2012 | Tom VII (XLVIII), fasc. B | 243-250
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
Physical description
  • AKKERMANS P.M., SCHWARTZ G.M., 2003, The archaeology of Syria. From complex hunter-gatherers to early urban societies (ca. 16,000-300 BC), Cambridge.
  • BECKER C., 1998, Can animal bones reflect household activities?A case study from a prehistoric site in Greece [in:] Man and the animal world. Studies in archaeozoology, archaeology, anthropology and paleoliguistics in memoriam of Sandor Bokonyi, P. Anreiter, L. Bartosiewicz, E. Jerem, W. Meid eds, p. 79-86, Budapest.
  • BINFORD L.R., 1981 Bones. Ancient men and modern myths, New York.
  • BINFORD L.R., 1984 Faunal remains from Klasies River mouth, New York.
  • BLAKE G., FOGELMAN I., 2000, Diagnostyka radiologiczna osteoporozy, [in:] Osteoporoza, Aktualny stan wiedzy, N.K. Arden T.D. Spencer eds, Warszawa, p. 50-65.
  • EDMONDS M., 1999, Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic. Landscapes, monuments and memory, London-New York.
  • GRAYSON D.K., 1984 Quantitative zooarchaeology. Topics in the analysis of archaeologicalfaunas, Orlando.
  • GREENFIELD H.J., 2005, A reconsideration of the secondary products revolution. 20 years of research in the central Balkans [in:] The zooarachaeology of milk and fats (Proceedings of the 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham 2002), J. Mulville, A. Outram eds, Oxford, p. 14-31.
  • GIFFORD-GONZALEZ D., 1993, Gaps in the zooarchaeological analyses of butchery. Is gender an issue? [in:] From bones to behavior. Ethnoarchaeological and experimental contributions to the interpretation of faunal remains, J. Hudson ed., [Centerfor archaeological investigations, occasional paper, No. 21], Carbondale, p. 181-199.
  • KRETZOI M., 1968 Etude paleontologique [in:] La station du paleolitique moyen d’Erd, Hongrie, M. Gabori, V. Csank eds, Budapest, p. 59-104.
  • KREUTZER L.A., 1992, Bison and deer mineral densities. Comparisons and implications for the interpretation of archaeological faunas, JASc 19, p. 271-294.
  • LAM Y.M., XINGBIN CH., MAREAN C.W., FREY C., 1998, Bone density and long bone representation in archaeological faunas. Comparing results from CT and photon densitometry, JASc 25, p. 559-570.
  • LAM Y.M., XINGBIN CH., PEARSON O.M., 1999, Intertaxonomic variability in patterns of bone density and the differential representation of bovid, cervid, and equid elements in the archaeological record, AmAnt 64 (2), p. 343-62.
  • LYMAN L.R., 1984 Bone density and differential survivorship offossil classes, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 3, p. 259¬299.
  • LYMAN L.R., 1994, Vertebrate taphonomy, Cambridge.
  • MAKOWIECKI D. 1998 Możliwości poznawcze i niektóre problemy metodyczne polskiej archeozoologii [in:] Nauki przyrodnicze i fotografia lotnicza w archeologii, W. Śmigielski ed., Poznań, p. 77-95.
  • MAKOWIECKI D., 2001, Hodowla oraz użytkowanie zwierząt na Ostrowie Lednickim w średniowieczu, Lednica.
  • MARCINIAK A., 2005, Placing animals in the Neolithic. Social zooarchaeology of prehistoricfarming communities, London.
  • MARTIN L., RUSSELL N., 2005, The ęatalhoyuk mammal remains [in:] Inhabiting ęatalhoyuk: Reports from the 1995-1999 seasons, I. Hodder ed. [McDonaldInstituteMonographs], Cambridge, p. 33-98.
  • REITZ E.J., 1987 Vertebrate fauna and socioeconomic status [in:] Consumer choice in historical archaeology, S.M. Spencer- -Wood ed., New York-London, p. 101-119.
  • SHERRATT A., 1995 Alcohol and its alternatives. Symbol and substance in pre-industrial cultures [in:] Consuming habits. Drugs in history and anthropology, J. Goodman, P.E. Lovejoy, A. Sherratt eds, London, p. 11-46.
  • STINERM.C., 1991 Food procurement and transport by human and non-human predators,JASc 18, p. 455-482.
  • STINERM.C., 1994, Honor among thieves. A zooarchaeological study of Neanderthal ecology, Princeton-New Jersey.
  • THOMAS J.S., 1999 An economy of substances in earlier Neolithic Britain [in:] Material, Symbols, Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Carbondale, J. Robb ed., p. 70-89.
  • UERPMANN H.P., 1973 Animal bone finds and economic archaeology. A critical study of „osteo-archaeology”, World Archaeology 4, p. 307-322.
Na zakończenie odpowiedź Alicji Lasoty-Moskalewskiej
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.