PL EN


2015 | 4/2015 (56) | 177-194
Article title

How New Is Crowdfunding? The Venture Capital Evolution without Revolution – Discourse on Risk Capital Themes and their Relevance to Poland

Content
Title variants
PL
Jak nowe jest zjawisko finansowana społecznościowego? Ewolucja kapitału wysokiego ryzyka bez rewolucji – rozważania o zagadnieniach kapitału podwyższonego ryzyka i ich znaczeniu dla Polski
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This conceptual paper discourses the emergence and development of crowdfunding as a step of the broader risk capital evolution. In doing so, we call for a more careful discussion about whether crowdfunding is the next big thing in risk capital mechanisms or a continuity of risk capital instruments, which matches technological regime changes and aligns to economic and social development. Based on a historical overview of types of funding, we elaborate that the risk capital market follows an evolutionary rather than revolutionary progression, where crowdfunding developed as a continuity of business angel, venture capital and microfinance mechanisms. This paper also provides policy implications by discoursing the risk capital evolution and highlights the importance of diversification in risk capital institutions to drive entrepreneurial activity.
PL
W artykule omówiono powstanie i rozwój zjawiska finansowania społecznościowego jako etapu szerszej pojętej ewolucji kapitału podwyższonego ryzyka. Rozważając tę problematykę, autorzy postulują dokładniejsze przedyskutowanie kwestii, czy finansowanie to jest kolejnym kamieniem milowym w rozwoju mechanizmów kapitału podwyższonego ryzyka czy też stanowi kontynuację tego rodzaju instrumentów, która jest zgodna ze zmianami w reżimie technologicznym i zbieżna z rozwojem społecznogospodarczym. Na podstawie historycznego przeglądu rodzajów finansowania stwierdzono, że rynek kapitału podwyższonego ryzyka ulega zmianom ewolucyjnym, a nie rewolucyjnym, a finansowanie społecznościowe było kontynuacją takich mechanizmów jak aniołowie biznesu, kapitał wysokiego ryzyka i mikrofinanse. W artykule przedstawiono także konsekwencje dla polityki oraz wskazano znaczenie dywersyfikacji instytucji dostarczających taki kapitał w stymulowaniu przedsiębiorczości.
Contributors
author
References
  • Afuah, A. & Tucci, C.L. (2012). Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search. Academy of Management Review, 37 (3), 355–375.
  • Aydin, D.G. & Takay, B.A. (2012). Schumpeterian Business Cycles: Innovations, Bubbles and Global Crises. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (7), 123–128.
  • Baeck, P., Collins, L. & Zhang, B. (2014). Understanding Alternative Finance. The UK Alternative Finance Industry Report 2014. Nesta [Online]. Available at: https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/understanding-alternative-finance-2014.pdf (Accessed: 5 June 2015).
  • Barnes, T. & Gertler, M. (1999). The New Industrial Geography: Regions, Regulations and Institutions. London: Routledge.
  • Bell, C.G. & McNamara, J.E. (1991). High-Tech Ventures: The Guide for Entrepreneurial Success. New York: Perseus Books Publishing.
  • Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (5), 585–609.
  • Bester, H. (1994). The Role of Collateral in a Model of Debt Renegotiation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 26 (1), 72–86.
  • Boyler, R. & Saillard, Y. (2001). Régulation Theory: The State of the Art. Paris: Routledge. Brabham, D.C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a Model for problem Solving: An Introduction and Cases. Covergence, 14 (1), 75–90.
  • Bruton, G., Khavul, S., Siegel, D. &Wright, M. (2014). New Financial Alternatives in Seeding Entrepreneurship: Microfinance, Crowdfunding, and Peer-to Peer Innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39 (1), 9–26.
  • Bygrave, W.D. & Timmons, J.A. (1992). Venture Capital at the Crosscroads. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Carlsson, B. & Stankiewicz, R. (1995). On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems. In B. Carlsson (ed.), Technological systems and economic performance: the case of factory automation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Castells, M. (1994). Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. London: Routledge.
  • Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Chircu, A.M. & Kauffman, R.J. (2000). Limits to Value in Electronic Commerce-Related IT Investments. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17 (2), 59–80.
