2014 | 3 | 89-107
Article title

Metaphorical Underpinnings of Panels in Comics

Title variants
Languages of publication
In the field of comics studies, which evolved from a mere topic area into a burgeoning field of inquiry at the turn of 1980s and 1990s, the dialogue about meaning in comics was initiated by practicing cartoonists, who proposed new lines of research and introduced serviceable terminology which remains in use even today. These early contributions may have provided a solid basis for the investigation of meaning in comics, but they were repeatedly criticized for their lack of an academic orientation prerequisite for serious-minded comics scholarship. With the onset of the new millennium, it was linguistic theory that came to be called upon with increasing frequency to provide the missing orientation. Recent observers point out that for over a decade linguistics in general, and cognitive linguistics in particular, has informed much of the most insightful comics research. This paper is an attempt to contribute to the intersection of cognitive linguistics and comics scholarship by demonstrating that a number of conceptual metaphors whose linguistic manifestations have been studied in considerable detail facilitate, either separately or jointly, the conceptualization of the main formal unit of comics: the so-called panel. It appears that depending on what individual panels are taken to refer to (events, states, periods of time, visual fields, portions of the world of the story), they are metaphorized in different ways (as objects, containers, windows onto the world of the story), in accordance with a central tenet of conceptual metaphor theory whereby metaphors highlight some aspects of the metaphorized concept and simultaneously hide others. On the one hand, this paper adds to the growing body of research demonstrating that metaphor is a conceptual mechanism which transcends language; on the other, it adds to the dialogue about how comics achieve meaning by discussing the metaphorical underpinnings of the panel, and by framing this discussion in terms of cognitive linguistics, a scholarly tradition with which comics studies have successfully intersected.
  • University of Wrocław
  • Philological School of Higher Education in Wrocław
  • Abbott, Michael, Charles Forceville (2011) “Visual Representations of Emotion in Manga: loss of control is loss of hands in Azumanga Daioh Volume 4.” [In:] Language and Literature 20 (2); 1–22.
  • Badman, Derik A. (2010) “Talking, Thinking, and Seeing in Pictures: Narration, Focalization, and Ocularization in Comics Narratives.” [In:] International Journal of Comic Art 12 (2‒3); 91–111.
  • Beaver, Frank E. ([2006] 2009) Dictionary of Film Terms: The Aesthetic Companion to Film Art. 4th ed. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Carrier, David (2000) The Aesthetics of Comics. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Cohn, Neil (2010) “Extra! Extra! Semantics in Comics!: The Conceptual Structure of Chicago Tribune Advertisements.” [In:] Journal of Pragmatics 42; 3138–3146.
  • Cohn, Neil (2012) “Comics, Linguistics, and Visual Language: The Past and Future of a Field.” [In:] Frank Bramlett (ed.) Linguistics and the Study of Comics. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 92–118.
  • Duncan, Randy, Matthew J. Smith (2009) The Power of Comics: History, Form & Culture. New York: Continuum.
  • Eerden, Bart (2009) “Anger in Asterix: The Metaphorical Representation of Anger in Comics and Animated Films.” [In:] Charles Forceville, Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 243–264 (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics. Vol. 11).
  • Eisner, Will ([1985] 2008): Comics and Sequential Art. Reprint. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
  • Evans, Vyvyan, Melanie Green (2006) Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Forceville, Charles (2005) “Visual Representations of the Idealized Cognitive Model of Anger in the Asterix Album La Zizanie.” [In:] Journal of Pragmatics 37; 69–88.
  • Forceville, Charles (2009) “Non-Verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitivist Framework: Agendas for Research.” [In:] Charles Forceville, Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 19–42 (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics. Vol. 11).
  • Forceville, Charles (2011) “Pictorial Runes in Tintin and the Picaros.” [In:] Journal of Pragmatics 43; 875–890.
  • Forceville, Charles, Tony Veale, Kurt Feyaerts (2010) “Balloonics: The Visuals of Balloons in Comics.” [In:] Joyce Goggin, Dan Hassler-Forest (eds.) The Rise and Reason of Comics and Graphic Literature: Critical Essays on the Form. Jefferson: McFarland; 56–73.
  • Freeman, Margaret H. (2000) “Poetry and the Scope of Metaphor: Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literature.” [In:] Antonio Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 253–281 (Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Vol. 30).
  • Groensteen, Thierry ([1999] 2007) The System of Comics. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
  • Harvey, Robert C. (1994) The Art of the Funnies: An Aesthetic History. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
  • Harvey, Robert C. (1996) The Art of the Comic Book: An Aesthetic History. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
  • Heer, Jeet, Kent Worcester (2009) “Introduction.” [In:] Jeet Heer, Kent Worcester (eds.) A Comics Studies Reader. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi; xi–xv.
