu, 366, 236–247.
  • Kim, J.I., Howard, M., Pahnke, E.C., and Boeker, W. (2016). Understanding network formation in strategy research: Exponential random graph models. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1), 22–44, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2454.
  • Kontinen, T. and Ojala, A. (2011). Network ties in the international opportunity recognition of family SMEs. International Business Review, 20, 440–453, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.08.002.
  • Lavie, D. (2007), Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12), 1187–1212.
  • Lorenzoni, G. and Baden-Fuller, Ch. (1995). Creating a strategic centre to manage a web of partners. California Management Review, 37(3), 146–163, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165803.
  • McFadyen, A., Semadeni, M., and Cannella, A.A., Jr. (2009). Value of strong ties to disconnected others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organization Science, 20(3), 552–564, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0388.
  • Michelfelder, I. and Kratzer, J. (2013). Why and how combining strong and weak ties within a single interorganizational R&D collaboration outperforms other collaboration structures. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1159–1177, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12052.
  • Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–66.
  • Niemczyk, J. (2013). Strategia. Od planu do sieci. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
  • Niemczyk, J., Organa, M., and Piórkowska, K. (2012). Mechanizmy zarządzania sieciami międzyorganizacyjnymi. In: J. Niemczyk, E. Stańczyk-Hugiet and B. Jasiński (eds), Sieci międzyorganizacyjne. Współczesne wyzwanie dla teorii i praktyki zarządzania (pp. 207–248). Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
  • Ojala, A. (2009). Internationalization of knowledge-intensive SMEs: The role of network relationships in the entry to a psychically distant market. International Business Review, 18(1), 50–59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.10.002.
  • Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relations: integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1990.4308156.
  • Oliver, A. and Ebers, M. (1998). Networking network studies: An analysis of conceptual configurations in the study of interorganizational relationships. Organization Studies, 19(4), 549–583, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/017084069801900402.
  • Park, S.H. and Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 455 77, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.167.
  • Parkhe, A., Wasserman, S., and Ralston, D.A. (2006). New frontiers in network theory development. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 560–568, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.21318917.
  • Piórkowska, K. and Lichtarski, J.M. (2016). Inter-organizational Network and Organizational Strategy: A Conceptual Framework. In: K.S. Soliman (ed.), Proceedings of The 27th International Business Information Management Association Conference: Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth (pp. 2244–2249). International Business Information Management Association.
  • Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.
  • Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-8.50003-4.
  • Ratajczak-Mrozek, M. (2009). Główne cechy relacji sieciowych przedsiębiorstw (podejście sieciowe, network approach). Organizacja i Kierowanie, 4(138), 75–83.
  • Ring, P.S. and Van De Ven, A.H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498.
  • Strużyna, J., Stańczyk-Hugiet, E., and Piórkowska, K. (2015). Krytycznie z perspektywy ewolucyjnej, o tak zwanym otoczeniu organizacji, Prace Naukowe Wałbrzyskiej Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości, (2)32, 411–425.
  • Stuart, T.E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 791–911.
  • Światowiec, R. and Światowiec-Szczepańska, J. (2012). Risk management system in business relationships – Polish case studies. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(5), 790–799.
  • Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M., and Fomburn, Ch. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507–519, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/257851.
  • Thorelli, H.B. (1986). Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37–51, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070105.
  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administration Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393808.
  • Verba, S. (1967). Some dilemmas in comparative research. World Politics, 20(1), 111–127. Williams, T. (2005). Cooperation by design: structure and cooperation in interorganizational networks. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 223–231, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00497-6.
  • Williamson, O.E. (2008). Outsourcing: Transaction cost economics and supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(2), 5–16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00051.x
  • de Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2010). Strategy: Process, Content, Context. An International Perspective. UK: South-Western CENGAGE Learning.
  • Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539–570.
  • Yang, H., Lin, Z., and Peng, M.W. (2011). Behind acquisitions of alliance partners: Exploratory learning and network embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 1069–1080, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.0767.
  • Zaheer, A. and Soda, G. (2009). Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 1–31, http://dx.doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.1.
  • Zaheer, A., Gözübüyük, R., and Milanov, H. (2010). It’s the connection: The network perspective in interorganizational research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2, 62–77, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.50304417.
  • Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. (2015). Strategie przedsiębiorstw w sieci. Wyniki badań firm high-tech. In: R. Krupski (ed.), Zarządzanie strategiczne. Strategie sieci i przedsiębiorstw w sieci. Prace Naukowe Wałbrzyskiej Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości, 32, 439–457.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
1644-9584
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-1ea1ff9d-3dd8-468d-bd3e-7dee5b988300
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.