PL EN


2017 | 27 | 2 | 91-111
Article title

Valuing managerial flexibility: An application of real-option theory to steel industry investments

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
In the steel industry which is subject to significant volatility in its output prices and market demands for different ranges of products the diversification of production can generate important value for switch real options. Therefore, a common practice is to invest in various assets, thus generating the possibility of diversification of production and valuable switch options. The incremental benefit of product switch options in steel plant projects has been assessed. Such options are valued using the Monte Carlo simulation and modeling the prices of and demand for steel products as geometric Brownian motion (GBM). Our results show that this option can generate a significant increase in the net present value (NPV) of metallurgical projects.
Year
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
91-111
Physical description
Contributors
author
References
  • BASTIAN-PINTO C., BRANDÃO T., HAHN W.J., Flexibility as a source of value in the production of alternative fuels. The ethanol case, Energy Economics, 2009, 31 (3), 411–422.
  • BASTIAN-PINTO C., EDUARDO L., BRANDÃO T., RAPHAEL R., OZORIO L.M., Financial Valuation of Operational Flexibilities in the Aluminum Industry Using Real Option Theory, [in:] Proc. 17th AnnualInternational Conference Real Options: Theory Meets Practice, Tokyo 2013, 1–23.
  • BJERKSUND P., EKERN S., Managing investment opportunities under price uncertainty. From last chance to wait and see strategies, Fin. Manage., 1990, 19 (3), 65–83.
  • BLANK F.F., BAYDIA T.K.N., DIAS M.A., Private infrastructure investment through public private partnership. An application to a toll road highway concession in Brazil, 13th Annual International Conference on Real Options, Braga, Portugal, Santiago, Spain, 2009, 1–21.
  • BRENNAN M.J., SCHWARTZ E.S., Evaluating natural resource investments, J. Business, 1985, 58 (2), 135–157.
  • BYKO M., TMS Plenary Symposium. Energy Reduction in the Aluminum Industry, J. Miner., Met. Mater. Soc., 2002, 54 (5), 39–40.
  • DAS S., LONG W., HAYDEN H., GREEN J., HUNT W., Energy implications of the changing world of aluminum metal supply, J. Miner., Met. Mater. Soc., 2004, 56 (8), 14–17.
  • DESSUREAULT S., KAZAKIDIS V.N., MAYER Z., Flexibility valuation in operating mine decisions using real options pricing, Int. J. Risk As. Manage., 2007, 7 (5), 656–674.
  • DIMITRAKOPOULOS R., SABOUR S.A.A., Evaluating mine plans under uncertainty. Can the real options make a difference?, Res. Pol., 2007, 32 (3), 116–125.
  • DIXIT A.K., PINDYCK R.S., Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, 1994.
  • DULEY B.D.L.J., JOHNSON B.E., As Good as It Gets. Optimal Fab Design and Deployment, IEEE Trans. Sem. Manuf., 1999, 12 (3), 281–287.
  • GLIGORIC Z., KRICAK L., BELJIC C., LUTOVAC S., MILOJEVIC J., Evaluation of underground zinc mine investment based on fuzzy-interval grey system theory and geometric Brownian motion, J. Appl. Math., 2014, article ID 914643, 1–12.
  • HERBELOT O., Option valuation of flexible investments. the case of environmental investments in the electric power industry, Department of Nuclear Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992 (https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/50208/35720932.pdf?sequence = 1).
  • HULL J.C., Options, futures and other derivatives securities, 6th Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 2006.
  • IRWIN T., Public Money for Private Infrastructure. Deciding When to Offer Guarantees, Output-Based Subsidies, and Other Fiscal Support, World Bank Working Paper, 2003 (https://openknowledge. worldbank.org/handle/10986/15117 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO).
  • MARATHE R., RYAN S.M., On the validity of the geometric Brownian motion assumption, Eng. Econ., 2005, 50 (2), 1–40.
  • MOREIRA A., ROCHA K., DAVID P., Thermopower generation investment in Brazil. Economic conditions, En. Policy, 2004, 32 (1), 91–100.
  • MUHARAM F.M., Assessing risk for strategy formulation in steel industry through real options analysis, J. Global Strat. Manage., 2011, 5 (2), 5–15.
  • MYERS S., Determinants of corporate borrowing, J. Fin. Econ., 1977, 5 (2), 147–175.
  • OZORIO L.M., BASTIAN-PINTO C., BAIDYA T.K.N., BRANDÃO T., Investment decision in integrated steel plants under uncertainty, Int. Rev. Fin. Anal., 2013, 27 (3), 55–64.
  • PINDYCK R.S., RUBINFELD D., Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, McGraw-Hill, 1998.
  • REBIASZ B., Polish steel consumption 1974–2008, Res. Pol., 2006, 31 (1), 37–49.
  • RUEY S.T., Analysis of Financial Time Series, Wiley, New York 2002.
  • SAMIS M., DAVIS G.A., Using Monte Carlo simulation with DCF and real options risk pricing techniques to analyse a mine financing proposal, Int. J. Fin. Eng. Risk Manage., 2014, 1 (3), 264–281.
  • SLADE M., Valuing managerial flexibility. An application of real-option theory to mining investments, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 2001, 41 (2), 193–233.
  • WATTANARAT V., PHIMPHAVONG P., MATSUMARU M., Demand and Price Forecasting Models for Strategic and Planning Decisions in a Supply Chain, Proc. of the School of Science of Tokai University, 2010, 3 (2), 37–42.
  • WILIMOWSKA Z., ŁUKANIUK M., Binomial model of valuation of property options, Bad. Oper. Dec., 2005 (1), 71–83 (in Polish).
  • WILCOX J.W., The P/B-ROE valuation model, Fin. Anal. J., 1984, 40 (1), 58–66.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-367d907c-ce69-4727-8f87-4ffefab6fe2b
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.