PL EN


2017 | 3(17) | 1 |
Article title

Governance and financing of innovative very small business (VSB): Evidence from a Canadian biotechnological firm

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
Abstracts
EN
Using a very small business (VSB) as a starting point the aim of the paper is to show the extent to which substantial and rapid technological, institutional and competitive changes can affect the emergence of new innovative ideas. Moreover, the paper attempts to identify a few general areas worth contemplating regarding the mechanisms of governance and the financing of young, innovative companies that stem from this research. In sectors that are subject to rapid competitive and technological changes, the structure of governance, the financing and the implementation are all key elements to their success. Results based on a case study show three distinct governance structures with related financing strategies. Hence, the personally crafted governance is reflecting by a personal or proximity (family, friends) type of financing, professional governance is accompanying by government financing (federal and provincial) and governance growth relies on institutional financing.
Year
Volume
Issue
1
Physical description
Dates
published
2017-03-30
Contributors
  • University of Moncton, Department of Administration, 18, Antonine-Maillet Street, Moncton (NB) E1A 3E9 Canada, alidou.ouedraogo@umoncton.ca
References
  • Alchian A.A. (1987). Property rights in: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Nowman (Eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Macmillan.
  • Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O. & Rizeanu, S. (2013). The governance role of multiple large shareholders: Evidence from the valuation of cash holdings. Journal of Management and Governance, Vol.17: 419–451.
  • Audretsch B.D. & Stephan P. (1996). Company-scientist Locational Linkages: The Case of Biotechnology. American Economic Review, Vol. 86: 641-652.
  • Boissin J.P. & Trommetter M. (2002). Stratégies de croissance et gouvernement des entreprises de biotechnologies. 11e Conférence de l'Association Internationale de Management Stratégique, Université Laval, Québec, 13-14-15 juin. Retrieved from http://www.strategie-aims.com/events/conferences/13-xeme-conference-de-l-aims/communications/2452-strategies-de-croissance-et-gouvernement-des-entreprises-de-biotechnologies/download
  • Burkert, M., Dávila, A., Mehta, K. & Oyon, D. (2014). Relating alternative forms of contingency fit to the appropriate methods to test them. Management Accounting Research, 25:6–29.
  • Burkert, M. & Lueg, R. (2013). Differences in the sophistication of value-based management – the role of top executives. Management Accounting Research, 24:3–22.
  • Catherine D. & Corolleur F. (2001). Nouvelles entreprises de biotechnologies et géographie de l’innovation : Des fondateurs à leur business models, Revue d'Économie Régionale et Urbaine, n° 5, p. 785-808.
  • Casado, R.B., Burkert, M., Dàvila, A. & Oyon, D. (2016). Shareholder protection: The role of multiple Large shareholders. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(2): 105–129
  • Charreaux, G. (1997). Vers une théorie du gouvernement des entreprises, in G. Charreaux (Éd.), Le gouvernement des entreprises, Paris : Économica, p. 421-469.
  • Charreaux, G. (2002a). Le gouvernement des entreprises, in J. Allouche (ed.), Encyclopédie des ressources humaines, Paris : Économica.
  • Charreaux, G. (2002b). Variation sur le thème : "Á la recherche de nouvelles fondations pour la finance et la gouvernance d'entreprise. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, vol. 5, n° 3, septembre, p.5-68.
  • Charreaux, G.& Desbrières P. (1997). Le point sur le gouvernement des entreprises, Banque & Marchés, juillet-août, n° 29, p. 28-34.
  • Charreaux, G. & Desbrières P. (1998). Gouvernance des entreprises : valeur partenariale contrevaleur actionnariale, Finance Contrôle Stratégie, vol. 1, n° 2, juin, p. 57-88.
  • Dasgupta, A. & Piacentino, G. (2015). The Wall Street walk when blockholders compete for flows, The Journal of Finance. DOI:10.1111/jofi.12308.
  • Deo, S. (2013). The impact of globalization on small business enterprises, 26th Annual SEAANZ Conference proceedings, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.seaanz.org/sites/seaanz/documents/2013SEAANZConference/SEAANZ-2013-Deo.pdf