  • Colombo, M.G. & Grilli, L. (2006). Funding Gaps? Access To Bank Loans By High-Tech Start-Ups. Small Business Economics, 29 (1–2), 25–46.
  • Cooke, P., Uranga, M.G. & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26 (4–5), 475–491.
  • CSES (2012). Evaluation of EU Member States’ Business Angel Markets and Policies– Final Report [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/dg/files/ba-rep_en.pdf (Accessed: 18 April 2015)
  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11 (3), 147–162.
  • Eckhardt, J.T., Shane, S. & Delmar, F. (2006). Multistage selection and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 52 (2), 220–232.
  • Espring-Andersen, G. (1996). Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage.
  • Eurobarometer (2012). Entrepreneurship in the EU and Beyond. Flash Eurobarometer 354 [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_354_en.pdf (Accessed: 12 April 2015)
  • Europa (2015). “Summaries of EU legislation – Glossary.” [Online]. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/glossary/structural_cohesion_fund_en.htm
  • European Commission (1998). Fostering Entrepreneurship in Europe: Priorities for the Future [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/support_measures/docs/fostering-98_en.pdf (Accessed: 12 April 2015)
  • European Commission (2013a). Crowdfunding in the EU – Exploring the added value of potential EU action. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/crowdfunding/docs/consultation-document_en.pdf (Accessed 14 October 2014).
  • European Commission (2013b). Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan: Reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe [Online]. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0795:FIN:EN:PDF (Accessed: 14 October 2014).
  • European Commission (2014). Research and Innovation Performance in the EU: Innovation Union progress at country level [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/state-of-the-union/2014/iuc_progress_report_2014.pdf (Accessed: 27 August 2015).
  • EVCA (2013). Central and Eastern Europe Statistics 2013. European Private Equity & Venture Capital Association [Online]. Available at: http://www.evca.eu/media/259990/_evca_bro_sp_cee2013.pdf (Accessed: 20 November 2014).
  • Freeman, C. & Perez, C. (1988). Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour. In G.Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Soete (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, 38–66. London: Fancis Pinter.
  • Freeman, C. & Soete, L. (1987). Technical Change and Full Employment. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Freeman, C., Clark, J. & Soete, L. (1982). Unemployment and Technical Innovation: A Study of Long Waves and Economic Development. London: Continuum International Publishing.
  • Frydrych, D. Bock, A.J. Kinder T. & Koeck, B. (2014). Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 16 (3), 247–269.
  • Frydrych, D., Bock, A.J. & Kinder, T. (2015). Creating Project Legitimacy – The Role of Entrepreneurial Narrative in Reward-Based Crowdfunding. In J. Brabet, I. Maque & J. Méric (eds.), The International Research Handbook of Crowdfunding. London: Emerald.
  • Gartner (2008). Gartner Says Social Banking Platforms Threaten Traditional Banks for Control of Financial Relationships. Gartner Newsroom [Online]. Available at: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/597907 (Accessed: 20 February 2014).
  • Geels, F.W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33 (6–7), 897–920.
  • GEM (2013). GEM Poland 2013 [Online]. Available at: http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49065 (Accessed: 29 August 2015).
  • Glaeser, E.L., Kerr, W.R. & Ponzetto, G.A.M. (2010). Clusters of entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67 (1), 150–168.
  • Gompers, P.A. & Lerner, J. (2001). The Venture Capital Revolution. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2), 145–168.
  • Gregson, G. (2014). Financing New Ventures: An Entrepreneur’s Guide to Business Angel Investment. New York: Business Expert Press.
  • Harrison, R.T. (2013). Crowdfunding and the Revitalisation of the Early Stage Risk Capital Market: Catalyst or Chimera? Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 15 (4), 283–287.
  • Harrison, R.T., Don, G., Johnston, K.G. & Greig, M. (2010). The early-stage risk capital market in Scotland since 2000: issues of scale, characteristics and market efficiency. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 12 (3), 211–239.
  • Hollis, A. & Sweetman, A. (1997). Complementarity, Competition and Institutional Development: The Irish Loan Funds Through Three Centuries. University of Calgary Department of Economics Discussion Paper 97-06 [Online]. Available at: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/eh/papers/9704/9704003.pdf (Accessed: 27 September 2014).
