2016 | 40 | 21-29
Article title

Interpreting the legacy of partition in the subcontinent: Indian and Pakistani perspectives

Title variants
Languages of publication
The twentieth century partitions, it has been argued, have been essentially the by‑products of three interlinked global developments: (a) decolonisation; (b) democratisation and the (c) Cold War dynamics. The partition of the Indian subcontinent, in particular, bore the imprint of the maelstrom produced by the intertwining of these three forces. The process of partition in South Asia did not only involve simple division and reorganisation of territories but was accompanied by devolution and indigenisation of political institutions and governance, placing partition at the heart of the process of nation‑state formation. In this sense, the longue duree process of the partitioning of the subcontinent has continued to cast its long shadow over the nation‑building process leading to internal discrepancies and the development of regional dynamics, often competitive and conflictual in nature.
  • University of Calcutta, India
  • Ahsan A., The Indus Saga and the Making of Pakistan, Karachi 1996.
  • Auden W.H., Collected Poems, ed. E. Mendelson, New York 1976.
  • Baruah S., ‘The Partition’s Long Shadow: The Ambiguities of Citizenship in Assam, India,’ Citizenship Studies, Vol. 13, No. 6 (2009), at <>.
  • Behuria A.K., ‘Myth of the Monolith: The Challenge of Diversity in Pakistan,’ Strategic Analysis, Vol. 29, No. 1 (2005).
  • Gills B., Rocamora J., ‘Low Intensity Democracy,’ Third World Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3 (1992).
  • Gilmartin D., ‘Partition, Pakistan, and South Asian History: In Search of a Narrative,’ The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 57, No. 4 (1998), at <>.
  • Kapur A., ‘Major Powers and the Persistence of the India‑Pakistan Conflict’ in T.V. Paul (ed.), The India‑Pakistan Conflict. An Enduring Rivalry, Cambridge 2005.
  • Khan R., Pakistan, a Dream Gone Sour, New York 1997.
  • Kumar R., ‘The Troubled History of Partition,’ Foreign Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 1 (1997), at <>.
  • Mattoo A., ‘India‑Pakistan Relations: Towards a Grand Reconciliation’ in S. Das, S. Chakrabarti (eds.), Challenges of Nation‑building in Developing Societies. Vignettes from West and South Asia, Kolkata 2009 (Monograph (University of Calcutta. Department of History), 30).
  • Nasr V., ‘National Identities and the India‑Pakistan Conflict’ in T.V. Paul (ed.), The India‑Pakistan Conflict. An Enduring Rivalry, Cambridge 2005.
  • Purewal N., ‘The Indo‑Pak Border: Displacements, Aggressions and Transgressions,’ Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 12, No. 4 (2003), at < 194363>.
  • Rajmaira S., ‘Indo‑Pakistani Relations: Reciprocity in Long‑Term Perspective,’ International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 3 (1997), at <‑8833.00056>.
  • Shaikh F., Making Sense of Pakistan, New York 2009. Schendel Willem van, The Bengal Borderland: Beyond State and Nation in South Asia, London 2005 (Anthem South Asian Studies).
  • Sherman T.C., Gould W., Ansari S., ‘From Subjects to Citizens: Society and the Everyday State in India and Pakistan, 1947‑1970,’ Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 45, No. 1 (2010).
  • Tan Tai Yong, Kudaisya G., The Aftermath of Partition in South Asia, London 2000 (Routledge Studies in the Modern History of Asia).
  • Thornton T.P., ‘Pakistan: Fifty Years of Insecurity’ in S.S. Harrison, P.H. Kreisberg, D. Kux (eds.), India and Pakistan: The First Fifty Years, Washington DC 1999 (Woodrow Wilson Center Series).
  • Yasmeen S., Dixit A., Confidence‑Building Measures in South Asia, Washington DC 1995 (Occasional Paper (Henry L. Stimson Center), 24).
  • Zamindar V.F.‑Y., The Long Partition and the Making of on Modern South Asia. Refugees, Boundaries, Histories, New York 2007 (Cultures of History).
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.