2011 | 4(5) | 133-156
Article title

Estimation of Losses Due to the Existence of Monopolies in Urban Bus Transport in Poland

Title variants
Languages of publication
The aim of this paper is to present the different approaches to demonopolisation used in Polish and European urban public transport, compare the efficiency of these models which have proven popular in Poland as well as to estimate the total losses incurred due to the high monopolisation of Polish public transport. The methodology of the research is based on econometric modelling (Stochastic Frontier Analysis) and on a survey conducted by the author among Public Transport Authorities. The author proves that the modern London model (competition for the market) is more efficient in Polish conditions than the classic German one (communal monopoly). The very popular in Poland combination of the two above formulas – the co-existence of a Public Transport Authority with a monopolistic publicly owned operator – is surprisingly the least efficient. Total losses due to the existence of monopolies in Polish urban bus transport are estimated for the year 2007 at the level of 10-14% of its total budget (ca. 117-149 m EURO/year). In some cities, the losses can be as high as 20-25% of the total remuneration to the public bus operator. In others, public monopolists can be as efficient as private operators in the competitive model.
Le but de cet article est de présenter les approches différentes vers la demonopolisation du transport en commun urbain polonais et européen, comparer l’efficacité de ces modèles, populaires en Pologne, aussi qu’estimer les pertes totales résultant de la monopolisation du transport en commun en Pologne. La méthode de l’analyse est fondée sur la modélisation économétrique (Stochastic Frontier Analysis) et sur l’enquête réalisée par l’auteur parmi les autorités responsable de transport. L’auteur prouve que le modèle moderne de Londres (concurrence pour le marche) est plus efficace dans les conditions polonaises que le modèle allemand (monopole communal). La combinaison de deux modèles, très populaire en Pologne, reposant sur la coexistence d’une autorité responsable de transport avec un opérateur publique, est une solution la moindre efficace.
Physical description
  • Department of Transport, College of Management and Finance, Warsaw School of Economics
  • Beck A., ‘Experiences with Competitive Tendering of Bus Services in Germany’ (2010) Transport Reviews 1-27.
  • Coelli T., A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1, Armidale 1996.
  • Coelli T., Pasada Rao D., O’Donnell C., Battese G., An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Springer, New York 2005.
  • D’arcier B., How to Improve the Financial Situation of Urban Public Transport? The French Case, 11th Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport Proceedings, Delft 2009.
  • Greene W,. Limped version 9.0, Econometric modelling guide, vol. 2, Plainview 2007.
  • Greene W., Econometric Analysis, 7th Edition, Prentice Hall 2011.
  • Komunikacja miejska w liczbach [Public Transport in Numbers](2007) 2.
  • Miller D., ‘Differences Among Cities, Differences Among Firms, and Costs of Urban Bus Transport’ (1970) 1 The Journal of Industrial Economics.
  • Nazarko J., Chrabołowska J., ‘Benchmarking w ocenie efektywności krajowych spółek dystrybucyjnych energii elektrycznych’ [‘Benchmarking in efficiency assessment of domestic electricity distribution companies’] [in:] K. Jajuga, M. Walesiak (eds), Taksonomia 12, Klasyfikacja i analiza danych – teoria i zastosowania [Taxonomy 12. Classification and data analysis – theory and application], Wrocław 2005.
  • Osiewalski J., Osiewalaska A., ‘Ocena efektywności kosztowej bibliotek akademickich na podstawie danych przekrojowo-czasowych’ [‘Efficiency assessment of academic libraries based on cross-sectional time-series data’] (2005) 628 Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie/
  • Smith, P. Wheat, A quantitative study of train operating companies cost and efficiency trends 1996 to 2006: Lessons for future franchising policy, London 2007.
  • Tomanek R., Konkurencyjność transportu miejskiego [Competitiveness of public transport], Katowice 2002.
  • Tomanek R., Mazur B., Raport na temat wsparcia dla sektora transportu publicznego w ramach programów operacyjnych współfinansowanych ze środków Unii Europejskiej [Report on the support for public transport sector within EU co-financed operational projects], Katowice 2009, p. 19-21.
  • Velde van der D. et. al., Contracting in urban public transport, inno-V, Amsterdam 2008.
  • Walter M., Some Determinants of Cost Efficiency in German Public Transport. 11th Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport Proceedings, Delft 2009.
  • White P., Public transport. Its planning, management and operation,London, New York 2002.
  • Wolański M., Efektywność ekonomiczna demonopolizacji komunikacji miejskiej w Polsce [Efficiency of demonopolisation of urban public transport in Poland], Warszawa 2011.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.