PL EN


Journal
2015 | 23 | 1(89) | 39-57
Article title

Modal Difficulties with Singular Propositions

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Singular propositions are structured entities which sometimes include macroscopic concrete things as their elements. That leads to numerous difficulties, also those concerning modalities, good example of which is the famous argument developed by Plantinga, who concludes that accepting a theory of singular propositions leads to necessary existence of (apparently contingent) objects — elements of such propositions. In the paper I present a possible way to avoid such harmful consequences and to undermine Plantinga’s reasoning. My approach involves the idea of two modes of evaluating propositions: “in a possible world” and “with regard to a possible world”, which I try to defend by introducing some solutions from the Hybrid Theory of proper names. I also argue that disposing of singular propositions and accepting Descriptivism does not allow to deal with the modal difficulties.
Journal
Year
Volume
23
Issue
Pages
39-57
Physical description
Contributors
  • Zakład Semiotyki Logicznej, Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 3, 00-927 Warszawa, f.kawczynski@uw.edu.pl
References
  • Adams R. M. (1981), Actualism and Thisness, „Synthese” 49(1), 3-41.
  • Armstrong D. M. (1997), A World of State of Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crisp T. (2010), Presentism [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, M. Loux, D. Zimmerman (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 211-245.
  • Donnellan K. S. (1966), Reference and Definite Descriptions, „The Philosophical Review” 75(3), 281-304.
  • Evans G. (2002), The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fine K. (2005), Plantinga on the Reduction of Possibilist Discourse [in:] Modality and Tense. Philosophical Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 176-213.
  • Grygianiec M. (2007), Identyczność i trwanie. Studium ontologiczne, Warszawa: Semper.
  • Jubien M. (2009), Ontology, Modality, and the Fallacy of Reference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kaplan D. (1989), Demonstratives [in:] Themes from Kaplan, J. Almog, J. Perry, H. Wettstein (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 481-563.
  • Kawczyński F. (2007), O atrybutywnych i referencyjnych użyciach deskrypcji określonych, „Filozofia Nauki” 4(60), 15-35.
  • Kawczyński F. (2010), The Hybrid Theory of Reference for Proper Names [in:] Philosophy of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 1. The Formal Turn, P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 137-150.
  • King J. (2007), The Nature and Structure of Content, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kripke S. (1984), Naming and Necessity, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Linsky B., Zalta E. N. (1994), In Defense of the Simplest Quantified Modal Logic, „Philosophical Perspectives” 8, 431-458.
  • Loux M. J. (1998), Metaphysics. A Contemporary Introduction, London: Routledge.
  • Plantinga A. (1982), The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Plantinga A. (1983), On Existentialism, „Philosophical Studies” 44(1), 1-20.
  • Russell B. (2008), The Principles of Mathematics, Merchant Books.
  • Salmon N. (2005), Nonexistence [in:] Metaphysics, Mathematics, and Meaning. Philosophical Papers I, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 50-90.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-2d324236-1ecd-4adf-85c0-29b0243f9cf5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.