PL EN


Journal
2019 | 9(66/2) | 285-314
Article title

Funkcja 1Hen 9,1-3 w strukturze literackiej mitu o upadłych aniołach 1Hen 6–11

Authors
Content
Title variants
EN
The Function of 1 En. 9:1-3 in the Literary Structure of the Myth of the Fallen Watchers (1 Enoch 6–11)
Languages of publication
PL EN FR DE IT
Abstracts
EN
The article analyzes the structure of 1 En. 9:1-3 and its function within the larger structure of the myth of the fallen Watchers (1 En. 6–11). The short text introduces the four angels on the scene, their perception of the miserable state of humanity, and the reception of human complaint directed to God. The positive presentation of the four an-gels can be contrasted by the negative presentation of the fallen Watchers in 1 En. 6:2-3.7-8. On the other hand, 1 En. 9:1-3 is related to 1 En. 10:1-16 where the same four angels re-ceive from God the divine commissioning. Since it introduces the decisive turn in the myth narrative thread, 1 En. 9:1-3 divides the myth into two parts, which implies the symmetric disposition of the myth.
Contributors
author
References
  • Abegg, M.G., The Dead Sea Scrolls Concordance. Vol. 1: The Non-Biblical Texts from Qumran(Leiden: Brill 2003) II.
  • Argall, R.A., 1 Enoch and Sirach. A Comparative Literary and Conceptual Analysis of the Themes of Revelation, Creation and Judgment (Society of Biblical Literature. Early Judaism and Its Literature 8; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press 1995).
  • Balz, H. – Schneider, G., Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerd-mans 1990) I.
  • Black, M., Apocalypsis Henochi Graece (Pseudepigrapha Veteris Testamenti Graece 3; Leiden: Brill 1970).
  • Black, M., The Book of Enoch or I Enoch.A New English Edition with Commentary and Textual Notes(Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha 7; Leiden: Brill 1985).
  • Brown, F. – Driver, S. – Briggs, C., The Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon: With an Appendix Containing the Biblical Aramaic (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1907).
  • Charles, R.H., The Book of Enoch or 1 Enoch. Translated from the Editor’s Ethiopic Text (Oxford, MS: Oxford University Press 1912; repr. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock 2011).
  • Charles, R.H.,The Ethiopic Version of the Book of Enoch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906; repr. Colling-wood, Vic.: Trieste 2017).
  • Cook, E.M., Dictionary of Qumran Aramaic (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns 2015).
  • Czerski, J., Metodologia Nowego Testamentu (Opolska Biblioteka Teologiczna 26; Opole: RW UO 2012).
  • Danker, F.W., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press 2000).
  • Davidson, M.J., Angels at Qumran. A Comparative Study of 1 Enoch 1-36, 72-108 and Sectarian Writings from Qumran (Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha. Supplement Series 11; Sheffield: A&C Black 1992).
  • Denis, A.M., Concordance grecque des Pseudépigraphes d’Ancien Testament (Louvain: Peeters 1987).
  • Drawnel, H., ,,1 Enoch 6–11 Interpreted in the Light of Mesopotamian Incantation Literature”, Enoch and the Synoptic Gospels. Reminiscences, Allusions, Intertextuality (e d . L .T. St ucke n-bruck – G. Boccaccini) (Society of Biblical Literature Early Judaism and Its Literature 44; Atlanta, GA: SBL Press 2016) 245-284.
  • Drawnel, H., Qumran Cave 4: The Aramaic Books of Enoch (Oxford: Oxford University Press [w druku]).
  • Drawnel, H., ,,The Mesopotamian Background of the Enochic Giants and Evil Spirits”, Dead Sea Discov-eries 21 (2014) 14-38.
  • Drawnel, H.,,,Ukaranie Asaela (1 Hen. 10,4-8) w kontekście mezopotamskiej literatury zwalczającej czarną magię”, Biblical Annals 3 (2013) 285-307.
  • Drawnel, H., ,,Zawodowa wiedza Asaela (1 Hen. 8,1) i jej relacja do starożytnej Mezopotamii”, Biblical Annals 3 (2013) 47-66.
