2017 | 17 | 3 | 53-76
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
This study investigated foreign language students’ perceptions about their Information and Communication Technology (ICT)-based College English Course (CEC) in China. The research used a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire based on Simsek (2008). A factor analysis confirmed the construct validity of the questionnaire and 6 factors were delineated. 200 non-English majors who responded mentioned that ICT was well integrated into the CEC. They reported that the ICT-based CEC gave them a good environment for independent learning and they were more motivated to learn English as they had more opportunities to communicate, interact and cooperate with other students in English using authentic language in a variety of contexts. They found learning was more effective compared to the traditional learning environment; it provided freer learning environment, less restricted communication, more time flexibility and more self-scheduled study plan ensuring learner-centeredness and learning autonomy.
Physical description
  • Ablard, K.E., & Lipschultz, R.E. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology. 90(1), 94-101.
  • Altun, A. (2005). Towards an effective integration of technology: Message boards for strengthening communication. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology -TOJET. 4(1), 68-74.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Cagiltay, N.E., Yildirim, S., & Aksu, M. (2006). Students' preferences on Web-based instruction: Linear or non-linear. Educational Technology & Society. 9(3), 122-136.
  • Chen, C. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Educational Research. 102, 65-75.
  • Chien, I. C., & Liou, H. C. (2002). A study of an on-line multi-user English learning environment for senior high school students. Proceedings of Taiwan Area Network Conference. pp. 359-362.
  • Deen, J. Y. (1987). An Analysis of Classroom Interaction in a Cooperative Learning and Teacher-centered Setting. Unpublished master's thesis. Los Angeles: University of California.
  • Dong, Y. (2005). A Study of Teacher and Learner Attitude to CALL. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology.
  • Gay, L. R., & Diehl, P. L. (1992). Research Methods for Business and Management. New York: Macmillan.
  • Glover, J., Ronning, R., & Bruning, R. (1990). Cognitive Psychology for Teachers. New York: Macmillan.
  • Guo, A. (2014). A student profile model based online English learning. Computer Modelling and New Technologies. 18(11), 921-926.
  • Hu, Z., & McGrath, I. (2011). Innovation in higher education in China: Are teachers ready to integrate ICT in English language teaching? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 41–59. Retrieved June 2017, from
  • Hu, Z., & McGrath, I. (2012). Integrating ICT into College English: An implementation study of a national reform. Education and Information Technologies, 17, 147–165, Retrieved June 2017,
  • Iyengar, R., & Byker, E. (2014). Comparative perspectives on teacher education in South Asia. Annual Review of Comparative and International Education, 25, 99-106. Retrieved June 2017
  • Killen, R. (2009). Effective Teaching Strategies. Lessons from Research and Practice (5th ed.). Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.
  • Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2005). Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 14(3), 281-307. Retrieved June 2017, from
  • Lim, C. P., Yan, H., & Xiong, X (2015). Development of preservice teachers’ information and communication technology (ICT) in education competencies in a mainland Chinese university. Educational Media International, 52(1), 15-32, Retrieved June 2017, from
  • Liou, H. C. (2000). Conceptualization and implementation of an English learning Web site which bridges TEFL theories and practices. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multimedia Language Education.
  • Ohta, A. S. (1996). The development of pragmatic competence in learner-learner interaction. The Annual Meeting of the International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning. Retrieved June 2017, from
  • Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. London: Longmans.
  • Rabah, J. (2015). Benefits and challenges of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) integration in Québec English shools. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 24-31.
  • Seliger, H. W. (1977). A study of interaction patterns and L2 competence. Language Learning, 27(2), 263-278.
  • Shen, H., Yuan, R., & Ewing, R. (2014). English learning websites and digital resources from the perspective of Chinese university EFL practitioners. ReCALL, 27(2), 156-176. Retrieved June 2017,
  • Simsek, S. (2008). Students’ attitudes towards integration of ICTs in a reading course: A case in Turkey. Computers & Education. 51(1), 200-211.
  • Soler, E. A. (2002). Relationship between teacher-led versus learners’ interaction and the development of pragmatics in the EFL classroom. International Journal of Educational Research. 37(3), 359-377.
  • Srijittra, N. (2010). Computer Assisted Language Learning to Improve English for Hotel at a University in the North-Eastern Region of Thailand. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Bangkok: Srinakhairinwirot University.
  • The Ministry of Education of China (2004). Teaching Requirements for College English curriculum (TRCEC), Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.s
  • Tinio, V. L. (2002). ICT in education: UN development programme. Retrieved March 2017, from
  • Towndrow, P. A., & Vallance, M. (2002). Using Information Technology in the Language Classroom (1st edition). Singapore: Pearson.
  • Tri, D. H., & Nguyen, N. H. T. (2017). An exploratory study of ICT use in English language learning among EFL university students. Teaching English with Technology, 14(4), 32-46. Retrieved June 2017, from
  • Vijayalakshmi, K. (2017). ICT in teaching English Language in rural government schools. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 3(1), 57-63. Retrieved June 2017, from
  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer Assisted Language Learning: An introduction. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 3-20.
  • Warschauer, M. (2000). The changing global economy and the future of English teaching. TESOL Quarterly. 34(3), 511-535.
  • Williams, J. (2003). Computers and project-based learning. Media and Methods, 40(2), 18-20.
  • Yang, S.C. (2001). Integrating computer-mediated tools into the language curriculum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 85-93.
  • Young, S. S. C. (2003). Integrating ICT into second language education in a vocational high school. National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 447-461.
  • Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal. 21(1), 7-27.
  • Zhang, P., & Li, N. (2003). An assessment of research in MIS oriented HCI studies. American Psychological Association, Symposium of Divisions 21 and 14: The Many Faces of HCI Researchers in IS, Toronto, Canada, August.
  • Zhong, K. W. (2005). Integration of CALL into College English Reading Instruction: A New Model and an Empirical Study. Changsa, China: National University of Defence Technology.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.