PL EN


2013 | 137 | 141-162
Article title

The New Approach for the Project Activities Classification and its Application in the Critical Chain Buffer Management Method

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The outline of the paper is as follows: in section 1 the goal of this paper is defined. In section 2, the most complex section of the paper, we present the summary of existing knowledge in this matter by reviewing the literature, critical factors of project's success, contingency theory, project typology, project activities classification. Section 3 explains the applied research methodology, the process of building theory from case study. In section 4 the new approach for the project activities typology is introduced, classification of project activities from the angle of five dimensions. In section 5 the application of the proposed approach in the CC/BM is presented, incorporating five identified activities dimension in the buffer sizing procedure. Section 6 contains some conclusions. The goal of this paper is presenting the typology of projects and proposes a new approach for typology of projects activities to define the impact of this factor on the size of inserted buffers in the Critical Chain Buffer Management Method (Goldratt 1997), solution applied in order to cope with inherent uncertainty associated with many projects. The presented classification was compiled from the analysis of the completed or still executed infrastructure and it projects which are performed as well by Polish public institutions, supported by European Union, and private sector.
Year
Volume
137
Pages
141-162
Physical description
Contributors
References
  • Ahituv N., Neumann S. (1984), A flexible approach to information system development. "MIS Quarterly" June, 69-78.
  • Blake S.B. (1978), Managing for Responsive Research and Development. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
  • Burns T., Stalker G. (1961), The management of innovation. Tavistock, London.
  • Cash J.I.Jr., McFarlan W.F., McKenney J.L. (1988), Corporate Information Systems Management. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
  • Drazin R, van de Ven A.H. (1985), Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. "Administrative Science Quarterly", 30, 514-39.
  • Eisenhardt K.M. (1989), Building theories from case study research. "Acad. Manag. Rev.", 14(4), 532-50.
  • Goldratt E.M. (1997), Critical Chain. North River Press, Great Barrington, MA.
  • Kelley J., Walker M. (1959), Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling. Proceedings of the Eastern Joint Computer Conference.
  • Kerzner H. (1994), Project Management: a Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 5th ed. Van Nostrand, New York.
  • Kuchta D., Slusarczyk A., Verhulst, Huyghe W., Lauryssen K., Debal T. A comparison of buffer sizing techniques in a consulting environment: a real life project in a government setting. Working paper.
  • Lawrence P.R., Lorsch J.W. (1967), Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston.
  • Moder J. (1988), Network techniques in project management. in: D.I. Cleland and W.R. King: Project Management Handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY pp. 324-373.
  • Pearson A.W. (1990), Innovation strategy. "Technovation" 10(3), 185-192.
  • Pennings J.M. (1992), Structural contingency theory: a reappraisal. "Research Organizational Behavior", 14, 267-309.
  • Sauser B.J., Reilly R.R., Shenhar A.J. (2009), Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights - a comparative analysis of NASA's Mars Climate Orbiter loss. "International Journal of Project Management" 27, 665-679.
  • Shenhar A.J. (1998), From theory to practice. Toward a typology of project management styles. "IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag.", 45(1), 33-47.
  • Shenhar A.J. (2001), One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains. "Management Science", 47(3), 394-414.
  • Shenhar A.J., Dvir D. (1996), Toward a typological theory of project management. "Research Policy" 25, 607-632.
  • Shenhar A.J., Dvir D. (2007), Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business, Boston.
  • Shenhar A.J., Wideman R.M. (1997), Toward a Fundamental Differentiation between Project Types. PICMET Management and Engineering Conference, Portland, OR.
  • Steele L.W. (1975), Innovation in Big Business. Elsevier, New York.
  • Vanhoucke M. (2011), Project management. Course Book. Academia Press/Gent.
  • Wheelwright S.C., Clark K.B. (1992), Revolutionizing Product Development. The Free Press, New York.
  • www.projectmanagementguru.com, 04.04.2012.
  • www.systemsplanning.com, 05.04.2012.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
2083-8611
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-2c83b7bd-98d5-4c43-a312-ff09298de800
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.