  • Hanson, P.D., ,,Rebellion in Heaven, Azazel, and Euhemeristic Heroes in 1 Enoch 6–11”, Journal of Biblical Literature 96 (1977) 195-233.
  • Iwański, D., ,,Mieszkanie Boga w niebie według Księgi Czuwających (1 Henoch 14,8-23)”, Collectanea Theologica 79/2 (2009) 101-112.
  • Iwański, D., Wstawiennictwo aniołów w Księdze Henocha (1Hen) (Scripta Theologica Thoruniensia 15; Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK 2011).
  • Joüon, P. – Muraoka, T., A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew (Subsidia Biblica 14; Roma: Editrice Pontificio Instituto Biblico 1991) II.
  • Jurewicz, O., Słownik grecko-polski (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SUB LUPA 2015).
  • Koehler, L. – Baumgartner, W., Wielki słownik hebrajsko-polski i aramejsko-polski Starego Testa-mentu (Warszawa: Vocatio 2013) I.
  • Kvanvig, H.S., ,,The Watcher Story and Genesis. Intertextual Reading”, Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 18/2 (2008) 163-183.
  • Milik, J.T, The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4 (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1976).
  • Molenberg, C., ,,A Study of the Roles of Shemihaza and Asael in I Enoch 6–11”, Journal of Jewish Studies 35 (1984) 136-146.
  • Mosshammer, A.A., Georgii Sincelli Ecloga Chronographica (Leipzig: Teubner Verlagsgesell-schaft 1984).
  • Muraoka, T., A Grammar of Qumran Aramaic (Ancient Near Eastern Studies 38; Leuven: Peeters 2011).
  • Muraoka, T.A., A Greek-English Lexiconof theSeptuagint (Louvain: Peeters 2009).
  • Muraoka, T.A., A Greek-Hebrew/Aramaic Two-way Index to the Septuagint (Louvain: Peeters 2010).
  • Myers, A.C., The Eerdmans Bible Dictionary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1987).
  • Newman, B.M., Greek-English Dictionary of the New Testament (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesel-lschaft 1993).
  • Newsom, C.A., “Gabriel (Angel)”, The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (ed. D.N. Freedman) (New York: Doubleday 1992) II, 893.
  • Newsom, C.A., “Uriel (Angel)”, The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (ed. D.N. Freedman) (New York: Dou-bleday 1992) VI, 769.
  • Nickelsburg, G.W.E., 1 Enoch 1. A Commentary of the Book of 1 Enoch, Chapters 1-36; 81-108(Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press 2001).
  • Nickelsburg, G.W., ,,Apocalyptic and Myth in 1 Enoch 6–11”, Journal of Biblical Literature 96/3 (1977) 383-405.
  • Rzepka, B., ,,Pytanie o właściwą metodologię analizy narracyjnej”, Biblica et Patristica Thoru-niensia 11/2 (2018) 147-158.
  • Schmidt, F.W, “Raphael (Angel)”, The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (ed. D.N. Freedman) (New York: Doubleday 1992) V, 621.
  • Sisson, J.P., ,,Intercession and the Denial of Peace in 1 Enoch 12-16”, Hebrew Annual Review 11 (1987) 371-386.
  • Stuckenbruck, L.T., ,,Theological Anthropology and the Enochic Book of Watchers (1 En. 6–11)”, Dust of the Ground and Breath of Life (Gen 2:7). The Problem of a Dualistic Anthropology in Early Judaism and Christianity (ed. J. van Ruiten – G. van Kooten) (Themes in Biblical Narra-tive 20; Leiden: Brill 2016) 16-35.
  • Szymik, S., Współczesne modele egzegezy biblijnej (Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL 2013).
  • Watson, D.F., “Michael (Angel)”, The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (ed. D.N. Freedman) (New York: Doubleday 1992) IV, 811.
  • Węgrzyn, A., Postawy wobec Jezusa ofiarującego miłość. Analiza narracyjna (Łk 7,36-50) (Studia Biblica Lublinensia 16; Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL 2016).
  • Witczyk, H., ,,Wielowymiarowa re-kreacja postaci literackich”, Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia 11/2 (2018) 177-195.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-2ec3c2cb-ec61-4c04-a4cc-6f7f35075548
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.