Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 4(153) | 7–26

Article title

Rola państwowej własności korporacyjnej — pomiędzy budowaniem wartości spółek a odpowiedzialnym rozwojem

Content

Title variants

EN
The role of state-owned enterprises – between building enterprise value and responsible development

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
State-owned enterprises are subject to numerous analyses around the world. In many studies, they had been assessed critically. Nevertheless, the state remains the owner of companies in many countries, in particular in strategic sectors of the economy. The article reviews and synthesizes results and conclusions of Polish and foreign studies on state-owned companies. On their basis, it also proposes recommendations for companies and regulators. The main aim of the paper is to assess the significance and causes of state ownership, to indicate areas in which state ownership can be more effective than private ownership as well as factors that may contribute to the improvement of the functioning of state-owned enterprises.

Year

Issue

Pages

7–26

Physical description

Contributors

  • Dr hab., prof. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Wydział Zarządzania, leszek.bohdanowicz@uni.lodz.pl, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-070X

References

  • Adamska A., Mechanizmy sprawowania kontroli w spółkach publicznych z udziałem Skarbu Państwa, „Zarządzanie i Finanse” 2013, nr 2–6.
  • Aluchna M., Dobre praktyki corporate governance: Światowe tendencje a polskie doświadczenia, „e-mentor” 2008, nr 2.
  • Bałtowski M., Kwiatkowski G., Modele funkcjonowania i nadzoru państwa nad przedsiębiorstwami państwowymi, „Gospodarka Narodowa” 2014, nr 4.
  • Bebchuk L.A., Fried J.M., Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem, „Journal of Economic Perspectives” 2003, t. 17, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.364220.
  • Boubakri N., Cosset J.-C., The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries, „Journal of Finance” 1998, t. 53, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00044.
  • Boycko M., Shleifer A., Vishny R., A Theory of Privatisation, „Economic Journal” 1996, t. 106.
  • Boyd B.K., Franco Santos M., Shen W., International Developments in Executive Compensation, „Corporate Governance: An International Review” 2012, t. 20, nr 6, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00934.x.
  • Böwer U., State-Owned Enterprises in Emerging Europe: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, IMF Working Paper 2017, <https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2017/10/30/State-Owned-Enterprises-in-Emerging-Europe-The-Good-the-Bad-and-the-Ugly-45181>.
  • Bozec R., Dia M., Board structure and firm technical efficiency: Evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises, „European Journal of Operational Research” 2007, t. 177, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.001.
  • Bremer I., The end of the free market. Who wins the war between states and corporations?, Portfolio, New York 2010.
  • Clarke G., Cull R., Shirley M.M., Bank privatization in developing countries: A summary of lessons and findings, „Journal of Banking and Finance” 2005, t. 29, nr 8–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.006.
  • Conyon M.J., Peck S.I., Sadler G.V., Compensation Consultants and Executive Pay. WSRC Paper 2006/3-1, Wharton-SMU Research Center 2006.
  • Cuervo-Cazurra A., Inkpen A., Muacchio A., Ramaswamy K., Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies, „Journal of International Business Studies” 2014, t. 45, nr 8, https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.43.
  • Cuervo A., Villalonga B., Explaining the variance in the performance effects of privatization, „Academy of Management Review” 2000, t. 25, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3363520.
  • Czernis M., Nowe zasady wynagrodzeń w spółkach z udziałem m.in. Skarbu Państwa, <http://www.czernis.pl/public/pdf/newsletter_get/7.pdf>.
  • Dai B., Liu X., Hao Y., Executive Power, Compensation Contract and SOEs Reform — Evidence from Listed SOEs in China, „Modern Economic Science” 2011, t. 33, nr 4.
  • de Fuentes C., Dutrénit G., Best Channels of Academia — Industry Interaction for Long-Term Benefit, Research Policy 2012, t. 41, nr 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.026.
  • DeWenter K.L., Malatesta P.H., State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity, „American Economic Review” 2001, t. 91, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.320.
  • Feng F., Sun Q., Tong W., Do government-linked companies necessarily underperform?, Working Paper, Nanyang University, Singapore 2002.
  • Fong W.M., Lam K.C.K., Privatization and Performance: The Experience of Firms in China, „The Chinese Economy” 2004, t. 37, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2004.11033501.
  • Freeman R.E., Strategic Management: A Stakeholders Approach, Pitman, Boston 1984.
  • Frydman R., Gray Ch.W., Hessel M., Rapaczynski A., When Does Privatization Work? The Impact of Private Ownership and Corporate Performance in Transition Economies, „Quarterly Journal of Economies” 1999, t. 114, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556241.
  • Gedajlovic E.R., Shapiro D.M., Management and Ownership Effects: Evidence from Five Countries, „Strategic Management Journal” 1998, t. 19, nr 6.
  • Goldeng E., Grünfeld L.A., Benito G.R.G., The Performance Differential between Private and State Owned Enterprises: The Roles of Ownership, Management and Market Structure, „Journal of Management Studies” 2008, t. 45, nr 7, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00790.x.
