Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2016 | 16 | 3 | 37-51

Article title



Title variants

Languages of publication



This paper aims to explore how language instructors teach with a synchronous multimodal setup (Skype). It reports on findings from research which evaluated how teachers use technologies to enable them to work in distance learning contexts. A total of 124 teachers (86 female and 38 male), offering online private lessons, were asked to complete a survey in which they were asked to describe the advantages and disadvantages of Skype, as well as to enumerate functions they consider are missing in this tool. They were also invited to share their opinions about most efficient models of language learning and teaching. The results show Skype is, on the whole, judged by teachers as a valuable tool in the context of distance language learning. Its use in teaching, nevertheless, has some limitations, which stem from various factors, such as IT infrastructure weaknesses (e.g. interrupted connections), lack of some functions (e.g. supervising the content of the learner’s screen) or the specific nature of contact with the interlocutor (the lack of a possibility to interact in a common space).









Physical description


  • Maria Curie-Skłodowska University


  • Develotte, C., Guichon, N., & Vincent, C. (2010). The use of the webcam for teaching a foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment. ReCALL, 22(3), 293-312.
  • Eakin, A. (2012). The use of SKYPE in the World language classroom and its effects on participation and collaboration. The TFLTA Journal, 3, 20-33.
  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2005). Emerging technologies: Skype and podcasting: Disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 9-12.
  • González-Gómez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodríguez, Ó., & Alonso, M. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 58(1), 283-290.
  • Goodfellow, R., Jefferys, I., Milest, T., & Shirra, T. (1996). Face-to-face language learning at a distance? A study of a videoconference try-out. ReCALL, 8(2), 5-16.
  • Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116-137.
  • Hashemi, M., & Azizinezhad, M. (2011). The capabilities of Oovoo and Skype for language education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 50-53.
  • Jauregi, K., & Bañados, E. (2008). Virtual interaction through video-web communication: A step towards enriching and internationalizing language learning programs. ReCALL, 20(2), 183-207.
  • Johnson, R. (2011). Gender differences in e-learning: Communication, social presence, and learning outcomes. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 23(1), 79-94.
  • Jones, R. (2004). The problem of context in Computer Mediated Communication. In P. Levine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse & Technology Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 20-33). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Lamy, M., & Hampel, R. (2007). Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lee, L. (2007). One to one desktop videoconferencing for developing oral skills: Prospects in perspective. In R. O’Dowd (Ed.), Online Intercultural Exchange (pp. 281-286). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Licoppe, C., & Relieu, M. (2007). Présentation. Réseaux, 144(5), 9-22.
  • O’Dowd, R. (2006). The use of videoconferencing and e-mail as mediators of intercultural student EthnoFigurey. In J. Belz & S. Thorne (Eds.), Computer-mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education (pp. 86-120). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
  • Oviatt, S., Coulston, R., & Lunsford, R. (2004). When do we interact multimodally? Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces - ICMI '04, 129-136.
  • Putkiewicz, E. (2005). Korepetycje - szara strefa edukacji. Analizy i Opinie, 1-7.
  • Rovai, A., & Baker, J. (2005). Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 31-44.
  • Ruhleder, K., & Jordan, B. (2001). Co-constructing non-mutual realities: Delay-generated trouble in distributed interaction. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 10(1), 113-138.
  • Taillefer, L., & Munoz-Luna, R. (2014). Developing oral skills through Skype: A language project analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 260-264.
  • Tian, J., & Wang, Y. (2010). Taking language learning outside the classroom: Learners' perspectives of eTandem learning via Skype. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 181-197.
  • Wang, Y. (2004). Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 90-121.
  • Wang, Y. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(1), 122-145.
  • Wang, Y. (2007). Task design in videoconferencing-supported Distance Language Learning. CALICO Journal, 24(3), 591-630.
  • Weissberg, J. (1999). Présences à distance. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  • Zähner, C., Fauverge, A., & Wong, J. (2000). Task-Based Language Learning via audiovisual networks. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 186-203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.