Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2013 | nr 22 | 67-83

Article title

Minimalizacja cierpienia zwierząt a wegetarianizm

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
Minimisation of animal suffering and vegetarianism

Languages of publication

PL EN

Abstracts

EN
The article is a reductio ad absurdum of assumptions which are shared by a largenumber of followers of the animal welfare movement and utilitarianism. I arguethat even if we accept the main ethical arguments for a negative moral assessmentof eating meat we should not promote vegetarianism but rather beefism (eating onlymeat from beef cattle). I also argue that some forms of vegetarianism, i.e. ichtivegetarianism,can be much more morally worse than normal meat diet. In order to justifythese thesis I show that there are significant moral differences in the consumptionof animal products from different species.

Contributors

krzysztofsaja@gmail.com Minimalizacja cierpienia zwierząt a wegetarianizm [Minimisation of animal suffering and vegetarianism] Subjects: Philosophy (General), Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, Philosophy, Philosophy and Religion, Philosophy (General), Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, Philosophy, Philosophy and Religion Journal Country: Poland Authors: Krzysztof Saja Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego Date of publication: 2013 June Published in: Analiza i Egzystencja , Vol 22, Pp 67-83 (2013) ISSN(s): 1734-9923 Keywords: welfarism, animal suffering, veganism, beefism, vegetarianism, Peter Singer, environmental ethics, utilitarianism Date added to DOAJ: 2013-10-12 Full text: http://usfiles.us.szc.pl/pliki/plik_1381188697.pdf Journal Language(s): Polish, German Journal License: CC by Country of publication: Poland Abstract: (collapse) The article is a reductio ad absurdum of assumptions which are shared by a largenumber of followers of the animal welfare movement and utilitarianism. I arguethat even if we accept the main ethical arguments for a negative moral assessmentof eating meat we should not promote vegetarianism but rather beefism (eating onlymeat from beef cattle). I also argue that some forms of vegetarianism, i.e. ichtivegetarianism,can be much more morally worse than normal meat diet. In order to justifythese thesis I show that there are significant moral differences in the consumptionof animal products from different species. Bookmark and Share

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-31301ae1-db3b-4448-870d-9486173ae0ff
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.