Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 63 (LXIII) | 2 | 93-107

Article title

Mechanisms of attaining professional and managerial positions and gender. The case of Estonia

Authors

Content

Title variants

PL
Mechanizmy osiagania pozycji zawodowej i stanowisk kierowniczych a płeć. Przykład Estonii

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
In Estonia, gender segregation and the gender wage gap are the greatest in Europe [European Institute for Gender Equality 2013]. Previous research shows that men and women also have to use different strategies to reach the highest positions in the labour market [Roots 2011a; Titma, Roots and Soidla 2010]. The data about Estonia in the European Social Survey 2010 shows that attainment in one’s occupation of managerial and professional status (occupation attainment) are indeed predicated on different factors, but after adding the variable of gender segregation into the immediate work place the occupation attainment mechanisms of men and women start to resemble each other. Hence, the main reason for the differences in occupational attainment mechanisms is labour market segregation.
PL
Estonia jest krajem, w którym segregacja ze względu na płeć oraz różnice w dochodach kobiet i mężczyzn jest największa w Europie [European Institute for Gender Equality 2013]. Dotychczasowe badania wskazują także, że mężczyźni i kobiety muszą stosować odmienne strategie osiągania najwyższych pozycji na rynku pracy [Roots 2011a; Titma, Roots and Soidla 2010]. Dane dotyczące Estonii z Europejskiego Sondażu Społecznego 2010 pokazują, że choć osiąganie pozycji menedżerów i profesjonalistów jest uwarunkowane rozmaitymi czynnikami, to uwzględnienie segregacji ze względu na płeć jako zmiennej powoduje, że mechanizmy osiągania pozycji zawodowych kobiet i mężczyzn zaczynają kształtować się podobnie. Z tego powodu wydaje się, że głównym czynnikiem różnicującym te mechanizmy jest segregacja na rynku pracy.

