2018 | 18 | 3 | 105-125
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
The purpose of this paper is to examine how effective mobile devices are in the process of teaching and learning English through the perspective of university students. The research is aimed at finding out whether using mobile apps for learning purposes, in particular, for learning English is of interest for students and look at potential ways of learning the language. It also aims at exploring potential of educational applications downloaded to students’ mobile phones in terms of their integration into the classroom activities at university for the purposes of learning English. To fully conceptualize the research in mobile teaching and learning, the authors addressed the mentioned problem by using Google Forms. An online questionnaire was created and sent to students with responses collected in an online spreadsheet and was further analyzed by the authors. 102 representatives from 16 countries who study at 4 universities located in Poland and Ukraine took part in the survey. To link the reported mobile device use obtained from the questionnaire and its actual use for language learning the follow-up interviews for the subset of students were conducted with the relevant conclusions drawn. The issue of using mobile devices in the process of university study as an educational tool was investigated and proposed to potentially expand perceptions of tutorial experience of how we view teaching and learning English.
Physical description
  • Akobirov, F. (2004). The Influence of Technology on language Learning and Motivation with Uzbek EFL and United States ESL Students. M.A. dissertation. Bukhara: Bukhara State University. Retrieved April 2018, from
  • Berns, M. (1995). English in the European Union. English Today, 43, 11(3), 3-11.
  • Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dooly, M. (2018). “I do which the question”: Students’ innovative use of technology resources in the language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 184-217. Retrieved April 2018, from
  • Dubois M., & Vial, I. (2000). Multimedia and design: The effects of relating multimodal information. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2), 157-165. Retrieved April 2018, from
  • de Caro, E. E. R. (2009). The advantages and importance of learning and using idioms in English. Retrieved October 2017, from
  • Fabio, S. (2012). 10 ways that mobile learning will revolutionize education. Retrieved October 2017, from
  • Felix, U (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research?. ReCALL, 20(2), 141-161. Retrieved April 2018, from 10.1017/s0958344008000323.
  • Gimeno-Sanz, A. & Davies, G. (2010). CALL software design and implementation. Module 3.2. In G. Davies (ed.), Information and Communications Technology for Language Teachers (ICT4LT). Slough: Thames Valley University. Retrieved April 2018, from
  • Guo, H. (2014). Analysing and Evaluating Current Mobile Applications for Learning English Speaking. Birkbeck: University of London. Retrieved April, from
  • Hong, K. H. (2010). CALL teacher education as an impetus for 12 teachers in integrating technology. ReCALL. 22(1), 53-69. Retrieved April 2018, from 10.1017/s095834400999019X
  • Hubbard, P. (2013). Making a case for learner training in technology-enhanced language learning environments. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 163-178. Retrieved April, from
  • Hymes, D.H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Jewitt, C. (2001). A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning. London: Institute of Education University of London. Retrieved April 2018, from:
  • Levy, M. (1997). CALL: Context and Conceptualisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • LaVelle, M. (1996). The importance of learning English: A national survey of Hispanic parents. Retrieved October 2017, from
  • Lynch, M. (2015). Do mobile devices in the classroom really improve learning outcomes? Retrieved October 2017, from
  • McMurry, B. L., Williams, D. D., Rich, P. J., & Hartshorn, K. J. (2016). An evaluation framework for CALL. TESL-EJ, 20(2), n2.
  • Metruk R. (2017). The use of electronic dictionaries for pronunciation practice by university EFL students. Teaching English with Technology, 17(4), 38-51.
  • Mobile Learning. Retrieved October 2017, from
  • Norton, J. (2014). How students can use mobiles to learn English. Retrieved October 2017, from
  • Nushi, M., & Hosein M. E. (2017). Duolingo: A mobile application to assist second language learning. Teaching English with Technology, 17(1), 89-98.
  • Pachler, N., Cook, J., & Bachmair, B. (2010). Appropriation of mobile cultural resources for learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(1), 1-21.
  • Segev, E. (2014). Mobile learning: improve your English anytime, anywhere. Retrieved October 2017, from
  • Smith, K., & Craig, H. (2013). Enhancing the autonomous use of CALL: A new curriculum model in EFL. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 252-278. Retrieved April 2018, from
  • Debbita, T. (2016). Trends in second/foreign language teaching and learning: The position assigned to the learning of lexis over the years. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, ALLS/Aus. Retrieved October 2017, from:
  • Thorne, S. L., & Smith, B. (2011). Second language development theories and technology-mediated language learning. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 268-277. Retrieved April 2018, from
  • Thomas, M., & Reinders, H. (1988) (eds.). Task-Based Language learning and Teaching with Technology. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (ed.), Multimedia Language Teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International. Retrieved April 2018, from
  • Wilkins, D.A. (1974). Second-language Learning and Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Zimmerman, C.B. (1997). Historical trends in second language vocabulary instruction. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy (pp. 5-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.