PL EN


2017 | 20 | 71-88
Article title

Passing on Wisdom. Plato on Wisdom and Memory

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
By means of an analysis of the tension between orality and literacy the following paper tries to discover how Plato understood the task of transmit­ting wisdom. Considering his vehement critique both of poetry and of writing, a sharper understanding of the nature of Platonic wisdom came about. Wisdom seems to be beyond all appearances and can be achieved only through dialogue within meaningful relationships.
Keywords
Year
Issue
20
Pages
71-88
Physical description
Contributors
References
  • Bury R. G., 1922, Plato VII, London.
  • Cornford F. M., 1957, From Religion to Philosophy. A Study on the Origins of Western Speculation, London.
  • Derrida J., 1981, Dissemination, transl. B. Johnson, London.
  • Firth F. M., 1904, The Golden Verses of Pythagoras and Other Pythagorean Frag­ments, Krotona–Hollywood.
  • Fowler H. N., 1926, Plato I, London.
  • Frentz Th., 2006, ‘Memory, Myth, and Rhetoric in Plato’s “Phaedrus”’, Rhetoric Society Quaterly 36/3, pp. 243–262, [online:] http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/02773940500511546.
  • Griswold Ch., 1981, ‘Self-Knowledge and the <ἰδέα> of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 86/4, pp. 477–494.
  • Griswold Ch., 1996, Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus, Philadelphia.
  • Griswold Ch., 2014, ‘Plato on Rhetoric and Poetry’, [in:] The Stanford Encyclope­dia of Philosophy.
  • Havelock E., 1963, Preface to Plato, London–Cambridge, MA.
  • Heinrichs A., 2003, ‘<Hieroi Logoi> and <Hieroi Bibloi>: The (Un)Written Mar­gins of the Sacred in Ancient Greece’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 101, pp. 207–266.
  • Notopoulos J., 1938, ‘Mnemosyne in Oral Literature’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Phil. Association 69, pp. 465–493.
  • Obryk M., 2012, Unsterblichkeitsglaube in den griechischen Versinschriften, Berlin–Boston.
  • Parry M., 1971, The Making of Homeric Verse, Oxford.
  • Robb K., 1994, Literacy and Paideia in Ancient Greece, New York – Oxford.
  • Szlezák Th., 1992, ‘Was heißt <Dem Logos zu Hilfe kommen>? Zur Struktur und Zielsetzung der platonischen Dialoge’, [in:] Understanding the Phaedrus, Proceedings of the II Symposium Platonicum, L. Rossetti (ed.), Sankt Augu­stin, pp. 93–107.
  • Thissen H. J., 2002, ‘Ägyptologische Randbemerkungen’, Rheinisches Museum 145, pp. 46–61.
  • Vernant J.-P., 2006, Myth and Thought among the Greeks, transl. J. Ford, J. Lloyd, New York.
  • Wöhrle G., 1993, ‘War Parmenides ein schlechter Dichter?’, [in:] W. Kullmann, J. Althoff, Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur, Tübingen, pp. 167–180.
  • Zalta E. N. (ed.), [online:] <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/ plato-rhetoric/>.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-345c181b-d2ef-4a68-bc61-fc7ff508dc45
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.