Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | nr 15 | 191-206

Article title

Voluntary Blood Donors vs. Nondonors Empirical Evidence from Poland, and Implications for the Donor Relationship Management

Title variants

PL
Honorowi dawcy krwi a osoby nie oddające krwi. Dane empiryczne z Polski i implikacje dla zarządzania relacjami z dawcami

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Ensuring a steady blood supply still remains a challenge for health care and blood collection organizations. One way to attack the problem is through donor relationship management, which should be founded on a profound understanding of donors to design an effective strategy for attracting and retaining viable prospects. Drawing on the literature review, the authors hypothesized and provide empirical evidence that donors and nondonors would differ in terms of selected attitudes, personal values, the self-concept, the level of altruism, and the perceived donor value (inspired by the customer value). Using the authors’ and others’ findings, one can design a relationship process focusing on persuasive messages, relationship bonds, the organization’s interface, as well as the offering.
PL
Zapewnienie stałego dopływu krwi nadal stanowi wyzwanie dla organizacji opieki zdrowotnej i stacji krwiodawstwa. Jednym z możliwych sposobow na zmierzenia się z problemem jest zarządzanie relacjami z darczyńcami, ktore powinno opierać się na głębokim zrozumieniu dawcow w celu opracowania skutecznej strategii przyciągania i utrzymywania stałych dawcow 1) MD, Transfusion Medicine Specialist, Primary Care Physician at Center-Med. 2) PhD, Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii w Informatyki w Krakowie, Departament of Management and Accounting. 192 Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii i Informatyki w Krakowie krwi. Opierając się na przeglądzie literatury, autorzy postawili hipotezę, a także potwierdzili danymi empirycznymi fakt, iż dawcy i osoby nie oddające krwi rożnią pod względem wybranych postaw, wartości osobistych, koncepcji własnej, poziomu altruizmu i postrzeganej wartości bycia dawcą. Korzystając z ustaleń autorow i innych badaczy, można zaprojektować proces relacji skupiający się na perswazyjnych komunikatach, więzach relacyjnych, interfejsie organizacji, a także odpowiedniej definicji „oferty”.

Year

Issue

Pages

191-206

Physical description

Dates

published
2020-04-01

Contributors

  • Primary Care Physician at Center- Med
  • Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii i Informatyki w Krakowie

References

  • Allen J, Butler DD. 1993. Assessing the effects of donor knowledge and perceived risk on intentions to donate blood. J Health Care Mark 13: 26-33.
  • Andaleeb SS, Basu AK. 1995. Explaining blood donation: The trust factor. J Health Care Mark 15: 42-48.
  • Bester H, Guth W. 1998. Is altruism evolutionary stable? J Econ Behav Organ 34: 193-209. Zeszyty Naukowe nr 15 205
  • Bohner G, Wanke M. 2002. Attitudes and attitude change. Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Buciuniene I, Stoniene L, Blazeviciene A, Kazlauskaite R, Skudiene V. 2006. Blood donors’ motivation and attitude to non-remunerated blood donation in Lithuania. BMC Public Health 6: 166-173. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-166.
  • Burnett JJ. 1981. Psychographic and demographic characteristics of blood donors. J Cons Res, 8: 62-66.
  • Burnett JJ. 1982. Examining the profiles of the donor and nondonor through a multiple discriminant approach. Transfusion 22: 138-142.
  • Callero P, Piliavin J. 1983. Developing a commitment to blood donation: The impact of one’s first experience. J Appl Soc Psychol 13: 1-16.
  • Chliaoutakis J, Trakas DJ, Socrataki F, Lemonidou C, Papaioannou D. 1994. Blood donor behaviour in Greece: Implications for health policy. Soc Sci Med 38: 1461-1467.
  • Eggert A, Ulaga W. 2002. Customer perceived value: A substitute for satisfaction in business markets? J Bus Ind Market 17: 107-118.
  • Ferguson E, Bibby PA. 2002. Predicting future blood donor returns: Past behaviour, intentions, and observer effects. Health Psychol 21: 513-518.
  • Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E. 2003. Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol Hum Behav 24: 153-172.
  • Gronroos C. 1994. From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Manag Decis 32: 4-20.
  • Gronroos C. 1996. Relationship marketing: strategic and tactical implications. Manag Decis, 34: 5-14.
  • Holdershaw J, Gendall P, Wright M. 2007. Factors influencing blood donation behaviour. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference. Retrieved August 4, 2009, from University of Otago, School of Business Web site: http://smib.vuw.ac.nz:8081/WWW/ ANZMAC2007/papers/Holdershaw_2.pdf
  • Humphrey N. 1997. Varieties of altruism – and the common ground between them. Soc Res 64: 199-209.
  • Knight RJ. 1983. The stimulation and planning of blood donation: A marketing problem. Eur J Mark 17: 65-73.
  • Kotler P, Armstrong G. 2008. Principles of Marketing (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Lee L, Piliavin JA, Call VRA. 1999. Giving time, money, and blood: Similarities and differences. Soc Psychol Q 62: 276-290. 206 Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii i Informatyki w Krakowie
  • Leibrecht BC, Hogan JM, Luz GA, Tobias KI. 1976. Donor and nondonor motivations. Transfusion 16: 182-189.
  • Leigh L, Bist M, Alexe R. 2007. Marketing blood drives to students: A case study. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 20: 84-95.
  • Nonis SA, Ford CW, Logan L, Hudson G. 1996. College student’s blood donation behavior: Relationship to demographics, perceived risk, and incentives. Health Mark Q, 13(4), 33-46.
  • Oswalt RM. 1977. A review of blood donor motivation and recruitment. Transfusion 17: 123-135.
  • Piliavin JA, Callero PL, Evans DE. 1982. Addiction to altruism? Opponent- process theory and habitual blood donation. J Pers Soc Psychol 43: 1200-1213.
  • Reed A. II 2002. Social identity as a useful perspective for self-conceptbased consumer research. Psychol Market 19: 235-266.
  • Sanchez AM, Ameti DI, Schreiber GB, Thomson RA, Lo A, Bethel J, Williams AE. 2001. The potential impact of incentives on future blood donation behavior. Transfusion 41: 172-178.
  • Sheth JN, Mittal BM. 2004. Consumer behavior: A managerial perspective (2nd ed.). Mason: South-Western.
  • Sirgy MJ. 1982. Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. J Consum Res 9: 287-301.
  • Solomon MR. 2002. Consumer behavior: Buying, having, being (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Staallekker LA, Stammeijer RN, Dudok de Wit C. 1980. A Dutch Blood Bank and its Donors. Transfusion 20: 66-70.
  • Tscheulin DK, Lindenmeier J. 2005. The willingness to donate blood: An empirical analysis of socio-demographic and motivation-related determinants. Health Serv Manage Res 18: 165-174.
  • Woodruff RB. 1997. Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. J Acad Market Sci 25: 139-153.
  • Zeithaml VA. 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Market 52: 2-22.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-26ad27bd-4859-4dd0-93f9-74634bff8914
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.