2015 | 15 | 1 | 48-61
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
Interest in Web-based and computer-assisted language testing is growing in the field of English for academic purposes (EAP). In this study, four groups of undergraduate EAP students (n=120), each group consisted of 30 students, were randomly selected from four different disciplines, i.e. biology, political sciences, psychology, and law. The four groups were homogeneous regarding their English proficiency. Four course-specific web-based tests of academic vocabulary were administered to each group with regard to their specific disciplines. Questionnaires were employed to explore the EAP students’ perceptions and self-efficacy concerning web-based language testing. Also, the perceptions of the four groups of undergraduates were compared in order to identify the differences among their attitudes. The findings would have implications for renewing assessment approaches and methods used in EAP instruction.
Physical description
  • Alderson, C. (2001). Learning-centred assessment using information technology. Symposium conducted at the 23rd Annual Language Testing Reserach Colloquium, St. Louis, MO.
  • Bachman, L. F., Carr, N., Kamei, G., Kim, M., Llosa, L., Sawaki, Y., Shin, S., Sohn, S-O., Vongpumivitch, V., Wang, L., Xi, X., & Yessis, D. (2000, March). Developing a web-based language placement examination system. Poster session presented at the 22nd Annual Language Testing Research Colloquium, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Boo, J. (1997) Computerized versus Paper-and-pencil Assessment of Educational Development: Score Comparability and Examinee Preferences. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Iowa.
  • Bresolin, Jr., M. J. (1984). A Comparative Study of Computer Administration of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in an Inpatient Psychiatric Setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Loyola University, Chicago.
  • Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing Languages for Specific Purposes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dashtestani, R. (2014a). English as a foreign language—teachers’ perspectives on implementing online instruction in the Iranian EFL context. Research in Learning Technology, 22. 1-15. doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.20142
  • Dashtestani, R. (2014b). An analysis of English for academic purposes students’ use of Wikipedia as a resource for learning academic English. In J.-B. Son (Ed.), Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Learners, Teachers and Tools (pp. 69-96). APACALL Book Series Volume 3. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Ellis, R. (1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meanings. Applied Linguistics, 16, 409-435.
  • Harrel, T., Honaker, M., Hetu, M. & Oberwager, J. (1987) Computerized versus traditional administration of the multidimensional aptitude battery-verbal scale: an examination of reliability and validity. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 129-137.
  • Hulstijn, J. (2001). Intention and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal, and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jiang, W. & Ramsay, G. (2005). Rapport-building through CALL in teaching Chinese as a foreign language: An exploratory study. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 47-63
  • Jones, J. (2001). CALL and the responsibilities of teachers and administrators. ELT Journal, 55(4), 360-367.
  • Kinzie, M. B., Delcourt, M. A. B., & Powers, S. M. (1994). Computer technologies: Attitudes and self-efficacy across undergraduate disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 35, 745-768.
  • Kirsch, I., Jamieson, J., Taylor, C., & Eignor, D. (1998). Computer Familiarity among TOEFL Examinees. (TOEFL Research Report No. 59). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Levin, T. & Gordon, C. (1989). Effect of gender and computer experience on attitudes towards computers. Journal of Educational Research, 5, 69-88.
  • Malone, M., Carpenter, H., Winke, P., & Kenyon, D. (2001). Development of a Web-based listening and reading test for less commonly taught languages. Work in progress session presented at the 23rd Annual Language Testing Research Colloquium, St. Louis, MO.
  • Mazdayasna, G., & Tahririan, M. H. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs of Iranian students: The case of students of nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 277-289.
  • Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Powers, D. & O’Neill. K. (1993). Inexperienced and anxious computer users: coping with a computer-administered test of academic skills. Educational Assessment, 1, 153-173.
  • Roever, C. (2001). Web-based language testing. Language Learning and Technology, 5(2), 84-94.
  • Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 205-219.
  • Son, J.-B. (2004). Teacher development in e-learning environments. In J.-B. Son (Ed.), Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Concepts, Contexts and Practices (pp. 107-122). Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.
  • Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D. & Kirsch, I. (1998). The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks. TOEFL Research Reports. Report 61. Princeton, NJ, USA: Educational Testing Services.
  • Vincino, F. & Moreno, K. (1988) Test-taker’s attitudes toward and acceptance of a computerised adaptive test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, USA.
  • Wainer, H. (1990). Introduction and history. In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (pp. 1-22). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ward, T. J., Hooper, S. R., & Hannafin, K. M. (1989). The effect of computerized tests on the performance and attitudes of college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(3), 327-333.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.