PL EN


2012 | 12 | 2 | 3-17
Article title

VISUALIZED LEARNING DESIGN: THE CHALLENGES OF TRANSFERRING AN INNOVATION IN THE CYPRUS EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The adoption of a new Learning Design methodology, especially when it is related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), by teachers in Cyprus is a challenge. This paper describes and evaluates the process of transferring such a Learning Design innovation, as developed by the UK Open University, to elementary and secondary education teachers in the Cyprus context. The paper also analyses the impact of such a Learning Design on teacher practice and considers barriers obstructing its uptake. Lastly, suggestions for future implementation are given in the conclusion.
Year
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
3-17
Physical description
Contributors
  • Cyprus Pedagogical Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
References
  • Agostinho, S. (2006).The use of visual learning design representation to document and communicate teaching ideas.In Proceedings of ASCILTE 2006, Sydney.
  • Agostinho, S. (2008). Learning design representations to document, model and share teaching practice. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies Vol. 1. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, , pp. 1–19.
  • Brasher, A., Conole, G., Cross, S., Weller, M., Clark, P. and White, J. (2008).CompendiumLD – a tool for effective, efficient and creative learning design. In: Proceedings of the 2008 European LAMS Conference: Practical Benefits of Learning Design, 25-27 June 2008, Cadiz, Spain.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7thed.). London: Routledge
  • Conole, G. (2008). Capturing practice: the role of mediating artefacts in learning design. In Lockyer, L., Bennett, S. Agostinho, S. and Harper, B. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies. Hersey PA: IGI Global, pp. 187-207.
  • Conole, G., Brasher, A., Cross, S., Weller, M., Clark, P. & White, J. (2008). Visualising learning design to foster and support good practice and creativity. Educational Media International, 45(3), 177-194.
  • Donald, C., Blake, A., Girault, I., Datt, A. & Ramsay, E. (2009). Approaches to learning design: past the head and the hands to the HEART of the matter. Distance Education, 30(2), 179-199
  • Galley, R., Conole, G., Dalziel, J. & Ghiglione, E. (2010).Cloudworks as a ‘pedagogical wrapper’ for LAMS sequences: supporting the sharing of ideas across professional boundaries and facilitating collaborative design, evaluation and critical reflection. LAMS European Conference, Oxford, 15-16th July 2010.
  • Goodyear, P & Retalis, S. (2010). Learning, Technology and Design. In Goodyear, P and Retalis, S. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning Patterns and Institutional Change vol.2. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 1-28.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 967-983.
  • Masterman, E. (2008). Activity Theory and the Design of Pedagogic Planning Tools. In Lockyer, L., Bennett, S. Agostinho, S. and Harper, B. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, pp. 209-227.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Richards, J.C. (1998). What’s the use of lesson plans? In Richards, J.C. (ed.), Beyond Training. New York: Cambridge University Press., pp. 103-121
  • Rodriguez, A.J. (2005) Teachers’ resistance to ideological and pedagogical change: Definitions, theoretical frameworks and significance. In Rodriguez, J.A. and Kitchen, R.S. (eds.), Preparing Mathematics and Science Teachers for Diverse Classrooms: Promising Strategies for Transformative Pedagogy. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  • Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Velada, R., Caetano, A., Michel, J. W., Lyons, B. D. & Kavanagh, M. J. (2007). The effects of training design, individual characteristics and work environment on transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development. 11(4), 282-294.
  • Vrasidas, C., McIsaac, M. (2001).Integrating technology in teaching and teacher education: Implications for policy and curriculum reform. Educational Media International, 38(2), 127-132.
  • Waters, S.H., & Gibbons, A.S (2004). Design languages, notation systems, and instructional technology: A case study. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52(2), 57-68.
  • Wegner, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yin, R.K. (2003).Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rded.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-32731ea2-fe77-4f87-bd7e-add33bd1d1aa
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.