  • Hollis, A., & Sweetman, A. (2001). The life-cycle of a microfinance institution: the Irish loan funds. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46 (3), 291–311.
  • Hulme, M.K. & Wright, C. (2006). Internet Based Social Lending: Past, Present and Future. London: Social Futures Observatory.
  • Huyghebaert, N. & Van de Gucht, L.M. (2007). The Determinants of Financial Structure: New Insights from Business Start-ups. European Financial Management, 13 (1), 101–133. Innovation Union Scoreboard (2015). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015 [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards/files/ius-2015_en.pdf (Accessed: 29 August 2015).
  • Ingram, C., Teigland, R. & Vaast, E. (2014). Solving the Puzzle of Crowdfunding: Where Technology Affordances and Institutional Entrepreneurship Collide. System Sciences (HICSS) [Online]. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6759162 (Accessed: 25 January 2015).
  • Johnson, D.R. (2008). Virtual Companies. [Online]. Available at: http://www.slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/2005 (Accessed: 8 December 2014)
  • Kickstarter (2015). Kickstarter [Online]. Available at: https://www.kickstarter.com/ (Accessed: 4 June 2015).
  • Kim, K. & Hann, I-H. (2013). Does Crowdfunding Democratize Access to Capital? A Geographical Analysis. INFORMS Conference on Information Systems and Technology [Online]. Available at: http://innovisops.com/papers/cist2013_submission_46.pdf (Accessed: 3 May 2014).
  • Kleemann, F., Voß, G.G. & Rieder, K. (2008). The Commercial Utilization of Consumer Work through Crowdsourcing. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 4 (1), 5–26.
  • Kondratieff, N.D. (1979). The Long Waves in Economic Life. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 2 (4), 519–562.
  • Koning, R. & Model, J. (2013). Social Influence Mechanisms in Crowdfunding Cascades: When Nothing is Better than Something. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Conference Paper [Online]. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2308161
  • (Accessed: 9 May 2014).
  • Król, K. (2015). Crowdfunding w Polsce [Online]. Available at: http://crowdfunding.pl/crowdfunding-w-polsce/ (Accessed: 26 May 2015)
  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Landström, H. & Mason, C. (2012). Handbook of Research on Venture Capital: Volume 2. A Globalizing Industry. Glos, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Lane, F.C. (1973). Venice, A Maritime Republic. London: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Lehner, O.M. (2013). Crowdfunding social ventures: a model and research agenda. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 15 (4), 289–311.
  • Luo, Y., Sun, J. & Lu Wang, S. (2011). Emerging Economy Copycats: Capability, Environment, and Strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25 (2), 37-56.
  • Macht, S.A. & Weatherston, S. (2014). The Benefits of Online Crowdfunding for Fund- Seeking Business Ventures. Strategic Change, 23 (1–2), 1–14.
  • MacLeod, G. (2001). New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25 (4), 804–829.
  • Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (1997). Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6 (1), 83–118.
  • Marom, D. (2013). Crowd-Empowered Microfinance. In J-P. Gueyie, R. Manos & J. Yaron (eds.), Microfinance in Developing Countries: Issues, Policies and Performance Evaluation, 127–151. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Mason, C.M., Harrison, R.T. & Botelho, T. (2015). Business Angel Exits: Strategies and Processes. In J.G. Hussain & J.M. Scott (eds.), International Research Handbook on Entrepreneurial Finance. London: Edward Elgar. [Online] Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2605912 (Accessed: 5 June 2015).
  • Massolution (2015). 2015CF –Crowdfunding Industry Report. Massolution [Online]. Available at: http://www.crowdsourcing.org/editorial/global-crowdfunding-market-toreach-344b-in-2015-predicts-massolutions-2015cf-industry-report/45376 (Accessed: 20 May 2015).
  • Mollick, E. (2014). The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Explorative Study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (1), 1–16.
  • Morduch, J. (1999). The Microfinance Promise. Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (4), 1569–1614.
  • Nelson, R.R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nelson, R.R. & Wintern, S.G. (1982). The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited. The American Economic Review, 72 (1), 114–132.
