Przemoc skrajnej prawicy w Polsce. Analiza strategicznego pola ruchu społecznego

• Authors: Płatek Daniel

Title variants

EN

Violence of the Extreme Right in Poland. Analysis of the Social Movement Strategic Field

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Podejście agregacyjne to obecnie dominujący sposób prowadzenia analiz w badaniach nad działaniami zbiorowymi i ruchami społecznymi. W obrębie metod agregacyjnych działania analizuje się jako sumę wartości odrębnych elementów (zmiennych). Artykuł zawiera praktyczną ilustrację technik uzupełnienia agregacyjnych metod badawczych metodami relacyjnymi w socjologii ruchów społecznych. Autor opisuje wyniki badania, którego przedmiotem był ruch skrajnej prawicy w Polsce, w latach 1990–2013. Po zaobserwowaniu zmian czasowych w wariancji przemocy stosowanej przez ruch skrajnej prawicy, zaistniała potrzeba zastosowania bardziej precyzyjnego narzędzia, które umożliwiłoby wyjaśnienie, dlaczego w określonym przedziale czasowym skala przemocy istotnie zmalała. Regresja logistyczna okazała się tylko częściowo pomocna w ustaleniu warunków, w których przemoc ze strony skrajnej prawicy słabnie. Dopiero relacyjne ujęcie pozwoliło uchwycić najważniejsze cechy „przestrzeni” (pola), w jakiej funkcjonuje ruch skrajnej prawicy w Polsce.

EN

The aggregative approach is currently a dominant way of conducting analyses on collective actions and social movements. Within aggregative methods, actions are analyzed as a sum of the values of separate elements, or variables. The article offers an empirical illustration of the techniques for complementing aggregative research methods with relational methods in the sociology of social movements. It presents the study on the extreme right movement in Poland covering the period between 1990 and 2013. The findings have indicated the changes in the variance of violence perpetrated by the extreme right movement overtime. They have created a need for a more precise tool capable of explaining why the scale of violence have decreased significantly over a specific period. Relational approach has allowed to capture the most important features of the ‘space’, or field, in which the extreme right movement in Poland functions.

Keywords

PL

ruchy społeczne; teoria pola; analiza sieci

EN

social network analysis; social movements; field theory

• Publisher: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Studia Socjologiczne
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 4(239)
• Pages: 123-153