  • Heracleous L., State Ownership, Privatization and Performance in Singapore: An Exploratory Study from a Strategic Management Perspective, „Asia Pacific Journal of Management” 2001, t. 18, nr 1.
  • Hillman A., Cannella A., Paetzold R., The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change, „Journal of Management Studies” 2000, t. 37, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179.
  • Karman J., Nowa konstrukcja instytucji „złotego veta”, „Przegląd Corporate Governance”
  • 2009, nr 4.
  • Koładkiewicz I., Dobre praktyki ładu korporacyjnego oraz ich transfer do twardego prawa. Perspektywa interesariuszy polskiego rynku kapitałowego, „Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne” 2014, t. XCI/2.
  • Koładkiewicz I., Rady nadzorcze — dobre praktyki ładu korporacyjnego: Doświadczenie polskie i zagraniczne, Poltext, Warszawa 2013.
  • Krześnicki J., Nowa ustawa kominowa w akcji. Na co mogą liczyć zarządy spółek Skarbu Państwa?, <https://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/Nowa-ustawa-kominowa-w-akcji-Na-co-moga-liczyczarzady-spolek-Skarbu-Panstwa-7536626.html>.
  • Kwiatkowski G., Właścicielska rola państwa we współczesnej gospodarce, „Studia Ekonomiczne Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie” 2015, nr 2009.
  • Kwiatkowski G., Własność państwowa a rola państwa we współczesnej gospodarce, „Studia Ekonomiczne Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach” 2013, nr 139.
  • Laffonte J.-J., Tirole J., A theory of incentives in regulation and procurement, MIT Press, Cambridge 1993.
  • Le V.T., Buck T., State ownership and listed firm performance: a universally negative governance relationship?, „Journal of Management and Governance” 2011, t. 15, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9098-5.
  • Majumdar S.K., Assessing Comparative Efficiency of the State-Owned, Mixed, and Private Sectors in Indian Industry, „Public Choice” 1998, t. 96, nr 1–2.
  • Mak Y.T., Li Y., Determinants of Corporate Ownership and Board Structure: Evidence from Singapore, „Journal of Corporate Finance” 2001, t. 7, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-1199(01)00021-9.
  • Marcinkowska M., Zasady ładu korporacyjnego dla banków, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie” 2014, nr 10, s. 93–105, https://doi.org/10.15678/znuek.2014.0934.1007.
  • Marszałek A., Relacje między światem nauki i przemysłu, „e-mentor” 2014, nr 4.
  • Megginson W.L., Nash R.C., van Randenborgh M., The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis, „Journal of Finance” 1994, t. 49, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.2307/2329158.
  • Megginson W.L., Netter J.M., From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization, „Journal of Economic Literature” 2001, t. 39, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.39.2.321.
  • Ncube F., Maunganidze L., Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation in Zimbabwean State Owned Enterprises: A Case of Institutionalized Predation, „Management” 2014, t. 4, nr 6.
  • Okten C., Arin K.P., How Does Privatization Affect the Firm’s Efficiency and Technology Choice?: Evidence from Turkey, Mimeo, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 2002.
  • Omran M., The Performance of State-Owned Enterprises and Newly Privatized Firms: Does Privatization Really Matter?, „World Development” 2004, t. 32, nr 6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.01.006.
  • Oplustil K., Instrumenty nadzoru korporacyjnego (corporate governance) w spółce akcyjnej, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2010.
  • Park J., Bobeva-Filipova D.N., Dimitrov M.A., Keremidchiev S.V., Tchipev P.D., Governance Innovation for SOEs in Bulgaria: Based on Korean Experience in 31 Questions, [w:] 2015/16 Knowledge Sharing Program with Bulgaria: Policy Studies for Bulgaria’s Sustainable Growth — Enhancing Innovation and Accountability, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Republic of Korea, Seoul 2016.
  • Postuła I., Nadzór korporacyjny w Spółkach Skarbu Państwa, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2013 Postuła I., Problemy polityki personalnej w radach nadzorczych spółek Skarbu Państwa, „Problemy Zarządzania” 2011, nr 4."
  • Razak N.H., Ahmad R., Aliahmed H.J., Government Ownership and Performance: An Analysis of listed companies in Malaysia, „Corporate Ownership & Control” 2008, t. 6, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i2c4p2.
  • Rudolf S., Przedstawicielstwo pracownicze w organach nadzoru korporacyjnego — tendencje zmian, [w:] Ekonomiczne i społeczne problemy nadzoru korporacyjnego, red. S. Rudolf, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2004.
  • Steurer R., The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterizing public policies on CSR in Europe, „Policy Science” 2010, t. 43, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9084-4.
  • Szarzec K., Nowara W., The economic performance of state-owned enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe, „Post-Communiest Economies” 2017, t. 29, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2017.1316546.
  • Urban D., Państwowe fundusze majątkowe. Pomiędzy krajową gospodarką a globalnymi rynkami finansowymi, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2017.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-2cd2d130-345e-4f32-a34f-d8b5a645642d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.