Promises and Perils of Platform Work’s Availability and Flexibility: A Case Study of Delivery Riders and ‘Taxi’ Drivers in Poland

• Authors: Jancewicz Barbara , Jóźwiak Ignacy
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Platforms such as Uber, Bolt, Wolt, or Glovo, are often depicted as villains – the employers disguised as intermediaries who aim to exploit their workers. Even when researchers admit that platform workers often view platform work positively, they interpret these views as study participants’ failure to recognize their objective interests. The article presents a mixed-method study conducted among migrant and non-migrant couriers and drivers working with platforms in Poland. Not assuming platforms’ negative impact, we focus on employment flexibility and availability, and how these translate into platform work’s role as: 1) labor market entry points, 2) work of last resort, 3) precarious employment, and 4) opportunity for transitory or flexible income. We find that workers’ migratory status is crucial to their experience of platform work. However, it appears that platform workers’ situation is less about the platforms themselves and more about the broader legal and economic environment that offers few alternatives to platform work.

Keywords

EN

platform work; platform economy; gig economy; migration; migrant labor

• Publisher: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Studia Socjologiczne
• Year: 2025
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 113-136

Contributors

author

Jancewicz Barbara

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

author

Jóźwiak Ignacy

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

References

• Adermon, A., & Hensvik, L. (2022). Gig-jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends? Labour Economics, 76, 102171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102171
• Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–Family Conflict and Flexible Work Arrangements: Deconstructing Flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
• Altenried, M. (2021). Mobile workers, contingent labour: Migration, the gig economy and the multiplication of labour. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Spa- ce, 0308518X2110548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211054846
• Anderson, B. (2010). Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of pre- carious workers. Work, Employment and Society, 24(2), 300–317. https://doi. org/10.1177/0950017010362141
• Beręsewicz, M., & Nikulin, D. (2021). COVID-19 and the gig economy in Poland. arXiv:2107.11124 [Econ, q-Fin, Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11124
• Beręsewicz, M., Nikulin, D., Szymkowiak, M., & Wilak, K. (2021). The gig economy in Poland: Evidence based on mobile big data. arXiv:2106.12827 [Econ, q-Fin, Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12827
• Gebrial, D. (2022). Racial platform capitalism: Empire, migration and the ma- king of Uber in London. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 0308518X2211154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221115439
• Glavin, P., & Schieman, S. (2022). Dependency and Hardship in the Gig Economy: The Mental Health Consequences of Platform Work. Socius, 8, 23780231221082414. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221082414
• Heiland, H. (2022). Neither timeless, nor placeless: Control of food delivery gig work via place-based working time regimes. Human Relations, 75(9), 1824–1848. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211025283
• Holtum, P. J., Irannezhad, E., Marston, G., & Mahadevan, R. (2022). Busi- ness or Pleasure? A Comparison of Migrant and Non-Migrant Uber Dri- vers in Australia. Work, Employment and Society, 36(2), 290–309. https://doi. org/10.1177/09500170211034741
• Inanc, H. (2020). Varieties of Precarity: How Insecure Work Manifests Itself, Affects Well-Being, and Is Shaped by Social Welfare Institutions and Labor Market Policies. Work and Occupations, 47(4), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888420934539
• Jóźwiak, I. (2020). Czasowość i sprawczość w świetle koncepcji prekarności: Wnioski z badań nad migracjami pracowniczymi z Ukrainy do Polski. Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 178(4), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.4467/25444972SM
• PP.20.043.12780
• Kaczmarczyk, P., Kowalik, Z., & Lewandowski, P. (2022). Job quality gaps between
• migrant and native gig workers: Evidence from Poland. IBS Working Paper, WP 09/2022. https://ibs.org.pl/en/publications/job-quality-gaps-between-migrant-and- native-gig-workers-evidence-from-poland/
• Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2017). The Role of Unemployment in the Rise in Alter- native Work Arrangements. American Economic Review, 107(5), 388–392. https:// doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171092
• Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practi- ces and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106. https://doi. org/10.1177/0018726709349199