  • Depret, M.-H. (2002). Coalitions et réseaux de firmes : Les nouvelles stratégies concurrentielles dans la globalisation, Gestion 2000, n° 1, janvier-février, p. 35-53.
  • Depret, M.H. & Hamdouch, A. (2001). Les sociétés de biotech à l'épreuve du dilemme financement-crédibilité, Biotechnologies & Finances, n° 74, juillet, p. 4-5. Retrieved from http://www.eei-biotechfinances.com
  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectory: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technological Change. Research Policy, vol. 11, n° 3, p. 147-162.
  • Edmans, A. (2014). Blockholders and corporate governance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 6:23–50.
  • Edmans, A., Fang, V. W. & Zur, E. (2013). The effect of liquidity on governance. Review of Financial Studies, 26: 1443–1482.
  • Edmans, A., Levit, D. & Reilly, D. (2014). Governance and comovement under common ownership. Working paper, Institute of Finance and Accounting, London Business School. Retrieved from https://jacobslevycenter.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Edmans-Levit-Governance-and-Comovement-Under-Common-Ownership.pdf
  • Fama, E.F. & Jensen M.C. (1983a). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 26, June, p. 301-326.
  • Fama, E.F. & Jensen M.C. (1983b). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 26, June, p. 327-350.
  • Funchal, B. & Monte-Mor, D.S. (2016). Corporate Governance and Credit Access in Brazil: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act as a Natural Experiment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(5): 528–547
  • Gaffard, J.L. (1990). Innovations et changements structurels : Revue critique de l’analyse moderne de l’innovation et des changements structurels. Revue d’Économie Politique, n° 3, p. 325-382.
  • Hamdouch, A. (2002). Complémentarités inter-firmes, préemption de partenaires et rendements croissants de coalition : une formalisation des logiques de rapprochement entre firmes face aux nouvelles technologies et à la globalisation. Revue Région et Développement, n° 16, 2e semestre, p. 161-189.
  • Hamdouch, A. & Depret, M.H. (2001). La nouvelle économie industrielle de la pharmacie. Paris : Elsevier/Lavoisier
  • Hamdouch, A. & Holley C. (2015). Crafting Collaborative Governance: Water Resources, California's Delta Plan, and Audited Self-Management in New Zealand. Environmental Law Reporter, Vol.45, n° 4.
  • Jaffe, A. (2000). The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process, Research Policy, vol. 29, p. 531-557.
  • Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H., (1976). Theory of the Fir: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, n° 4, p. 305-360.
  • Julien, P.A. (2001). Les PME à forte croissance et la métaphore du jazz. Revue Internationale PME, vol. 14, n° 3-4, p. 129-161.
  • Julien, P.A.& Marchesnay, M. (2001). La petite entreprise, Paris : Vuibert.
  • Kumar, P. & Zattoni, A. (2013a). Ownership, managerial entrenchment, and corporate performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21:1–3.
  • Kumar, P. & Zattoni, A. (2014). Corporate governance, board of directors, and the firm: A maturing field, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22:365–6.
  • Luo, Y. & Salterio, S. E. (2014). Governance quality in a “comply or explain” governance disclosure regime. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22: 460–481.
  • Mangematin, V. (2003). PME de biotechnologie : Plusieurs business models en concurrence in P. Mustar P. et H. Penan (Eds.), Encyclopédie de l’innovation, Paris : Économica.
  • Mowery, D.C., Nelson R., Sampart B., & Ziedonis A. (2001). The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy, vol. 30, n° 1, p. 99-119.
  • Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems management, Vol. 21, Issue 4
  • Yamahaki, C. & Frynas J.G. (2016). Institutional Determinants of Private Shareholder Engagement IN Brazil and South Africa: The role of Regulation. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(5): 509-527
  • Zucker, L. & Brewer, M. (1996). Social Networks, Learning and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms. Organizational Science, vol. 7, n° 4, p. 428-443.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-2f5d7bfd-6993-40d1-98ab-d8d863b5c0d1
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.