  • OECD (2014). Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2014. OECD Publishing [Online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/entrepreneur_aag-2014-en (Accessed: 6 June 2015).
  • Peneder, M. & Resch, A. (2015). Schumpeter and venture finance: radical theorist, broke investor, and enigmatic teacher. Industrial and Corporate Change, doi: 10.1093/icc/dtv004
  • Ramadani, V. (2009). Business angels: who they really are. Strategic Change, 18 (7–8), 249–258.
  • River Campus Libraries (2015). Collection Highlights: Pope. The Iliad of Homer [Online]. Available at: https://www.lib.rochester.edu/index.cfm?PAGE=3948(Accessed: 3 June 2015).
  • Roodman, D. (2012a). Due Diligence: An Impertinent Inquiry Into Microfinance. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Roodman, D. (2012b). The Lessons of Microfinance History. CGAP [Online]. Available at: http://www.cgap.org/blog/lessons-microfinance-history (Accessed: 26 October 2014).
  • Rosenberg, N. (1992). Science and technology in the twentieth century. In G. Dosi, R. Giannetti & P.A. Toninelli (eds.), Technology and Enterprise in Historical Perspective, 63–96. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Rossi, M. (2014). The New Ways to Raise Capital: An Exploratory Study of Crowdfunding. International Journal of Financial Research, 5 (2), 8–18.
  • Sahlman, W.A. (1990). The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (2), 473–521.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Sen, R. & King, R.C. (2003). Revisit the Debate on Intermediation, Disintermediation and Reintermediation due to E-commerce. Electronic Markets, 13 (2), 153–162.
  • Shenkar, O. (2010). Copycats: how smart companies use imitation to gain a strategic edge. Strategic Direction, 26 (10), 3–5.
  • Spigel, B. (2015). The Cultural Governance of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. In I. Bernhard (ed.), Geography of Growth: The Frequency, Nature and Consequences of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Regions of Varying Density: Uddevalla Symposium 2014, pp. 767–786.
  • Stamp, J.C. (1931). The Report of the Macmillan Committee. The Economic Journal, 41 (163), 424–435.
  • Stiglitz, J.E. (2000). The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (4), 1441–1478.
  • Stiglitz, J.E. & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. The American Economic Review, 71 (3), 393–410.
  • Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965). Social structure and organization. In J.G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, 142-193. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
  • Thatcher, O.J. (1907). The Library of Original Sources (Milwaukee: University Research Extension Co) [Online]. Available at: http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1497degama.asp (Accessed: 23 May 2015).
  • Tower-Pierce, J., Gillies, P. & Krolik, L. (2009). Virtual Incorporation: A Lawyer’s Guide to the Formation of Virtual Corporation. Chicago: ABA Publishing.
  • Varadarajan, R., Yadav, M.S. & Shankar, V. (2008). First-mover advantage in an Internetenabled market environment: conceptual framework and propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (3), 293–308.
  • Villani, E. (2013). Crowdfunding. The new buzzword in Capital Formation. Kevin M. McGovern Family Center for Venture Development in the Life Sciences [Online]. Available at: http://www.mcgoverncenter.cornell.edu/docs/Crowdfunding%20%5BVillani%5D.pdf (Accessed: 19 February 2014).
  • Wardrop, R., Zhang, B., Rau, R. & Gray, M. (2015). Moving Mainstream. The European Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report. Cambridge: Wardour Drury House.
  • Witt, P. & Brachtendorf, G. (2006). Staged Financing of Start-ups. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 20 (2), 185–203.
  • Woodward, R., Wojnicka, E., & Pander, W. (2012). Innovation Systems and Knowledge- Intensive Entrepreneurship: a Country Case Study of Poland. Case Network Studies and Analyses No. 446 [Online]. Available at: http://www.case-research.eu/sites/default/files/publications/CNSA_2012_446.pdf (Accessed: 29 August 2015).
  • Yong, L. & Zahra, S. (2012). Formal institutions, culture, and venture capital activity: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 27 (1), 95–111.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
1644-9584
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-3149955b-3161-4918-b7c4-140825a6c2c8
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.