2018 | 27/2 | 59-88
Article title

The Structural Simplification Hypothesis and the Premodifiers in Nigerian English

Title variants
Languages of publication
This paper conducts a corpus-based study of the occurrence/non-occurrence, structural pattern, and forms of the premodifi er in the Nigerian English noun phrase, comparing the scenarios that emerge with those of the British and Ghanaian varieties of English. These three phenomena, which are crucial to the nature of premodifi er in new varieties of English, are investigated in relation to predictors representing syntactic function, register, post-dependent syntactic weight, and animacy, showing, among other things, the extent to which structural complexity/simplicity is present in the structure of the premodifi ers studied. Corpus fi ndings indicate that premodifi ers are more likely to occur (53%) than not (47%) and that simple premodifi ers (i.e. one-word premodifi er structural pattern (79%)) are signifi cantly preferred to complex premodifi ers (i.e. two-word at 17% and longer patterns at 4%). Relating to form, single premodifiers are most likely to be realized as adjectives. It is also found that the alternation between simple and complex premodifi ers is most strongly predicted by the syntactic functions that the NP performs, as well as the syntactic weight present in the post dependent slot. Register, which is reputed as a very strong indicator of structural variation (Schils and De Haan 1993; Biber et al. 2007; Schilk and Schaub 2016) is outweighed by syntactic function and post-dependent weight.
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • Aarts, F. 1971. “On the Distribution of Noun-Phrase Types in English ClauseStructure.” Lingua 26: 281–93. doi: 10.1016/0024-3841(71)90013-1
  • Alo, Moses, and Rajend Mesthrie. 2008. “Nigerian English: Morphology and Syntax.” Varieties of English. Africa, South and Southeast Asia. Ed. Rajend Mesthrie. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 323–339.
  • Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.
  • Akinlotan, Mayowa, and Alex Housen. 2017 “Noun Phrase Complexity in Nigerian English: Syntactic Function and Length Outweigh Genre in Predicting Noun Phrase Complexity.” English Today 33.3: 1–8. doi: 10.1017/ S0266078416000626
  • Akinlotan, Mayowa. 2016. “The Eff ects of Structure and Profi ciency on Determiner Number (Dis)agreement in Nigerian Noun Phrase.” Proceedings of the CILC 2016 8th International Conference on Corpus Linguistics. Ed. Antonio Moreno Ortiz, and Chantal Perez-Hernandez. Malaga: Spanish Association for Corpus Linguistics. 1–8.
  • Akinlotan, Mayowa. 2017. “Predicting Defi nite Article Usages in New Englishes: Variety Outweighs Genre and Syntactic Function in Nigerian English.” Anglica: An International Journal of English Studies 26.2: 101–121.
  • Akinlotan, Mayowa. 2018a. “The Occurrence and Structure of Postmodifi er in Nigerian Noun Phrase.” Proceedings of the 17th Texas Linguistics Society Conference. Ed. Michael Everdell et al. Texas-Austin: Texas Linguistic Society. 3–16.
  • Akinlotan, Mayowa. 2018b (forthcoming). “Emergence of New Predictors Projecting Defi nite Article Variability: Evidence from Nigerian English” Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 8.
  • Babalola, Emmanuel Taiwo. 2010. Nominal Group in Standard Nigerian and American English: A Systemic Linguistics Description. Saarbrucken: Verlag Dr. Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG.
  • Berlage, Eva. 2014. Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139057684
  • Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoff rey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (9th ed.). Harlow: Longman.
  • Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen 2007. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Biber, Douglas. 2012. “Register as a Predictor of Linguistic Variation.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6.1: 9–37.
  • Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and R. Harald Baayen 2007. “Predicting the Dative Alternation.” Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Ed. Gerlof Bouma, Irene Kramer, and Joost Zwarts. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science. 69–94.
  • Brunner, Thomas. 2014. “Structural Nativization, Typology and Complexity: Noun Phrase Structures in British, Kenyan and Singaporean English.” English Language and Linguistics 18: 23–48. doi: 10.1017/S1360674313000269
  • Collins, John. 2014. The Nature of Linguistics Variables. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Croft, William. 2000. “Typology.” The Blackwell Handbook of Linguistics. Ed. Mark Aronoff , and Janie Rees-Miller. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 337–368.
  • De Haan, Pieter. 1993. “Sentence Length in Running Text.” Corpus-based Computational Linguistics. Ed. Clive Souter, and Eric Atwell. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 147–161.
  • Gisborne, Nikolas. 2003. “Relative Clauses in Hong Kong English. ” World Englishes 19: 357–371. doi: 10.1111/1467-971X.00184
  • Görlach, Manfred. 1998. “Varieties of English World-Wide: Where We Stand.” Links & Letters 5: 13–36.
  • Gut, Ulrike. 2014. International Corpus of English (Nigeria). http://ice-corpora. net/ICE/INDEX.HTM
  • Hawkins, John A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoff rey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hudson-Ettle, Diana, and Tore Nilsson. 2002. “Orality and Noun Phrase Structure in Registers of British and Kenya English.” ICAME Journal 26: 33–62.
  • Jucker, Andreas H. 1992. Social Stylistics: Syntactic Variation in British Newspapers. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Lamidi, Mufutau T. 2007. “The Noun Phrase Structure in Nigerian English.” Studia Anglica Posnaniesia 42: 238–250.
  • Meunier, Fanny. 2000. “A Corpus Linguistics Approach to Interlanguage Grammar: Noun Phrase Complexity in Advanced Learner Writing.” PhD diss, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.
  • Schilk, Marco, and Steff en Schaub 2016. “Noun Phrase Complexity Across Varieties of English: Focus on Syntactic Function and Text Type.” English World-Wide 37.1: 58–85.
  • Schils, Erik, and Pieter De Haan. 1993. “Sentence Length in Running Text.” Corpus-based Computational Linguistics. Ed. Clive Souter, and Eric Atwell. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 147–161.
  • Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tagliamonte, Sali, and R. Harald Baayen. 2012. “Models, Forests, and Trees of York English: Was/Were Variation as a Case Study for Statistical Practice.” Language Variation and Change 24.2: 135–178. doi:10.1017/S0954394512000129
  • Wahid, Ridwan. 2013. “Definite Article Usage Across Varieties of English.” World Englishes 32.1: 23–41.
  • Wasow, Tom. 2002. Postverbal Behavior. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
  • Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carletta, Gregory Garretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew KoontzGarboden, Tatiana Nikitina, M. Catherine O’Connor, and Tom Wasow. 2004. “Animacy Encoding in English: Why and How.” Paper presented at ACL Workshop on discourse annotation, Barcelona.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.