PL EN


2016 | 6 | 1 | 89-110
Article title

The effectiveness of visual input enhancement on the noticing and L2 development of the Spanish past tense

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Textual manipulation is a common pedagogic tool used to emphasize specific features of a second language (L2) text, thereby facilitating noticing and, ideally, second language development. Visual input enhancement has been used to investigate the effects of highlighting specific grammatical structures in a text. The current study uses a quasi-experimental design to determine the extent to which textual manipulation increase (a) learners’ perception of targeted forms and (b) their knowledge of the forms. Input enhancement was used to highlight the Spanish preterit and imperfect verb forms and an eye tracker measured the frequency and duration of participants’ fixation on the targeted items. In addition, pretests and posttests of the Spanish past tense provided information about participants’ knowledge of the targeted forms. Results indicate that learners were aware of the highlighted grammatical forms in the text; however, there was no difference in the amount of attention between the enhanced and unenhanced groups. In addition, both groups improved in their knowledge of the L2 forms; however, again, there was no differential improvement between the two groups.
Contributors
author
References
  • Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. W. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259-302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i.
  • Ayoun, D., & Salaberry, R. (2005). Tense and aspect in Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Bowles, M. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. New York: Routledge.
  • Donley, P., Benacides, J., & Blanco, J. (2006). Aventuras: Primer curso de lengua espanola. Boston, MA: Vista Higher Learning.
  • Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dussias, P. E. (2010). Uses of eye-tracking data in second language sentence processing research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 149-166.
  • Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1-46.
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
  • Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
  • Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21, 175-198.
  • Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 483-517.
  • Han, Z., Park, E. S., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 597-618.
  • Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
  • Jourdenais, R. (1998). The effects of textual enhancement on the acquisition of the Spanish preterit and imperfect (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 183-216). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
  • Lee, S. K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL student’s reading comprehension and learning of passive voice. Language Learning, 57, 87-118.
  • Lee, S. K., & Huang, H. T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307-331.
  • Leeser, M. (2004). The effects of topic familiarity, mode, and pausing on second language learners’ comprehension and focus on form. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(4), 587-616.
  • Leow, R. P. (1997a). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47, 467-505.
  • Leow, R. P. (1997b). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers’ comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
  • Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557-584.
  • Leow, R. P. (2001). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84, 496-509.
  • Leow, R. P., Egi, T., Nuevo, A. M., & Tsai, Y.-C. (2003). The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners’ comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1-16.
  • Leow, R. P., Grey, S., Marijuan, S., & Moorman, C. (2014). Concurrent data elicitation procedures, processes, and early stages of L2 learning: A critical overview. Second Language Research, 30, 111-127.
  • Loewen, S. (2011). Focus on Form. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 576-592). New York: Routledge.
  • Loewen, S., Erlam, R., & Ellis, R. (2009). The incidental acquisition of third person –s as implicit and explicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J.
  • Philp, & R. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 262-280). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
  • Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Montrul, S. (2004). The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Montrul, S., & Salaberry, R. (2003). The acquisition of Spanish tense and aspect. In B. Lafford & R. Salaberry (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish: The state of the science (pp. 47-73). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
  • Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
  • Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-258.
  • Pica, T. (1983). Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 69-78.
  • Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61, 993-1038.
  • Porte, G. K. (Ed.). (2012). Replication in applied linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
  • Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
  • Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-678). New York: Blackwell.
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
  • Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118-132.
  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
  • Shook, D. J. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-tointake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57-93.
  • Simard, D. (2008). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37(1), 124-135.
  • Simard, D., & Wong, W. (2001). Alertness, orientation, and detection: The conceptualization of attentional functions in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 103-124.
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
  • Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
  • VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
  • Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • White, J. (1996). An input enhancement study with ESL children: Effects on the acquisition of possessive determiners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • White, J. (1998). Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus-on-form in second language classroom acquisition (pp. 91-128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Williams, J. (2005). Form-focused instruction. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 671-691). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Winke, P. (2013). The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension: A modified replication of Lee (2007) with eye-movement data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 323-352.
  • Wong, W. (2000). The effects of textual enhancement and simplified input on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA.
  • Wong, W. (2001). Modality and attention to meaning and form in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 345-368.
  • Wong, W. (2003). Textual enhancement and simplified input: Effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 13, 17-45.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-2a6b4915-256c-40bb-a849-a6beb39a1106
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.