Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | Volume 6 (2018) Issue No. 2: Economic Growth, Innovations and Lobbying | 33-46

Article title

Self-service as a motivation factor for innovative service

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Self-service as an innovative service attracts many opinions on the needs, use, comfort and opportunities of the future. Scientists recognise the advantages of self-service over traditional service and are carrying out research on how to motivate consumers to switch to self-service. This paper analyses the application of motivation for the consumer self-service option. The objective is, based on a theoretical concept of self-service as an innovative service, to identify the reasons for the choice of self-service. The theoretical part of the paper provides an analysis of the essence of self-service as an innovative service. The analysis is based upon the results of empirical research in March 2012 in Lithuania (N=112). The paper identifies the factors that influence consumer motivation for the choice of self-service according to an online survey. It turned out that companies which offer self-service as an innovative service are modifying consumer behaviour by liberating consumers and motivating them to act.

Contributors

References

  • Bitner, M.J. (2001), Guru’s view. Service and technology: opportunities and paradoxes, Managing Service Quality, 11(6): 375-379
  • Bitner, J.M., Meuter, L.M., Brown, S. (2000), Technology infusion in service encounters, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1): 138.
  • Bitner, J.M., Meuter, L.M., Ostrom, L.A. (2002), Implementing successful self-service technology. Academy of Management Executive, 16 (4): 96-107.
  • Bivainis, J., Drejeris, R. (2009), Verslas: teorija ir praktika. Naujų paslaugų technologijos tinkamumo daugiakriterinis vertinimas, 10(2): 93-106.
  • Bowen, D.E. (1986), Managing customers as human resources in service organisations, Human Resource Management, 25(3): 371-383.
  • Chang, C. (2011). The influence of user’s trait on public e-service usage: a self-service technology perspective, Waseda University Blgd. Tokijas: Canadian Center of Science and Education, 7(7).
  • Dabholkar, P.A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality, International Journal of Research in Marketing, (13): 29-51.
  • Ding, X., Verma, R., Iqbal, Z. (2007), Self-service technology an online financial service choice, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18 (3): 246-269.
  • Featherman, M.S., Pavlou, P.A. (2003), Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59: 451-474.
  • Fitzsimmons, A.J., Fitzsimmons, J.M. (2011), Service management: Operations, strategy, information, technology, Niujorkas: McGraw-Hill.
  • Frambach, R.T., Roest, H.C.A. (2007), The impact of consumer Internet experience on channel preference and usage intentions across the different stages of the buying process, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2): 26-41.
  • Harris, K.E., Grewal, D., Mohr, L.A., Bernhardt, K.L. (2006), Consumer responses to service recovery strategies: The moderating role of online versus offline environment, Journal of Business Research, 59: 425-431.
  • Hoffman, K.D., Bateson, J.E.G. (2001), Essentials of services marketing: Concepts, strategies and cases (2nd edition), Florida: Harcourt.
  • Huettinger, M., Čubrinckas, V. (2011), Unmanned bonds: The impact on self-automated service on consumer loyalty, Engineering Economics Journal, 22(2): 203-213.
  • Kardelis, K. (2005), Mokslinių tyrimų metodologija ir metodai, Šiauliai: Liucilijus.
  • Karlof, B., Lovingsson, F. (2006), Vadybos koncepcijos ir modeliai nuo A iki Z, Vilnius: Verslo žinios.
  • Komiak, S.Y.X., Wang, W., Benbasat, I. (2005), Trust building in virtual salepersons versus in human salespersons: Similarities and differences, E-Service Journal, 3(3): 49-63.
  • Kotler, P. (1994), Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control (8th edition), Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
  • Lovelock, Ch.H., Robert F. Young, R.F. (1979), Look to consumers to increase productivity, Harvard Business Review, 57: 168-178.
  • Melnikas, B., Jokūbavičius, A., Strazdas, R. (2000), Inovacijų vadyba, Vilnius: Technika.
  • Parasuraman, A. (2002), Guru’s view. Service quality and productivity: A synergistic perspective, Managing Service Quality, 12(1): 6-9.
  • Parasuraman, A. (1996), Understanding and leveraging the role of customerservice in external, interactive and internal marketing, Frontiers in Service Conference, Nashville, TN, 41.
  • Parida, A., Chattopadhay, G. (2007), Methodology and theory: Development of a multi-criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM), Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 13(3): 241-258.
  • Reid, R.A. (2007), Applying the TOC five-step focusing process in the service sector: A banking subsystem, Managing Service Quality, 17(2): 209-234.
  • Rothe, J.T., Harvey, M.C., Jackson, C.E. (1997), The marketing audit: Five decades later, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 5(3): 1-16.
  • Rust, R.T., Chung, T.S. (2006), Marketing models of service and relationships, Marketing Science, 25(6): 560-580.
  • Tidikis, R. (2003), Socialinių mokslų tyrimų metodologija. Vilnius.
  • Zeithaml, V.A., Bitner, M. J. (2000), Services marketing – integrating customer focus across the firm. Boston. Irwin: McGraw-Hill. p. 322.
  • Zeithaml, V.A. (2002), Service excellence in electronic channels, Managing Service Quality, 12(3): 135-139.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-32a635fd-6697-40a9-b531-9af1f9726939
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.