Contributors

author

Płatek Daniel

• Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN

References

• Barrat, Alain, Marc Barthelemy, Romualdo Pastor-Satorras, Alessandro Vespignani. 2004. The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 11: 3747–3752. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0400087101.
• Bellotti, Elisa. 2011. The Social Processes of Production and Validation of Knowledge in Particle Physics: Preliminary Theoretical and Methodological Observations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10: 148–59. DOI: 10.1016/j. sbspro.2011.01.018.
• Borgatti, Steve, Martin Everett, Lynton Freeman. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
• Bourdieu, Pierre, Loïc J.D. Wacquant. 2001. Zaproszenie do socjologii refleksyjnej. Przekład Anna Sawisz. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
• Bourdieu, Pierre, Loïc J.D. Wacquant. 2004 [2001]. Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Broadbent, Jeffrey. 2003. Movement in Context: Thick Networks and Japanese Environmental Protest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Brykczyński, Paweł. 2017. Gotowi na przemoc. Mord, antysemityzm i demokracja w międzywojennej Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
• Caiani, Manuela, Donatella della Porta, Claudius Wagemann. 2012. Mobilizing on the Extreme Right. Germany, Italy, and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Diani, Mario. 1995. Green networks: a structural analysis of the Italian environmental movement. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.
• Diani, Mario. 2007. Networks and Participation. W: D. A. Snow, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 339–59.
• Diani, Mario. 2015. The Cement of Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• DiMaggio, Paul J., Walter W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 2: 147–60. DOI: 10.2307/2095101.
• Dobratz, Betty A., Lisa K.Waldner. 2006. The White Power Movement in the U.S. The Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 34, 1: 1–210.
• Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 2: 281–317. DOI: 10.1086/231209.
• Everett, Martin. 2016. Centrality and the Dual Projection Approach for Two Mode Social Network Data. Methodological Innovations, 9: 1–8. DOI: 10.1177/2059799116630662.
• Everett, Martin, Steven Borgatti. 1999. Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks 21: 375–395.
• Everett, Martin, Steven Borgatti. 2013. The Dual Projection Approach for Two Mode Networks. Social Networks, 35, 2: 204–210. DOI: 10.1177/2059799116630662.
• Fligstein, Neil, Doug McAdam. 2011. Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory, 29, 1: 1–26.
• Fligstein, Neil, Doug McAdam. 2015. A Theory of Fields. Oxford New York Auckland: Oxford University Press.
• Franzosi, Roberto. 1987. The Press as a Source of Socio-Historical Data: Issues in the Methodology of Data Collection from Newspapers. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 20, 1: 5–16. DOI: 10.1080/01615440.1987.10594173.
• Franzosi, Roberto. 2010. Quantitative Narrative Analysis. SAGE.
• Gentile, Peter. 1999. Radical Right Protest in Switzerland. W: D. Rucht, R. Koopmans, F. Niedhardt, eds. Acts of Dissent. New Developments in the Study of Protest. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 227–252.
• Greenacre, Michael., 1993. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. London: Academic Press.
• Greenacre, Michael, Jorg Blasius. 1994. Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences. Recent Developments and Applications. London: Academic Press.
• Hanneman, Robert A., Mark Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside
• Kontopoulos, Kyriakos M. 1993. The Logics of Social Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lipski, Józef. 2016. Idea Katolickiego Państwa Narodu Polskiego. Zarys ideologii ONR „Falanga”. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
• McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• McAdam, Doug. 1983. Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency. American Sociological Review, 48, 6: 735–54. DOI: 10.2307/2095322.
• McAdam, Doug, Robert J. Sampson, Simon Weffer, Heather MacIndoe. 2005. There Will be Fighting in the Streets’: The Distorting Lens of Social Movement Theory. Mobilization, 10, 1: 1–18. DOI: 10.17813/maiq.10.1.a62814651h028540.
• McCammon, Holly J. 2003. Out of the Parlors and into the Streets: The Changing Tactical Repertoire of the U.S. Women’s Suffrage Movements. Social Forces, 81, 3: 787–818.
• McCarthy, John D., Clark McPhail, Jackie Smith. 1996. Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review, 61, 3: 478–99. DOI: 10.2307/2096360.
• McCarthy, John D., Clark McPhail. 1998. The Institutionalization of Protest in the US. W: D. S. Meyer; S. Tarrow, eds. The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for the New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Meyer, John. 1977. The Effects of Education as an Institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83. DOI: 10.1086/226506.
• Meyer, John. 2010. World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1: 1–20. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102506.
• Minkoff, Debra C., John D. McCarthy. 2005. Reinvigorating the Study of Organizational Processes in Social Movements. Mobilization, 10, 2: 289–308. DOI: 10.17813/maiq.10.2.rp8h757h42752w76.
• Mische, Ann, Philippa Pattison. 2000. Composing a civic arena: Publics, projects, and social settings. Poetics, 27, 2: 163–94. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00024-8.
• Monge, Peter R., Noshir S. Contractor. 2003. Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Morris, Aldon D. 1981. Black Southern Student Sit-in Movement: An Analysis of Internal Organization. American Sociological Review, 46, 6: 744–67. DOI: 10.2307/2095077.
• Mueller, Carol. 1997. Media Measurement Models of Protest Event Data. Mobilization, 2, 2: 165–84. DOI: 10.17813/maiq.2.2.n043476m01q7463u.
• Newman, Michael E. J. 2001. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review, 64. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132.
• Opsahl, Tore, Filip Agneessens, John Skvoretz. 2010. Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32: 245–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006.
• Osa, Maryjane. 2001. Mobilizing Structures and Cycles of Protest: Post-Stalinist Contention in Poland, 1954-1959. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 6, 2: 211–231. DOI: 10.17813/maiq.6.2.ml4u77k2370504j0.
• Pankowski, Rafał. 2010. The Populist Radical Right in Poland. London: Routledge.
• Płatek, Daniel, Piotr Płucienniczak. 2017a. «Śmierć wrogom ojczyzny!». Przemoc zbiorowa w repertuarze działań skrajnej prawicy w Polsce, 1990–2013. Studia Socjologiczne, 2, 225: 73–107.
• Płatek, Daniel, Piotr Płucienniczak. 2017b. Mobilizing on the Extreme Right in Poland: Marginalization, Institutionalization and Radicalization. W: K. Jacobsson, E. Korolczuk, eds. Civil Society Revisited. Lessons from Poland. New York: Berghahn Books.
• Saunders, Clare. 2007. Using Social Network Analysis to Explore Social Movements: A Relational Approach. Social Movement Studies, 6, 3: 227–43. DOI: 10.1080/14742830701777769.
• Schofer, Evan, John W. Meyer. 2005. The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review, 70, 6: 898–920. DOI: 10.1177/000312240507000602.
• Tilly, Charles. 2009. Katalogi zdarzeń jako teorie. Przekład Agata Dziuban. W: A. Manterys, J. Mucha, red. Nowe perspektywy teorii socjologicznej. Kraków: Nomos.
• Wang, Dan J., Sarah A. Soule. 2012. Social Movement Organizational Collaboration: Networks of Learning and the Diffusion of Protest Tactics, 1960–1995. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 6: 1674–1722. DOI: 10.1086/664685.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24425/sts.2020.135140