The ‘inadequacy of her resistance’: Reading Eighteenth-Century Rape Trials in Peter Teuthold’s The Necromancer

• Authors: Mangan Christine
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

Once thought to be the fictitious creations of Jane Austen, the seven Gothic novels that comprise the ‘Northanger ‘Horrid’ Novels’ have been critically neglected since their rediscovery in the early twentieth century. This paper engages with ideas of absence and exclusion within the ‘horrid’ novel The Necromancer by Peter Teuthold, in order to consider the historical (mis)construction of women by male voices in eighteenth-century rape trials. Particular emphasis is placed on an embedded narrative within the text that subversely explores the ways in which the female voice is subsequently read and mis(constructed), so that the narrative is ‘structured’ and ‘arranged’ to construct a version of a woman at odds with femininity, one that ultimately deviates from ‘the natural order.’

Keywords

EN

Peter Teuthold; Gothic; Eighteenth-century; Gender Studies; History; Law

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2016
• Issue: 25/1
• Pages: 47-58

Contributors

author

Mangan Christine

References

• Argus (London, England), Friday, Oct. 29, 1790; Issue 513. 17th–18th Century Burney Collection Newspapers Database.
• Beattie, J. M. 1986. Crime and the Courts in England 1660–1800. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Blackstone, William. 1774. Commentaries on the Laws of England. The sixth edition. London, MDCCLXXIV. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale. University College Dublin. 13 Oct. 2011.
• Cass, Jeffrey. 2007. “Queering The Necromancer.” The Necromancer 1794. Chicago: Valancourt Books. xii–xxx.
• Clark, Anna. 2009. Women’s Silence, Men’s Violence: Sexual Assault in England 1770–1845. London: Routledge.
• Dickie, Simon. 2011. Cruelty and Laughter: Forgotten Comic Literature and the Unsentimental Eighteenth Century. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
• Durston, Gregory. 2005. “Rape in the Eighteenth-Century Metropolis: Part 1.” British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 28. 2: 167–179. —.
• Durston, Gregory.2005. “Rape in the Eighteenth-Century Metropolis: Part 2.” British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 28. 2: 15–31
• Edelstein, Laurie. 1998. “An Accusation Easily to be Made? Rape and Malicious Prosecution in Eighteenth-Century England.” The American Journal of Legal History 42. 4: 351–390.
• Farr, Samuel. 1814. Elements of Medical Jurisprudence: Or a Succinct and Compendious Description of Such Tokens in the Human Body as are requisite to determine the Judgment of a Coroner, and Courts of Law in cases of Divorce, Rape, Murder &c. London: Printed for J. Callow.
• Gazetteer and New Daily Advertiser (London, England), Friday, Oct. 29, 1790, Issue 19313. 17th–18th Century Burney Collection Newspapers Database.
• Hawkins, William. 1824. In a Treatise of the Pleas of the Crown. London: Printed for S. Sweet.
• Howell, T. B., ed. 1816. “Trial of Elizabeth Canning.” A Complete Collection of State Trials and Proceedings for High Treason and Other Crimes and Misdemeanors. London: Printed by T. C. Howard.
• Hufton, Olwen. 1995. The Prospect Before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe, Volume 1 1500–1800. New York: Random House.
• Kermode, Jenny and Garthine Walker. 1995. “Introduction.” Women, Crime and the Courts in Early Modern England. Chapel Hills: University of North Carolina 58 Press. 1–25.
• Langbein, John H. 1983. “Shaping the Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial: A View from the Ryder Sources.” Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 546. http:// digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/546.
• Langbein, John H. 1978. “The Criminal Trial Before the Lawyers.” Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 542. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/542.
• Langbein, John H. 2003. The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mills, Jennie. 2009. “Rape in Early Eighteenth-Century London: A Perversion ‘so very perplex’d.” Sexual Perversions 1670–1890. Ed. Julie Peakman. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 140–166.
• Oldham, James. 2012. “The indispensability of manuscript cases notes to eighteenth-century barristers and judges.” Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies. Ed. Anthony Musson and Chantal Stebbings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 30–52.
• Old Bailey Proceedings Online (www.oldbaileyonline.org, version 7.0, 07 March 2013), October 1790, trial of Thomas Bolton (t17901027–80).
• Review of The Necromancer. The Critical Review, Vol. 11 (1794): 469.
• Simpson, Anthony. 2004. “Popular Perceptions of Rape as a Capital Crime in Eighteenth-Century England: The Press and the Trial of Francis Charters in the Old Bailey, February 1730.” Law and History Review 22. 1: 27–70.
• Teuthold, Peter. 2007. [1794]. The Necromancer. Chicago: Valancourt Press.
• The Humours of the Old Bailey; or, Justice Shaking her Sides. 1772. London: Sold by P. Wicks.