Rejoinder to Methodology…?! Why? Some methodological aspects of the controversy between mainstream economics and institutionalism by Peter Galbács

• Authors: Stępień Beata
• Languages of publication: EN
• Publisher: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
• Journal: Economics and Business Review
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 3(17)
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 155-158

Dates

published

2017-09-30

Contributors

author

Stępień Beata

• Poznań University of Economics and Business, Faculty of International Business and Economics, Department of International Management, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-8754 Poznań, Poland

References

• Age, L.-J. (2011). Grounded Theory Methodology: Positivism, Hermeneutics, and Pragmatism. Qualitative Report, 16, pp.1599–1615.
• Aumann R., (2005), http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2005/aumann-lecture.html
• Boehm, S. (1982). The ambiguous notion of subjectivism: Comment on Lachmann. In: I. Kirzner (Ed.), Method, Process, and Austrian Economics. Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises (pp. 41–52). Lexington, MA and Toronto: Lexington Books.
• Colander D., Holt R., Barkley Rosser Jr. J (2007-2008), Live and Dead Issues in the Methodology of Economics, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Winter), pp. 303-312
• Colander, D. C. (2005), The Crisis in Economics: The Post- Autistic Economics Movement: The First 600 Days - Review Article, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 12, issue. 2, pp. 336-42.
• Colander, D., Holt, R., & Rosser, B. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485–499.
• Davis, J. B. (2007) 'The Turn in Economics and the Turn in Economic Methodology', Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 14, issue. 3, pp. 275-90.
• Davis, J. B. (2012), Samuels on Methodological Pluralism in Economics. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology (Vol. 30), Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. http://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-4154(2012)000030A010
• Drakopoulos, S. A. (2016). Economic crisis , economic methodology and the scientific ideal of physics, Vol. 1, June, 28–58.
• Lawson, T. (2006), The Nature of Heterodox Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, July, 30(4), 483-505.
• Mirowski, P. (1992). Do economists suffer from physics envy?. Finnish Economic Papers, 5(1), 61-68.
• Robbins, L. (1938) Live and Dead Issues in the Methodology of Economics.” Economica, August, 5, 342-352.
• Samuels, W. J. (1998). Methodological pluralism; in J. Davis, D. W. Hands & U. Maki (Eds.), Handbook of economic methodology , Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Whitehead, A. N. (1958). Modes of thought. New York, NY: Capricorn.
• Sen, A. (2012), quote at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev/
• Simon, H, (1979), Rational decision-making in business organizations, American Economic Review, Vol. 69, No.4
• Vanberg, V.J., (2004), Austrian Economics, Evolutionary Psychology, and Methodological Dualism: Subjectivism Reconsidered. Advances in Austrian Economics, 7, pp.155–199.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18559/ebr.2017.3.13