Efficiency of Cross-Border Information Exchange

• Authors: Kemeny Gabor

Title variants

PL

COVID-19 a działalność przedsiębiorcza: analiza porównawcza konsekwencji i oczekiwań

RU

Эффективность трансграничного обмена информацией

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The aim of this paper is to provide an insight into the influencing factors of international police information exchange conducted by the Single Points of Contact (SPOC) and the Police and Customs Cooperation Centre (PCCC) within the EU. The author achieves this goal by introducing the relevant scientific theories and the results of the conducted quantitative research. The research identifies the influencing environments of cross-border information exchange and through this, finds supporting and hindering factors such as organisational structure, culture, leadership, legislation, and ICT environment. Findings can help decision makers and end users to overcome everyday obstacles.

PL

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie czynników wpływających na międzynarodową wymianę informacji policyjnych prowadzoną przez unijne Pojedyncze Punkty Kontaktowe (SPOC) oraz Centrum Współpracy Policyjno-Celnej (PCCC). Autor stara się osiągnąć ten cel przedstawiając wybrane teorie naukowe i wyniki przeprowadzonych badań ilościowych. Artykuł identyfikuje środowisko transgranicznej wymiany informacji, a dzięki temu wskazuje czynniki wspierające i utrudniające, takie jak struktura organizacyjna, kultura, przywództwo, prawodawstwo i środowisko ICT. Wyniki badań mogą pomóc decydentom i użytkownikom pokonywać codzienne przeszkody w tej dziedzinie.

Keywords

EN

law enforcement cooperation; information exchange; European Union; Schengen; trans-border crime; EU law

PL

współpraca organów ścigania wymiana informacji; Unia Europejska; Schengen; przestępczość transgraniczna; prawo UE

• Publisher: Instytut Nauk Społecznych i Bezpieczeństwa Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach
• Journal: De Securitate et Defensione. O Bezpieczeństwie i Obronności
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 2(6)
• Pages: 23-42

