PL EN


2016 | 25/1 | 59-71
Article title

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus: Friendship, Monstrosity and Radical Otherness

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
This essay looks at the relationship between Victor Frankenstein and his Creature, examining the ethical implications of Victor’s hostility towards the Creature. This problem is considered with reference to the views of various philosophers, ancient and modern, stressing one’s responsibility for the Other and the importance of the Self’s will to befriend another being. It is argued that Shelley indeed presents the Creature as “befriendable.” Such presentation, this article indicates, is a consequence of Shelley’s sympathy for the rejected and persecuted and her insistence on parental responsibility – the ideas actually emphasised in the novel, yet passed over in the 1930’s Hollywood production, as a consequence, permanently affecting the popular image of the Creature.
Contributors
author
References
  • Annas, Julia. 1997. “Plato and Aristotle on Friendship and Altruism.” Mind 86. 344: 532–554.
  • Aristotle. 1998. “Nicomachean Ethics: Book 8.” Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Books VIII and IX. Ed. Michael Pakaluk. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bernatchez, Josh. 2009. “Monstrosity, Suffering, Subjectivity, and Sympathetic Community in Frankenstein and The Structure of Torture.” Science Fiction Studies 36. 2: 205–216.
  • Brewer, Talbot. 2005. “Virtues We Can Share: Friendship and Aristotelian Ethical Theory.” Ethics 115. 4: 721–758.
  • Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Friendship. 1991.” Other Selves: Philosophers on Friendship. Ed. Michael Pakaluk. New York: Hackett Publishing Company.
  • Garasic, Mirko D. 2013. “What Love Means to a Creature.” Frankenstein and Philosophy: The Shocking Truth, Philosophy and Pop Culture Series. Ed. N. Michaud. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
  • Kant, Immanuel. 1991. “Lecture on Friendship.” Other Selves: Philosophers on Friendship. Ed. Michael Pakaluk. New York: Hackett Publishing Company.
  • Kirmayer, Laurence J. 2008. “Empathy and Alterity in Cultural Psychiatry.” Ethos, Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 36. 4: 457–474.
  • Kwok-ying, Lau. 2005. “Non-Familiarity and Otherness: Derrida’s Hermeneutics of Friendship and Its Political Implications.” Phenomenology: Selected Essays from Asia 1: 409–429.
  • O’Rourke, James. 1989. „Nothing More Unnatural: Mary Shelley’s Revision of Rousseau.” A Journal of English Literary History 56. 3: 543–569.
  • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques and J. M. Cohen. 1953. The Confessions of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. London: Penguin Books. Project Gutenberg. Web. 15 Dec 2015.
  • Ryan, Robert M. 1988. “Mary Shelley’s Christian Monster.” The Wordsworth Circle – A Journal of Romantic Studies 19. 3: 150–155.
  • Sawyer, Robert. 2007. “Mary Shelley and Shakespeare: Monstrous Creations.” South Atlantic Review 72. 2: 15–31.
  • Shelley, Mary. 1999. Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus. London: Wordsworth Editions.
  • Walhof, Darren R. 2006. “Friendship, Otherness, and Gadamer’s Politics of Solidarity.” Peer Reviewed Articles. Michigan: Grand Valley State University.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-2e96864b-8434-4821-b032-839dffb9c9b0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.