  • Herman, David (2004) “Toward a Transmedial Narratology.” [In:] Marie-Laure Ryan (ed.) Narrative across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 47–75.
  • Inge, M. Thomas (1990) Comics as Culture. Jackson, London: University Press of Mississippi.
  • Johansen, Jørgen D., Svend E. Larsen ([1994] 2002) Signs in Use: An Introduction to Semiotics. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Johnson, Mark (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Kunzle, David (1973) The Early Comic Strip: Narrative Strips and Picture Stories in the European Broadsheet from c.1450 to 1825. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Lakoff, George (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson ([1980] 2003) Metaphors We Live By. 2nd ed. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. (1987a) “Nouns and Verbs.” [In:] Language 63; 53‒94.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. (1987b) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. (2012) “Linguistic Manifestations of the Space-Time (Dis)analogy.” [In:] Luna Filipović, Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.) Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, Culture, and Cognition. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 191‒215 (Human Cognitive Processing. Vol. 37).
  • Lefèvre, Pascal (2000) “The Importance of Being ‘Published’: A Comparative Study of Different Comics Formats.” [In:] Anne Magnussen, Hans-Christian Christiansen (eds.) Comics and Culture: Analytical and Theoretical Approaches to Comics. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press; 91–106.
  • McCloud, Scott ([1993] 1994) Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. Reprint. New York: HarperPerennial.
  • Miller, Ann (2007) Reading bande dessinée: Critical Approaches to French-Language Comic Strip. Bristol, Chicago: Intellect Books.
  • Miodrag, Hannah (2013) Comics and Language: Reimagining Critical Discourse on the Form. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
  • Nöth, Winfried ([1990] 1995): Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Panther, Klaus-Uwe, Linda L. Thornburg (2009) “Introduction: On Figuration in Grammar.” [In:] Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg, Antonio Barcelona (eds.) Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar.Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 1–44 (Human Cognitive Processing. Vol. 25).
  • Peirce, Charles S. (1931–1958) Collected Papers. Vol. 1–6 ed. by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss; vol. 7–8 ed. by Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Potsch, Elizabeth, Robert F. Williams (2012) “Image Schemas and Conceptual Metaphor in Action Comics.” [In:] Frank Bramlett (ed.) Linguistics and the Study of Comics. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 13–36.
  • Radden, Günter, René Dirven (2007) Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins (Cognitive Linguistics in Practice. Vol. 2).
  • Reddy, Michael ([1979] 1993) “The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language.” [In:] Andrew Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 164–201.
  • Ryan, Marie-Laure (2004) “Introduction.” [In:] Marie-Laure Ryan (ed.) Narrative across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1–40.
  • Sabin, Roger (1993) Adult Comics: An Introduction. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Saraceni, Mario (2003) The Language of Comics. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Shinohara, Kazuko, Yoshihiro Matsunaka (2009) “Pictorial Metaphors of Emotion in Japanese Comics.” [In:] Charles Forceville, Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 265–293 (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics. Vol. 11).
  • Siraganian, Lisa (2012) Modernism’s Other Work: The Art Object’s Political Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Szawerna, Michał (2012) “Toward a Cognitive Linguistic Approach to Analyzing Comics: The Contrasting Construals of Comics in Similarity-Based Views of Conceptual Representation.” [In:] Zdzisław Wąsik,
  • Piotr Czajka, Michał Szawerna (eds.) Alternate Construals in Linguistics. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Filologicznej we Wrocławiu; 59–74 (Philologica Wratislaviensia: Acta et Studia. Vol. 8).
  • Szawerna, Michał (2013a) “On Developing a Cognitive Account of Comics.” [In:] Marek Kuczyński, Leszek Szymański (eds.) Language, Thought, and Education: Across Systems. Zielona Góra: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego; 131–147.
  • Szawerna, Michał (2013b) “A Peircean Characterization of the Semiotic Properties of Selected Visual Signs Found in Comics.” [In:] Ars Aeterna 5 (1); 51–72.
  • Tyler, Andrea, Vyvyan Evans (2003) The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, Bob (2000) “Soukuss or Sell-out?: Congolese Popular Dance Music as Cultural Commodity.” [In:] Angelique Haugerud, Margaret P. Stone, Peter D. Little (eds.) Commodities and Globalization: Anthropological Perspectives. Oxford, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 33–58.
  • Yu, Ning (1998) The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins (Human Cognitive Processing. Vol. 1).
  • Casati, Roberto, Achille Varzi (2006) “Events.” [In:] Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition). Available at: [ED September 2013].
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.