IJOLS 2018 | 4(2) | 77-89
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
The use of dogmatic-legal, empirical and linguistic semantics methodology is focused on sharing for better understanding of the law. Therefore, views on European jurisprudence have been presented in the paper. Without a doubt, the law-making nature of European Union law takes into account the field of environmental protection. Articles in law define the tasks that are important from the point of view of European legislation. The written nature of these determinants of the reasoning of the possibilities of environmental protection plays an important role in the interpretation of environmental law.
Wykorzystanie metodologii dogmatyczno-prawnej, empirycznej i językowej w semantykach polega na dzieleniu się w celu lepszego zrozumienia prawa. W związku z tym przedstawiono poglądy na temat europejskiego orzecznictwa. Bez wątpienia, prawo stanowienia prawa Unii Europejskiej uwzględnia dziedzinę ochrony środowiska. Artykuły prawne definiują zadania ważne z punktu widzenia prawodawstwa europejskiego. Pisemny charakter tych determinant rozumowania o możliwościach ochrony środowiska odgrywają ważną rolę w interpretacji prawa ochrony środowiska.
  • University of Maria Skłodowska-Curie in Lublin
  • 1. ARNULL A., (2006). The European Union and its Court of Justice, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 2. BARAN M., (2014). Application from the European Union law office by national courts, Warsaw.
  • 3. BARCZ J., (2008). European Union at the crossroads. Dynamics and main directions of the reform of the political system Treaty of Nice Constitutional Treaty Treaty of Lisbon, p.268, Warsaw.
  • 4. BRODECKI Z., KONCEWICZ T., KUPCZYK P., PCHAŁEKM., (2010) Protection of nature against European Court of Justice. Commentary, p.231, Brands.
  • 5. CZAPLIŃSKI W., OSTRIHANSKY R., WYROZUMSKA A., (1994). Law of the European Communities, Documents and Jurisprudence, Warsaw.
  • 6. CZAPLIŃSKI W., OSTRIHANSKY R., SAGANEK P., WYROZUMSKAA., (2005). Law of the European Communities. Jurisprudence. New edition with Suplement, Warsaw 2005.
  • 7. DAHL M., (2018). Ordolireal Roots of Ecological Market Economy, “Review of Economic and Business Studies”, 11, DOI: 10.1515/rebs-2018-0077.
  • 8. DONNER R., (1998). Ruth Donner, International Adjudication: Using the international Court of Justice with special reference to Finland, p.144, Helsinki.
  • 9. DUDZIKS., PÓŁTORAKN., (2013). European Union law and the constitutional law of the Member States, p. 13 Warsaw.
  • 10. GAJOCH H., (2010). Council Office. Support for the work of the council and committees, MUNICIPIUM SA, Warsaw.
  • 11. HAMBURA S., MUSZYŃSKI M., (2001). Treaty on European Union with commentary, vol. I, Bielsko-Biała.
  • 12. HAMBURA S., MUSZYŃSKI M., (2001). Treaty establishing the European Community with commentary, volume II, p. 416, Bielsko-Biała.
  • 13. HASSOON W.H., DZIKI D., (2018). The effect of seed moisture and temperature on grinding characteristics of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
  • 14. JAROSZ M., (2014). Polish or national poland, Institute of Political Studies PAS, p.62, Warsaw 2014.
  • 15. JASIŃSKI F., (2003). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, p. 302, Warsaw.
  • 16. JAŚKOWSKI M., (2016). Judicial review of the legality of administrative acts of the European Union, p. 213, Warsaw.
  • 17. JUSTYŃSKI J., (2004). Legal basis of economic policies of the European Union against the background of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice, Toruń.
  • 18. KAŁA M., LECH T., Preparation of material for research, p. 149, in: Forensic analysis. Selected issues. KAŁA M., WILKD., WÓJCIKIEWICZ J., (2017). Wolters Kluwer, Warsaw.