• Kowalik, Z., Lewandowski, P., & Kaczmarczyk, P. (2024). Job Quality Gaps Between Migrant and Native Platform Workers: Evidence From Poland. New Technology, Work and Employment. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12322
• Kreshpaj, B., Orellana, C., Burström, B., Davis, L., Hemmingsson, T., Johansson, G., Kjellberg, K., Jonsson, J., Wegman, D. H., & Bodin, T. (2020). What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from qu- antitative and qualitative studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 46(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3875
• Kröll, C., & Nüesch, S. (2019). The effects of flexible work practices on employee attitudes: Evidence from a large-scale panel study in Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(9), 1505–1525. https://doi.org/10.1 080/09585192.2017.1289548
• Lam, L., & Triandafyllidou, A. (2021). An unlikely stepping stone? Exploring how platform work shapes newcomer migrant integration. Transitions: Journal of Tran- sient Migration, 5(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1386/tjtm_00029_1
• Lam, L., & Triandafyllidou, A. (2022). Road to nowhere or to somewhere? Migrant pathways in platform work in Canada. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 0308518X2210902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221090248
• Lewis, H., Dwyer, P., Hodkinson, S., & Waite, L. (2015). Hyper-precarious lives: Mi- grants, work and forced labour in the Global North. Progress in Human Geogra- phy, 39(5), 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514548303
• Mazur, J., & Serafin, M. (2023). Stalling the State: How Digital Platforms Contribute to and Profit From Delays in the Enforcement and Adoption of Regulations. Com- parative Political Studies, 56(1), 101–130.
• Milkman, R., Elliott-Negri, L., Griesbach, K., & Reich, A. (2021). Gender, Class, and the Gig Economy: The Case of Platform-Based Food Delivery. Critical Sociology, 47(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520949631
• Millar, K. M. (2017). Toward a critical politics of precarity. Sociology Compass, 11(6), e12483. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12483
• Mrugała, G., Tomczyk, I., & Kilichowski, A. (2023). Cudzoziemcy w polskim systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych 2022. Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych: Departament Statystyki i Prognoz. https://www.zus.pl/baza-wiedzy/statystyka/opracowania-tematyczne/cudzoziemcy
• Piasna, A., Zwysen, W., & Drahokoupil, J. (2022). The platform economy in Europe Results from the second ETUI Internet and Platform Work Survey (2022.05; etui Working Paper). European Trade Union Institute.
• Polkowska, D. (2019). Does the App Contribute to the Precarization of Work? The Case of Uber Drivers in Poland. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 12(3). http://siba-ese. unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/21275/17978
• Polkowska, D., & Mika, B. (2022). Is it possible to outsmart Uber? Individual working tactics within platform work in Poland. European Societies, 1–21. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14616696.2022.2156578
• Polkowska, D., Podgórska, K., Kolasa-Nowak, A., Nowakowski, M., Dyczewski, B., & Filipek, K. (2022). BARMIG Project National Report POLAND. Maria Curie- -Skłodowska University. https://phavi.umcs.pl/at/attachments/2022/0830/115049- -barmig-project-national-report.pdf
• Purcell, C., & Brook, P. (2022). At Least I’m My Own Boss! Explaining Consent, Coercion and Resistance in Platform Work. Work, Employment and Society, 36(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020952661
• Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020). Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society, 49(5–6), 833–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y
• Sun, P., Yujie Chen, J., & Rani, U. (2023). From Flexible Labour to ‘Sticky La- bour’: A Tracking Study of Workers in the Food-Delivery Platform Econo- my of China. Work, Employment and Society, 37(2), 412–431. https://doi. org/10.1177/09500170211021570
• Tusińska, M. (2023). Motives and expectations of platform workers in Poland. Ekono- mia i Prawo, 22(2), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2023.022
• Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-soc-121919-054857
• Van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communica- tion & Society, 20(6), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194
• Van Doorn, N., Ferrari, F., & Graham, M. (2023). Migration and Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy: An Intervention. Work, Employment and Society, 37(4), 1099–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221096581
• van Doorn, N., & Vijay, D. (2021). Gig work as migrant work: The platformization of migration infrastructure. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 0308518X211065049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211065049
• Zhou, Y. (2022). Trapped in the platform: Migration and precarity in China’s plat- form-based gig economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 0308518X2211191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221119196

Identifiers

DOI

DOI: 10.24425/sts.2025.154173