2015 | 14(21) | 67-83
Article title

International Interests of Great Britain in the Conditions of the Modern Crisis of the European Security System

Title variants
Languages of publication
Strategic approaches and interests of Great Britain in the conditions of the modern crisis of the European security system in connection with the Russian-Ukrainian conflict are analyzed in the article. The historical features of London’s policy on the subject of European integration in the field of security are discovered. The author concentrates attention on the reasons of the modern crisis of the European security system. There are revealed the forming factors and the main point of political positions of the EU, the US, NATO, and Great Britain in relation to the military-political aggression of Russia against Ukraine in 2014. The features of the European policy of the British government in the field of security and the strategic interests of Great Britain in the conditions of a renewal of the elements of bloc-civilization conflict are analyzed.
Physical description
  • Ternopil National Economic University
  • A. Sytas, A. Croft, Insight – Ukraine Crisis will be “Game Changer” for NATO, Brussels 2014, May 18,, (accessed 28.04.2015).
  • B. Reitschuster, Putins Demokratur: Ein Machtmensch und sein System, Berlin 2014, p. 26.
  • C. Copley, German Army to Procure More than 100 Additional Leopard 2 Tanks, Berlin (Reuters), 10 April 2015, Type= RSS&feedName=worldNews (accessed 29.04.2015).
  • Defence Data 2012, ed. E. Platteau, Brussels 2013, p. 4.
  • E. Lucas, The New Cold War: Putin’s Russia and the Threat to the West, New York 2014, p. 268.
  • European Council December 2013: David Cameron’s press conference. Brussels, 20 December 2013, (accessed 30.04.2015).
  • H. Van Rompuy, EU hegt keinerlei geopolitische Ambitionen, Frankfurter Allgemeine, 21.05.2014,, (accessed 1.05.2015).
  • I. A. Cyr, Europe and the United States: change and continuity, International Affairs 2012, no. 88:6, p. 1315.
  • K. Nielsen, EU Soft Power and the Capability-Expectations Gap, Journal of Contemporary European Research 2013, Vol. 9, Iss. 5, pp. 723–739.
  • L. Mangasarian, Putin Emboldened on Instability Arc by EU Defense Divide, Bloomberg 2014, May 15,, (accessed 1.05.2015).
  • M. Hookham, British troops to deter Russians, The Sunday Times 2014, 3 August, (accessed 28.04.2015).
  • M. Pagano, Land for gas: Merkel and Putin Discussed Secret Deal Could end Ukraine Crisis, The Independent, 31 July 2014, (accessed 2.05.2015).
  • O. Wright, Exclusive: Tories under Fire for Links to Pro-Russia Lobbyists, The Independent 2014, 3 July, 3.html (accessed 1.05.2015).
  • R. Cooper, The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century, London 2003, p. 8.
  • R. Harris, D. Phil, Britain and Europe: Where America’s Interests Really Lie, The Heritage Foundation 2013, Special Report no 131 on Europe, April 29, (accessed 16.04.2015).
  • S. Biscop, The UK and European Defence: Leading or Leaving, [in:] International Affairs, 2012, no 88:6, p. 1297.
  • S. Erlanger, Eastern Europe Frets About NATO’s Ability to Curb Russia, The New York Times 2014, April 23.
  • S. Guzelyte, National Defence Data 2012 of the EDA Participating Member States, Brussels 2014, p. 4.
  • S. Lehne, The Big Three in EU Foreign Policy, Washington 2012, p. 4.
  • Trends in World Military Expenditure 2012, SIPRI, April 2013, p. 2.
  • В. Иноземцев, Потерянное десятилетие, Москва 2013, p. 587.
  • З. Бжезінський, Україна у геостратегічному контексті, Київ 2006, p. 14.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.