  • 19. KARABINOŠ M., The principle of subsidiary, its legal regulation in the European Law and its review of compliance, p.112, in: The principle of subsidiarity. The European, national, regional and local dimension, PAWŁOWSKA A., GRABOWSKA S.,(2011). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, Rzeszów.
  • 20. KOWALCZYK R., (2007). Image of the European Union in the Polish press (on the example of "Rzeczpospolita"), p.26, in: the Eastern Dimension of the EU. Multidimensionality of the integrating Europe, STASZCZYK A., JARTYS J., Szczecin.
  • 21. KOWNACKI T., (2014). Legitimizing the political system of the European Union, p. 148, Warsaw.
  • 22. LANGACKER R.,W., (2016). Nominal Structure in Cognitive Grammar, The Lublin Lectures Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press, Lublin.
  • 23. LENAERTS K., (2008). The foreword was written by Professor Koen Lenaerts, Judge of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Luxembourg, in: Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz, Community Procedural Code, Community Procedural Code, p.5, Warsaw 2008.
  • 24. MALINOWSKAI.,(2013). Legal protection authorities in European countries. Systemic and comparative approach, Warsaw.
  • 25. MICHOŃSKI A., (2006). Poland's accession to the European Union. Accession negotiations. A set of documents, Warsaw.
  • 26. MIK C., CZAPLIŃSKI W., (2005). Treaty on European Union. Commentary, p.64, Warsaw.
  • 27. NAFZIGER J., (2016).Trading and Returning Cultural Objects under International Law, Santander Art and Culture Law Review 2/2016 (2): 179- 194, LEX
  • 28. NICOLL W.W., SALMONT.C., (2002). Understanding the European Union, Understanding the European Union , Book and Knowledge, p. 63, Warsaw 2002.
  • 29. NOWACKI M., PRZYBOROWSKA-KLIMCZAK A., (2012). TITLE XX ENVIRONMENT, International cooperation of the European Union and the Member States in the field of the environment (art.191 paragraph 4 TFEU), p. 1301, in: The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. II. LEX commentary, WRÓBEL, A., (2012). LEX Wolters Kluwer business, Warsaw.
  • 30. PODRAZA A., (2007). European Union in the process of treaty reforms, p. 654, Lublin.
  • 31. PÓŁTORAK N., (2005). Wpływ orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości na krajowe środki ochrony prawnej, s.24, Centrum Europejskie Natolin, Warszawa. za VAN GERVEN W., (2000). Of rights, remedies, and procedures, CMLRev.37: 501-
  • 536,2000,s.521. Zob.także PRECHAL, S., SHELKOPLYAS, N., National procedures, public policy and EC law. From van Schijndel to Eco Swiss and beyond, ERPL 5-2004 589-611
  • 32. PÓŁTORAK N., (2010). Protection of rights resulting from European Union law in domestic proceedings, Warsaw.
  • 33. RAKOCZY B., SZUMA K., (2013). Norme in matter ambientale- Codice dell 'ambiente, Warsaw 2013.
  • 34. WĘC, J.J., (2016), Treaty of Lisbon. Political aspects of the reform of the political system of the European Union in 2007-2015, p. 31, Academic bookstore, Krakow.
  • 35. WRÓBELA., (2005). Application of European Union law by the Courts, p. 218, Zakamycze.
  • 36. WRÓBEL A., (2013). Charter of Fundamental Rights European Union. Commentary edited by Prof. Andrzej Wróbel, Warsaw.
  • 37. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union z dnia 1 grudnia 2009r. (Dz.U.2004.90.864 / 2)
  • 38. COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/1984 of 24 October 2017 determining, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No [...] of the European Parliament and of the Council 517/2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases, reference values for the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2020 for each producer or importer who legally placed on the market hydrofluorocarbons from 1 January 2015 notified in accordance with this Regulation (notified under document C (2017) 7080), notes what is subject to quantitative limits of at least 100 tonnesequivalent CO2 hydrofluorocarbons per year by manufacturers or importers.
  • 39.
  • 40. en
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.