PL EN


2012 | 12 | 1 | 20-37
Article title

A PILOT STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL USE OF TOMATIS METHOD TO IMPROVE L2 READING FLUENCY

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This was a pilot study that used the Tomatis Method to see the effects it had on L2 reading fluency in a group of Taiwanese learners. Eight volunteers participated in this study undertaking 40-hours of before-and-after-experimental treatments. The results from the analysis showed that the participants had significant improvements in the areas of fluency, tone, stress, and intelligibility. However, there was not a significant improvement in pronunciation. This study concludes that the Tomatis Method seemed to help participants improve their reading fluency as well as increase the levels of confidence and motivation when learning the target language.
Keywords
Year
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
20-37
Physical description
Contributors
References
  • Crosson, A., & Lesaux, N. K. (2009). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to
  • comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English. Read Writ, 23: 475-494.
  • du Plessis, W.F & Van Jaarsveld, P.E. (1988). Audio-Psycho-Phonology: A comparative outcome study
  • on anxious primary school pupils. South African Journal of Psychology, 18: 144-151.
  • du Plessis, W., Burger, S., Munro, M., Wissing, D., & Nel, W. (2001). Multimodal enhancement of
  • culturally diverse, young adult musicians: a pilot study involving the Tomatis method. South African Journal of Psychology, 31(3): 35-42.
  • Durgunoglu, A. Y. (2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for
  • language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52: 189–204.
  • Durgunoglu, A., Nagy, W., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological
  • awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85: 453–465.
  • Geva, E., & Wang, M. (2001). The development of basic reading skills in children: A cross-language
  • perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21: 182–204.
  • Gilmor, T. (1999). The efficacy of the Tomatis Method for children with learning and communication
  • disorders: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Listening, 13: 12-23.
  • Hsieh, S. M. (2006). Problems in preparing for the English impromptu speech contest. Regional
  • Language Centre Journal, 37(2): 216-235.
  • Hinkel, E. (2001). Building awareness and practical skills for cross-cultural communication in
  • ESL/EFL. In M. Celce-Murcia (ed.). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, pp. 443-458.
  • Joly-Pottuz, B., Mercier, M., Leynaud, A., & Habib, M. (2008). Combined auditory and articularory
  • training improves phonological deficit in children with dyslexia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18 (4): 402-429.
  • Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a
  • little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21: 85-97.
  • Kang, Y. (2009). The role of phonological awareness in Korean elementary EFL learners’ word
  • reading. English Teaching, 64(2): 29-45.
  • Kershner, J. R., Cummings, R.L., Clarke, K.A., Hadfield, A.J., & Kershner, B.A. (1990). Two-year
  • evaluation of the Tomatis Listening Training Program with learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13 (1): 43 – 53.
  • Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. In R.
  • B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (eds.). Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (5th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association, pp. 412–453.
  • Martin-Chang, S. Y., & Gould, O. N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: exploring differential links to
  • vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 31: 273-284.
  • Manyak, P. C., & Bauer, E. B. (2009). English vocabulary instruction for English learners. The
  • Reading Teacher, 63(2): 174-176
  • McQuiston, K., O’Shea, D., McCollin, M. (2008). Improving phonological awareness and decoding
  • skills of high school students from diverse backgrounds. Preventing School Failure, 52(2): 67-70.
  • Neysmith-Roy, J.M. (2001). The Tomatis Method with severly autistic boys: Individual case studies of
  • behavioral changes. South African Journal of Psychology, 31(1): 19-26.
  • Qian, D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading
  • performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52: 513-536.
  • Rasinski, T. V., & Hoffman, J. V. (2003). Theory and research into practice: Oral reading in the school
  • literacy curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38: 510–522.
  • Rasinski, T., Homan, S., & Biggs, M. (2009). Teaching reading fluency to struggling readers: method,
  • materials, and evidence. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25: 192-204.
  • Ricketts, J., Nation, K. & Bishop, D. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading
  • skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(3): 235–257.
  • Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban,
  • first grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42: 460–466.
  • Ross-Swain, D. (2007). The effects of auditory stimulation on auditory processing disorder: A summary
  • of the findings. The International Journal of Listening, 21(2): 140-155.
  • Shohamy, E. (1985). A Practical Handbook in Language Testing for the Second Language Teacher.
  • Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early
  • reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 307-342.
  • Stutt, H.A. (1983). The Tomatis Method: A Review of Current Research. Montreal: McGill University.
  • Thompson, B. M., & Andrews, S. R. (2001). An historical commentary on the physical effects of music:Tomatis, Mozart and Neuropsychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavior Science, 35(3): 174-188
  • Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2001). Emergent literacy skills, early instruction, and individual
  • differences as determinants of difficulties in learning to read: The case for early intervention. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Early Literacy. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 295-321.
  • Wang, Y. C. (2003). Communication-orientation in Freshman English curriculum: A new response.
  • The Proceeding of the 12th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Public of China. Taipei: Crane Publishing, pp. 588-598.
  • Wiley, H., & Deno, S. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English
  • learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26(4): 207–214.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-33d5b2a1-f807-47ea-b0cc-01ad951fc99c
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.