PL EN


2011 | 53 | 2 | 7–23
Article title

Development Of Aspect And Tense In Semitic

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
A survey of pertinent literature reveals that many studies of aspect in Semitic languages do not pay a due attention to the crucial theoretical distinction of perfect and perfectivity. In this paper I will adopt the ‘chronogenetic’ model of the morphosyntactic development of tense and aspect tested for the Indoeuropean languages (Hewson & Bubenik 1997) that allows five major aspectual categories to be distinguished (prospective, inceptive, imperfective, perfective, perfect) within ‘event time’. I will argue that the appearance in arabic of the analytic double-finite perfect (of the type kun-tu katab-tu ‘I had written’) was the most significant innovation during the new Stage not to be found in the other Central Semitic languages. During the Middle Stage in Mishnaic  hebrew and Middle aramaic the canonical progressive aspect was paradigmatized while Classical arabic created its double-finite counterpart (kān-a ya-ktub-u ‘he was writing’). the significance of this approach to the study of the universals of tense and aspect will be evaluated.
Keywords
EN
aspect   tense   Semitic  
Contributors
author
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-2ef8275e-59cf-4de4-bf53-438788d94cb0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.