The Concept of Intuition and its Role in Plato and Aristotle

• Authors: Piętka Dariusz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The subject of the article is intuition and its role in philosophical cognition in Plato and Aristotle. The main problem concerns the rationality of intuitive knowledge. Plato is the heir of the Parmenidean doctrinal tradition of being and cognition. According to him, intuition is the immediate perceiving of ideas. This may be supernatural intuition or rational intuition. The first is perceiving ideas seen before birth, the second is recollection of knowledge or cognition of ideas in the mind. The aim of intuitive knowledge is the definition of the essence. Plotinus is the successor to Plato’s theory of supernatural intuition. Aristotle used intuition to formulate the first principles of science or to define the goals of activity. Each type is characterised by common features, such as directness, comprehensiveness of cognition and obviousness. There are differences between the types of intuition. First of all, they concern whether the object is natural or supernatural, its intersubjectivity, and the sources of intuitive cognition. In the case of intersubjectivity, Aristotle introduced a confirmation procedure concerning some of principles known intuitively. The idea of confirmation is forced by accusations against, for example, the principle of non–contradiction, which made Aristotle present a certain extra–intuitive way for it to be substantiated.

Keywords

EN

Intuition; nous; Plato; Aristotle; ancient theory of knowledge

• Publisher: Instytut Historii Nauki Polskiej Akademii Nauk
• Journal: Organon
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 47
• Pages: 23-40

Contributors

author

Piętka Dariusz

• Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw

References

• Ajdukiewicz K., Pragmatic Logic, Dordrecht – Boston – Warsaw 1974.
• Blandzi S., Od aletejologii Parmenidesa do ontoteologii Filona, Warszawa 2012.
• Barnes J., The Presocratic Philosophers, vol. l, London 1979.
• Bunge M., Intuition and Science, Englewood Cliffs NJ 1962.
• Burnet J., Early Greek Philosophy, [4th ed.] London 1930.
• Charles S. R., The Emergent Metaphysics in Plato’s Theory of Disorder, Lanham MD 2006.
• Cheyne C., Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects: Causal Objections to Platonism, Dordrecht 2001.
• Cornford F. M., Plato’s Cosmology, New York 1937.
• Diels H. & Kranz W., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, [6th ed.] Berlin 1951–1952 [= DK].
• Frame D., The Myth of Return in Early Greek Epic, Yale 1978.
• Fritz von K., ΝΟΟΣ and ΝΟΕΙΝ in the Homeric Poems in: Classical Philology 38, 1943, pp. 79–93.
• Fritz von K., ΝΟΟΣ, ΝΟΕΙΝ, and their Derivatives in Pre–Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras) [1945–1946] in: The Pre–Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, (ed.) A. P. D. Mourelatos, [2nd ed.] Princeton NJ 1994, pp. 23–85.
• Fuller B. A. G., History of Greek Philosophy: Thales to Democritus, New York 1923, pp. 148–153.
• Furth M., Elements of Eleatic Ontology in: The Pre–Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, (ed.) A. P. D. Mourelatos, [2nd ed.] Princeton NJ 1994, pp. 241–270.
• Griswold C. L., Self–Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus, New Haven – London 1986.
• Kahn Ch. H., The Thesis of Parmenides in: The Review of Metaphysics 22, 4/1969, pp. 701–724.
• Kahn Ch. H., The Verb „Be” in Ancient Greek, Dordrecht 1973.
• Kahn Ch. H., The Role of “Nous” in The Cognition of First Principles in Posterior Analytics II 19 in: Studia Aristotelica 9, 1981, pp. 385–414.
• Komornicka A. M., Studia nad Pindarem i archaiczną liryką grecką. W kręgu pojęć prawdy i fałszu, Łódź 1979.
• Moravcsik J., Plato and Platonism. Plato’s Conception of Appearance and Reality in Ontology, Epistemology and Ethic, and Modern Echoes, Oxford – Cambridge 1992.
• Morawiec E., Intellectual Intuition in the General Metaphysics of Jacques Maritain, Frankfurt/Main 2013.
• Mourelatos A. P. D., The Route of Parmenides, New Haven CT – London 1970.
• Nagy G., Sēma and Nóēsis: Some Illustrations in: Arethusa 16, 1983, pp. 35–55.
• Piętka D., O zasadach niesprzeczności i tożsamości u Parmenidesa in: Filozofia Nauki 9, 3/2001, pp. 49–63.
• Piętka D., Prawda i fałsz w filozofii języka Platona, Nowa Wieś 2011.
• Piętka D., The Elenctic Proof of Aristotle’s Principle of Non–contradiction in: Archiwum Historii Filozofii i Myśli Społecznej 57, 2012, pp. 33–45.
• Price A. W., Virtue and Reason in Plato and Aristotle, Oxford 2011.
• Rijk de L. M., Plato’s Sophist: A Philosophical Commentary, Amsterdam – New York 1986.
• Ross D., Plato’s Theory of Ideas, Oxford 1963.
• Sullivan S. D., The Psychic Term Noos in Homer and the Homeric Hymns in: Studia Italiani di Filologia Classica 7, 1989, pp. 152–195.
• Tait W. W., Noesis: Plato on Exact Science in: Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics, (ed. D. B. Malament, Chicago – La Salle 2002, pp. 11–30.
• Zaborowski R., Some Remarks on Self–Knowledge in the Phaedrus and Hermias’ Commentary in: Organon 45, 2013, pp. 21–33.