Year

Volume

Issue

2

Pages

93-107

Physical description

Dates

published
2014

Contributors

author
  • University of Tartu

References

  • Ashton D.N. and Maguire M.J., 1984, Dual Labour Market Theory and the Organisation of Local Labour Markets, “International Journal of Social Economics”, 11(7), pp. 106–120.
  • Bark, Hernandez A.S., Escartín J. and van Dick R., 2014, Gender and Leadership in Spain: A Systematic Review of Some Key Aspects, “Sex Roles”, 70 (11–12), pp. 522–537.
  • Bauder H., 2001, Culture in the Labor Market: Segmentation Theory and Perspectives of Place, “Progress in Human Geography”, 25 (1), pp. 37–52.
  • Becker R. and Hecken A., 2005, Berufliche Weiterbildung – Arbeitsmarktsoziologische Perspektiven Und Empirische Befunde, in Arbeitsmarktsoziologie, edited by Martin Abraham and Thomas Hinz, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Berger J., Rosenholz S.J. and Zelditch M. Jr, 1980, Status Organizing Processes“Annual Reviews of Sociolgy”, 6, pp. 479–508.
  • Bihagen E., Nermo M. and Stern Ch., 2014, The Gender Gap in the Business Elite Stability and Change in Charac-teristics of Swedish Top Wage Earners in Large Private Companies, 1993–2007, “Acta Sociologica”, 57(2), pp. 119–133.
  • Brody Ch.J., Rubin B.A. and Maume D.J., 2014, Gender Structure and the Effects of Management Citizenship Be-havior, “Social Forces”, 92(4), pp. 1373–1404.
  • Cain G.G., 1976, The Challenge of Segmented Labor Market Theories to Orthodox Theory: A Survey, “Journal of Economic Literature” 14(4): 1215–1257.
  • Charles M. and Bradley K., 2009, Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries, “American Journal of Sociology”, 114(4), pp. 924–976.
  • Charles M. and Grusky D., 2004, Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men, Stanford University Press.
  • Clairmont D., Apostle R. and Kreckel R., 1983, The Segmentation Perspective as a Middle-Range Conceptualization in Sociology, “The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie,” 8(3), pp. 245–271.
  • Correll S.J., 2001, Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessments, “The American Journal of Sociology”, 106(6), pp. 1691–1730.
  • Correll S.J. and Ridgeway C.L., 2006, Expectation States Theory, in: Handbook of Social Psychology, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, edited by John Delamate, New York: Springer.
  • Elliott J.R. and Smith R.A., 2004, Race, Gender, and Workplace Power, “American Sociological Review”, 69(3)pp. 365–386.
  • England P. et al., 2004, Why Are Some Academic Fields Tipping Toward Female? Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved April 24, 2013 (http://apps.olin.wustl.edu/macarthur/papers/england-TippingTowardFemale.pdf).
  • England P., Allison P. and Yuxiao Wu, 2007, Does Bad Pay Cause Occupations to Feminize, Does Feminization Reduce Pay, and How Can We Tell with Longitudinal Data?, “Social Science Research”, 36 pp. 1237–1256.
  • England P., Farkas G., Stanek Kilbourne B. and Dou T., 1988, Explaninig Occupational Sex Segregation and Wages: Findings from a Model with Fixed Effects, “American Sociological Review”, 53(4), pp. 544–558.
  • Erikson R. and Goldthorpe J.H., 1993, The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • European Commission, 2009, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: Equality between Women and Men – 2009, Brussels. Retrieved November 26, 2013 (http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/document.do?code=SEC&year=2009&number=165&extension=FIN).
  • European Institute for Gender Equality, 2013, Gender Equality Index. Vilnius. Retrieved December 27, 2013 (http://eige.europa.eu/apps/gei/content/Gender-Equality-Index-Report.pdf).
  • Fitzsimmons T.W., Callan V.J. and Paulsen N., 2014, Gender Disparity in the C-Suite: Do Male and Female CEOs Differ in How They Reached the Top?, “The Leadership Quarterly”, 25(2)pp. 245–266.
  • Gerber T.P. and Hout M., 2004, Tightening Up: Declining Class Mobility during Russia’s Market Transition, “American Sociological Review”, 69(5, pp. 677 –703.
  • Hoobler J.M., Lemmon G. and Wayne S.J., 2014, Women’s Managerial Aspirations An Organizational Development Perspective, “Journal of Management”, 40(3), pp. 703–30.
  • Hudson, Kenneth. 2007. “The New Labor Market Segmentation: Labor Market Dualism in the New Economy.” Social Science Research 36(1): 286–312.
  • Leontaridi M., 1998, Segmented Labour Markets: Theory and Evidence, “Journal of Economic Surveys”, 12(1), pp. 103–109.
  • Li Y., 2002, Falling off the Ladder? Professional and Managerial Career Trajectories and Unemployment Experi-ence,. “European Sociological Review”, 18(3), pp. 253–270.
  • Rasztar M., 1999, Transformation Und Berufsmobilität, Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus – Verlagsgesellschaft.
  • Ridgeway C.L., 1991, The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics, “Social Forces”, 70(2), pp. 367–386.
  • Ridgeway C.L., 1997, Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment, “American Sociological Review”, 62(2), pp. 218–235.
  • Ridgeway C.L., 2006, Gender as an Organizing Force in Social Relations: Implications for the Future of Inequality, in: The declining significance of gender, ed. F.D. Blau, M.C. Brinton, D.B. Grusky, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Roots A., 2011a, Ameti Sõltuvus Täiendkoolitusest Ja Isikuomadustest Eesti Meestel Ja Naistel, pp. 26–32 in: Sooline ebavõrdsus tööelus: arengud Eestis ja rahvusvaheline võrdlus, edited by Ott Toomet and Mare Ainsaar. Tartu: Tartu Ülikool. Retrieved (http://www.sh.ut.ee/orb.aw/class=file/action=preview/id=1001899/Innove+Raport+I_kogumik.pdf).
  • Roots A., 2011b, Enesetäiendamise Viisi Ja Kõrgema Ametipositsiooni Seos Meeste Ja Naiste Puhul, “Ariadne lõng”, XI(1), pp. 48–57.
  • Roots A., 2012, Enesetäiendamise Viisi Ja Kõrgema Ametipositsiooni Seos Meeste Ja Naiste Puhul, pp. 56–70, in: Sooline ebavõrdsus tööelus: arengud Eestis ja rahvusvaheline võrdlus, edited by Mare Ainsaar and Kairi Talves. Tartu: Tartu Ülikool. Retrieved (http://www.sh.ut.ee/sites/default/files/sh_files/Sooline%20ebav%C3%B5rdsus%20t%C3%B6%C3%B6elus%20III%20kogumik.pdf).
  • Sakamoto A. and Chen M.D., 1991, Inequality and Attainment in a Dual Labor Market, “American Sociological Review”, 56(3), pp. 295–308.
  • Spence M., 1973, Job Market Signaling “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 87(3), pp. 355––374.
  • Titma M., Roots A. and Soidla Indrek, 2010, Gender Differences in Intragenerational Mobility: The Case of Estonia, “European Sociological Review”, 26(3), pp. 337–350.
  • Wagner D.G. and Berger J., 1997, Gender and Interpersonal Task Behaviors: Status Expectation Accounts, “Socio-logical Perspectives”, 40(1), pp. 1–32.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-2a7d871f-19da-4ca1-b8c6-d350f495f55e
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.