PL EN


2016 | 40(1) | 81-97
Article title

Conceptual Blending Revisited: A Case of Paraphrased Literary Text in Contemporary Advertising

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
One of the successful tools used in creative contemporary advertising is the intentional modification of texts taken from popular literature (Gajewska 2011, also Bralczyk 2004). This paper offers a conceptual blending analysis of an advertisement for Ranigast®, a medicine used in the treatment of dyspepsia, which relies on a paraphrased fragment of The Sick Kitten, a famous Polish poem for children written by Stanisław Jachowicz. The linguistic analysis of the proposed advertisement will be carried out in the light of conceptual blending theory, in particular with the aid of Line Brandt and Per Aage Brandt’s model of conceptual integration (Brandt and Brandt 2005) Assuming that each advertisement is, to some extent, an interplay between the speaker and the hearer, a particular emphasis is going to be laid upon the complexity of the so-called Semiotic Base Space which serves as a “prerequisite for meaning construction” in the analyzed ad (Brandt and Brandt 2005: 225). For further elaboration of the Semiotic Base Space, which I consider of vital importance for an analyzed instance, Ronald Langacker’s notion of Current Discourse Space (Langacker 1999, 2001) as well as Esther Pascual’s notions of the Verbal Space and Here-and-Now Space (Pascual 2009) will also be taken into account.
Year
Issue
Pages
81-97
Physical description
Contributors
  • Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
References
  • Bache, C. (2005). Constraining Conceptual Integration Theory. Levels of blending and disintegration. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 1615-1635.
  • Bralczyk, J. (2004). Język na sprzedaż. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Brandt, L. (2013). The Communicative Mind: A Linguistic Exploration of Conceptual Integration and Meaning Construction. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Brandt, P. A. (2005). Mental Spaces and cognitive semantics: A critical comment. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 1578-1594.
  • Brandt, L., & P.A. Brandt (2005). Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3, 216–249.
  • Cienki, A. (2008). Looking at analysis of mental spaces and blending/ Looking at and experiencing discourse in interaction. In: T. Oakley and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 235-245.
  • Coulson, S., & T. Oakley (2000). Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3/4), 175-196.
  • Dancygier, B. (2008). The text and the story: Levels of blending in fictional narratives. In: T. Oakley and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 51-78.
  • Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fauconnier, G. (2012). Ten Lectures on Cognitive Construction of Meaning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • Fauconnier, G., & M. Turner (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science 22(2), 133-187.
  • Fauconnier, G., & M. Turner (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gajewska, E. (2011). Językowe gry nadawcy z odbiorcą we współczesnym dyskursie reklamy. Media i Społeczeństwo 1, 126-132.
  • Hart, C. (2007). Critical Discourse Analysis and conceptualization: Mental spaces, blended spaces and discourse spaces in the British National Party. In: C. Hart and D. Lukeš (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 107-131.
  • Hougaard, A., & T. Oakley (2008). Mental spaces and discourse analysis. In: T. Oakley and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1-26.
  • Kardela, H. (2007). ‘Good’ revisited: A mental space analysis. In: H. Kardela and A. Głaz (eds.), Further Insights into Semantics and Lexicography. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, 291-303.
  • Langacker, R. W. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Langacker, R. W. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2), 143-188.
  • Li, B., Zook, A., Davis, N., & M. O. Riedl (2012). Goal-driven conceptual blending: A computational approach for creativity. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Computational Creativity, Dublin, Ireland. 3-16. Available online: www.cc.gatech.edu/~riedl/pubs/iccc12.pdf.
  • Libura, A. (2010). Teoria przestrzeni mentalnych i integracji poje̜ciowej: struktura modelu i jego funkcjonalność. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
  • Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, Gesture and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mierzwińska-Hajnos, A., & R. Augustyn (2013). A note on the generic space: Do we really need it? Paper read at 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Oakley, T., & S. Coulson (2008). Mental spaces and metaphoric language in discourse. In: T. Oakley and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 27-50.
  • Pascual, E. (2009). “I was in that room!”: Conceptual integration of content and context in a writer’s vs. a prosecutor’s description of a murder. In: V. Evans and S. Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 499-516.
  • Skinner, E. (1990). Advertising fictions: Literature, advertisement, and social reading (review). MFS Modern Fiction Studies 36(2), 315-316.
  • Sperber, D., & D. Wilson (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Turner, M. (1996). The Literary Mind: the Origin of Thought and Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Veale, T., & D. O'Donoghue (2000). Computation and blending. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 253-281.
  • Wilson, D., & D. Sperber (2012). Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-2f3f99e4-5b65-412a-97bd-455b0e1c3092
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.