PL EN


2017 | 3(17) | 3 | 155-158
Article title

Rejoinder to Methodology…?! Why? Some methodological aspects of the controversy between mainstream economics and institutionalism by Peter Galbács

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
Keywords
Year
Volume
Issue
3
Pages
155-158
Physical description
Dates
published
2017-09-30
Contributors
  • Poznań University of Economics and Business, Faculty of International Business and Economics, Department of International Management, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-8754 Poznań, Poland, beata.stepien@ue.poznan.pl.
References
  • Age, L.-J. (2011). Grounded Theory Methodology: Positivism, Hermeneutics, and Pragmatism. Qualitative Report, 16, pp.1599–1615.
  • Aumann R., (2005), http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2005/aumann-lecture.html
  • Boehm, S. (1982). The ambiguous notion of subjectivism: Comment on Lachmann. In: I. Kirzner (Ed.), Method, Process, and Austrian Economics. Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises (pp. 41–52). Lexington, MA and Toronto: Lexington Books.
  • Colander D., Holt R., Barkley Rosser Jr. J (2007-2008), Live and Dead Issues in the Methodology of Economics, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Winter), pp. 303-312
  • Colander, D. C. (2005), The Crisis in Economics: The Post- Autistic Economics Movement: The First 600 Days - Review Article, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 12, issue. 2, pp. 336-42.
  • Colander, D., Holt, R., & Rosser, B. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485–499.
  • Davis, J. B. (2007) 'The Turn in Economics and the Turn in Economic Methodology', Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 14, issue. 3, pp. 275-90.
  • Davis, J. B. (2012), Samuels on Methodological Pluralism in Economics. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology (Vol. 30), Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. http://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-4154(2012)000030A010
  • Drakopoulos, S. A. (2016). Economic crisis , economic methodology and the scientific ideal of physics, Vol. 1, June, 28–58.
  • Lawson, T. (2006), The Nature of Heterodox Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, July, 30(4), 483-505.
  • Mirowski, P. (1992). Do economists suffer from physics envy?. Finnish Economic Papers, 5(1), 61-68.
  • Robbins, L. (1938) Live and Dead Issues in the Methodology of Economics.” Economica, August, 5, 342-352.
  • Samuels, W. J. (1998). Methodological pluralism; in J. Davis, D. W. Hands & U. Maki (Eds.), Handbook of economic methodology , Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Whitehead, A. N. (1958). Modes of thought. New York, NY: Capricorn.
  • Sen, A. (2012), quote at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev/
  • Simon, H, (1979), Rational decision-making in business organizations, American Economic Review, Vol. 69, No.4
  • Vanberg, V.J., (2004), Austrian Economics, Evolutionary Psychology, and Methodological Dualism: Subjectivism Reconsidered. Advances in Austrian Economics, 7, pp.155–199.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-229ce45a-bdf5-4620-a09d-c20675ffebb3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.