Soft power of language in social inclusion and exclusion and the unintended research outcomes

• Authors: Odrowaz-Coates Anna
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper refers to a small fraction of raw data obtained during 50 interviews carried out in Lisbon and in Warsaw in 2017-2018. Through the preliminary interpretative analysis with the use of MAXQDA 2018, a connection between English language and soft power (Nye 2004) was established. 'Soft power' is a political concept, re-introduced in this paper through the novel interpretation of the research data, whilst looking at the English language from a sociopolitical, critical pedagogy perspective, in order to investigate its implications for social inclusion and exclusion. Moreover, unexpected matrixes of language, gender and power were discovered, embodying Boudon's concept of unintended consequences of social action (1993). The study was conducted with the use of soft system methodology (SSM) and the notion of 'soft' in social sciences was explored. It also introduced SSM to the analysis of social aspects of the English language in public spaces in Poland and Portugal. Moreover, the results of the study confirmed that there is a connection between English language acquisition and the socio-economic positioning of workers in these locations. The study should be treated as singular and with no intention of building a universal theory, but aims to look into language from an original perspective and to share the most interesting quotes from the research participants, to reveal people's own voices and their own words (appropriately coded to maintain anonymity) and to establish direct contact between the interviewees and their audience.

Keywords

EN

language; soft power; gender; soft system methodology; social inclusion

• Publisher: Research Committee Language and Society
• Journal: Language, Discourse & Society
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 15-30

Dates

published

2018-12-30

Contributors

author

Odrowaz-Coates Anna

• The Maria Grzegorzewska University

References

• Archer, M. (2000). Being Human: the Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ball, S. J. (2005). Class strategies and the education market. The middle classes and social advantage. London: Routledge.
• Baydar, G. (2012). “Sexualised Productions of Space.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 19(6), 699–706.
• Becker, G. S. (1965). “A theory of the allocation of time.” The Economic Journal 75(299), 493-517.
• Becker, G. S. (1973). “A theory of marriage: Part I”. Journal of Political Economy 81(4), 813-846.
• Becker, G. S. (1975). “Human capital and the personal distribution of income: An analytical approach”. In: Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (2 ed.). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Becker, G. S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Bent-Goodley, T. (2009). “A black experience-based approach to gender-based violence”. Social Work 54(3), 262–269. doi: 10.1093/sw/54.3.262.
• Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogical discourse. London: Routledge.
• Blood, R., Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living. New York: Free Press.
• Boudon, R. (1982). The Unintended Consequences of Social Action. London: MacMillan.
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide of practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Checkland, P. B. (2011). “Soft Systems Methodology”. In: Thorpe R. & Holt R. (eds.) The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research. London: SAGE. Pp. 205-207.
• Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.
• Checkland, P., Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester, England: Wiley.
• Clegg, C. W., Walsh, S. (1998). “Soft systems analysis”. In: Symon G. & Cassell C. (eds.) Qualitative methods and the analysis in organizational research. London: Sage.
• Emerson, R. M. (1981). “Observational field work.” Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 351–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.07.080181.002031.
• European Commission. (2012). Special Eurobarometer 386, Europeans and their languages. http://ec.europa.eu/ public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf (27 February, 2017)
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
• Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalization. London: Routledge.
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
• Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power. New York: Routledge.
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Travistock publication.
• Foucault, M. (1982). “The subject and power. Afterward to Dreyfus and Rabinow.” In: Dreyfus H.L. and
• Rabinow P. (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester. Pp. 208-226.
• Foucault, M. (1982a). Space, knowledge and power: Interview, Skyline (March). https://monoskop.org/images/f/f6/Rabinow_Paul_ed_The_Foucault_Reader_1984.pdf (27 February, 2017)
• French, J., Raven, B. (1959). “The Basis of Power”. In: Cartwright D. (ed.) Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Goswami, S. (2017). “Violence against women in Indian Perspective: A sociological study”. In: Odrowaz- Coates, A. & Goswami S. (eds.) Symbolic violence in socio-educational contexts. A post-colonial critique. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej. Pp. 75-96.
• Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action: Reason and rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
• Harré, R. (2012). “Positioning theory: moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology”. In: Valsiner J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University. Pp. 191–206.
• Harré, R., van Langenhove L. (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Heidegger, M. (1959). Unterwegs zur Sprache. Pfullingen: Verlag Gunther Neske.
• Hochschild, A. (2016). Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.
• Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
• Hochschild, A. (2013). So How's the Family? and Other Essays. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Hooks, b. (1990). “Homeplace: A Site of Resistance.” In: hooks b. (ed.) Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. Boston, MA: South End. Pp 41–9.
• Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Victoria: Deacon University Press.
• Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. (1990). The action research reader (3rd ed.). Geelong, Victoria: Deacon University Press.
• Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner. London, England: Springer.
• Kleinman, A. (2000). “The Violence of Everyday Life: The multiple forms and dynamics of social violence”. In: Das V., (ed.) Violence and Subjectivity. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Pp. 226–241.
• Koshy, E., Koshy, V., & Waterman, H. (2011). Action research in healthcare. London: Sage.
• Modiano, M. (2009). Inclusive/Exclusive? English as a Lingua Franca in the European Union. World Englishes, 28(2), 208–223.
• Montesanti, S. R., Thurston, W. E. (2015). “Mapping the role of structural and interpersonal violence in the lives of women: implications for public health interventions and policy.” BMC Women’s Health, 15, 100. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0256-4.
• Mukherjee, K. (2017). “Governmentality and creation of the sexual subaltern: Exploring “queer” narratives from Kolkata”. In: Odrowaz-Coates, A., Goswami S. (eds.) Symbolic violence in socio-educational
• contexts. A post-colonial critique. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej. Pp. 76-111.
• Odrowaz-Coates, A. (2015). “A gated community as a 'soft' and gendered total institution”. International Sociology 30(3), 233-249. doi: 10.1177/0268580915578759.
• Odrowaz-Coates, A. (2018). "The neoliberal, global face of governmentality – The English speaking space of social exclusion/inclusion". Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica, 19(3): 91–110.
• Okin, S. (1989). Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.
• Rorty, R. (1991). Essays on Heidegger and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Seilhamer M.F. (2017). Message from the guest editor. Language, Discourse & Society 1(9), 5-8.
• Steinfort, P. (2014). “Soft Systems Methodology”. In: Coghlan D. & Brydon-Miller M. (eds.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research. London: Sage, Pp. 722-727.
• Talandis, G., Stout, M. (2015). “Towards new understandings: Reflections on an action research project with Japanese university students.” In: Borg S. & Sanchez H. (eds.) International perspectives on teacher research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 14–28.