Dates

published

2020-12-31

Contributors

author

Kemeny Gabor

• University of Public Service, Hungary

References

• Arches Joan. 1991. “Social Structure, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction”. Social Work (36): 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/36.3.202
• Argote Linda, Ingram Paul, Levine John M, Moreland Richard L. 2000. “Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (82): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2883
• Axelrod Robert and Hamilton Wiliam D. 1981. “The Evolution of Cooperation”. Science New Series (211): 1391-1396. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/Axelrod and Hamilton EC 1981.pdf
• Bock Gee-Woo, Zmud Robert, Kim Young-Gul and Lee Jae-Nam. 2005. “Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate”. MIS Quarterly (29): 87-111. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0dc6/e17f67e2a3d2d3288eda958c9eed71257f29.pdf>
• Bryman Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. OXFORD University Press.
• Bstieler Ludwig. 2006. “Trust Formation in Collaborative New Product Development”. Journal of Product Innovation Management (23): 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00181.x
• Cater Barbara. 2008. “The Importance of Social Bonds for Communication and Trust in Marketing Relationships in Professional Services”. Management (13): 1-15. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/40228
• Chau Michael, Zeng Daniel, Atabakhsh Homa and Chen Hsiu-chinu. 2002. “Building an Infrastructure for Law Enforcement Information Sharing and Collaboration: Design Issues and Challenges”. Proceedings of The National Conference on Digital Government Research.
• Constant David, Kiesler Sara and Sproull Lee. 1994. “What’s Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing”. Information Systems Research (5): 400-421. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23010604
• Doherty Richard, Vandresse Benoît, Kamarás Éva, Siede Anna, Segerberg Jan, Hert Paul, Mitsilegas Valsamis. 2015. “Study on the Implementation of the European Information Exchange Model (EIXM) for Strengthening Law Enforcement Cooperation”. European Commission, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/police-cooperation/general/docs/eixm_study_-_final_report_en.pdf
• European Commission. 2004. Enhancing Police and Customs Cooperation in the European Union [COM (2004) 376 Final - Not Published in the Official Journal]. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:l16000&from=EN
• European Commission. 2015. A European Agenda on Migration COM(2015) 240 Final. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=en&reference=2015/2660
• European Commission. 2016. Stronger and Smarter Information Systems for Borders and Security, COM(2016) 205 Final. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/ files/e-library/documents/policies/police-cooperation/general/docs/20121207_com_2012_735_en.pdf
• European Police Office. 2017. “Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment". Europol, The Hague.
• European Union. 1985. The Schengen Acquis - Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the Gradual Abolition of Checks at Their C (1985). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX%3A42000A0922%2802%29%3AEN%3AHTML
• Eurostat. 2017. Eurostat, the Statistical Office of the European Union, Police, Court and Prison Personnel Statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title =Police,_court_and_prison_personnel_statistics&stable=0&redirect=no#One_police_officer_per_309_people
• Frontex. 2017. Roles & Responsibilities. https://frontex.europa.eu/operations/roles-responsibilities/
• Gabor Kemeny. 2020. “A qualitative analysis of the hindering and supporting factors of the cross-border information exchange conducted by the single point of contact and the police and customs cooperation centre”. Public Security and Public Order (24): 101-126. https://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/16559
• Gil-García J. Ramon, Schneider Carrie A, Pardo Theresa A, Cresswell Anthony M. 2005. “E-Government Success Factors: Mapping Practical Tools to Theoretical Foundations”. Government Information Quarterly (22): 187-216. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X05000158
• Goldenberg Irina and Dean Waylon H. 2017. Enablers and Barriers to Information Sharing in Military and Security Operations: Lessons Learned in Information sharing in military operations. Springer Cham.
• Hufnagel Saskia. 2016. Policing Cooperation across Borders. London: Routledge.
• Kim Soonhee and Lee Hyangsoo. 2006. “The Impact of Organizational Context and Information Technology on Employee Knowledge-Sharing Capabilities”. Public Administration Review (66): 370-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x
• Koeszegi Sabine T. 2004. “Trust‐building Strategies in Inter‐organizational Negotiations”. Journal of Managerial Psychology (19): 640-660. https://doi.org/10.1108/026839 40410551534
• Lane Christel and Bachmann Reinhard. 1996. “The Social Constitution of Trust: Supplier Relations in Britain and Germany”. Organization Studies (17): 365-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069601700302
• Lunenburg Fred C. 2012. “Organizational Structure: Mintzberg's Framework”. International Journal of Scholary (14.):1-8.
• Mausolf Adam. 2010. Keeping Up Appearances: Collaboration and Coordination in the Fight against Organized Crime and Terrorism. University of Leiden.
• Mintzberg Henri. 1989. The Structuring of Organizations in Readings in Strategic Management. London: Palgrave. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_23
• Rainey Hal G. 1992. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.4050110432
• Resteigne Delphine and Bogaert Steven Van den. 2017. Information Sharing in Contemporary Operations: The Strength of SOF Ties in, Information Sharing in Military Operations. Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-42819-2_4
• Rousseau Denise M. 1978. “Characteristics of Departments, Positions, and Individuals: Contexts for Attitudes and Behavior”. Administrative Science Quarterly (23): 521-540. www.jstor.org/stable/2392578
• Saloven Matjaz, Grant Euan, Hanel Peter, Makai Viktor, Brent Hansen K., Belevicius Linas and Pohnitzer Angelika. 2010. Study on the Status of Information Exchange amongst Law Enforcement Authorities in the Context of Existing EU Instruments. European Commission, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/doc_centre/police/docs/icmpd_study_lea_infoex.pdf
• Saunders Mark, Lewis Philip and Thornhill Adrian. 2008. Research Methods for Business Students. London: Pearson Education Limited.
• Soeters Joseph. 2017. Information Sharing in Military and Security Operations in Information Sharing in Military Operations. Cham: Springer.
• Styczyńska Izabella, Beaumont Eszter-Zolyomi. 2017. Easing Legal and Administrative Obstacles in EU Border Regions. European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/obstacle_border/final_report.pdf
• Sydow Jörg. 1998. rust within and between Organizations in Understanding the constitution of inter-organizational trust. Oxford University Press.
• Travica Bob. 1998. “Information Aspects of New Organizational Designs: Exploring the Non-Traditional Organization”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (49): 1224-1244.
• Weibel Dimitri. 2016. Police and Border Cooperation in Schengen: The Police and Customs Cooperation Center (PCCC). Leiden University. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/40745/Weibel%2CDimitri-s1711172-MA Thesis-2016.pdf?sequence=1
• Wheatley Margaret J. 2006. Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Willem Annick and Buelens Marc. 2007. “Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organizations: The Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (17): 581-606.
• Yang Tung-Mou and Maxwell Terrence A. 2011. “Information-Sharing in Public Organizations: A Literature Review of Interpersonal, Intra-Organizational and Inter-Organizational Success Factors”. Government Information Quarterly (28): 164-175.
• Yin Robert K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Zhang Jing and Dawes Sharon S. 2006. “Expectations and Perceptions of Benefits, Barriers, and Success in Public Sector Knowledge Networks”. Public Performance & Management Review (29): 433-466. www.jstor.org/stable/20447606
• Zhang J, Dawes Sharon S and Sarkis Joseph. 2005. “Exploring Stakeholders' Expectations of the Benefits and Barriers of E‐government Knowledge Sharing”. Journal of Enterprise Information Management (18): 548-567. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390510624007

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.34739/dsd.2020.02.02