Globalizacja jako organizacja różnorodności. kulturowa koncepcja globalizacji Ulfa Hannerza a polska rzeczywistość społeczno-kulturowa

• Authors: Eliza Urwanowicz-Rojecka

Title variants

EN

Globalization as an Organization of Diversity. Ulf hannerz cultural Teory of globalization and Polish Social Reality

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

Te popularity of globalization problem within academic discourses is not free from some alarming tendencies. Firstly, it does not place too much emphasis on culture. Secondly, part of discussion on the issue lacks structure – it is usually unknown if particular theory focuses on micro-, or macro analysis. Tirdly, it is rarely clearly stated by scholars if globalization is understood as a process, a social reality or as a discourse. Ulf Hannerz in his cultural theory focuses on globalization problem understood as an organization of diversity. He highlights the intensifcation of interaction and connectivity within globalized social reality. Te scholar is also interested in global – local, centre – periphery relations. Terefore, he concentrates on the diversity issue as well as on chances, challenges and dangers connected with that phenomenon.Te aim of this article is verifcation whether Ulf Hannerz cultural theory of globalization avoids shortcomings of globalization debate. In the paper I also examine if that theory might be a useful tool for contemporary Polish social reality analysis. Is it useful for cultural and social diferences and diversity research?

Keywords

EN

CREOLIZATION; DIVERSITY; GLOBALIZATION; GLOBA; ECUMENE

• Journal: Pogranicze. Studia Społeczne
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 22
• Pages: 91-102

Contributors

author

Eliza Urwanowicz-Rojecka

• Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski, Lublin, POLAND

References

• Appadurai A. (2005), Nowoczesność bez granic. Kulturowe wymiary globalizacji, Kraków
• Giddens A. (2001), Nowoczesność i tożsamość. „Ja” i społeczeństwo w epoce późnej nowoczesności,Warszawa
• Gilarek K. (1999-2000), Proces, dyskurs czy teoria? Rzecz o naturze globalizacji, „Transformacje”nr 1-4: 19-22, 23-26
• Hannerz, U. (1992), Cultural Complexity. Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning, New York
• Hannerz U. (1999), Refections on Varieties of Culturespeak, „European Joural of Cultural Studies” nr 2(393): 393-407
• Hannerz U. (2002), Te Global Ecumene as a Network of Networks, [w:] A. Kuper (red.), Conceptualizing Society, London-New York
• Hannerz U. (2006), Powiązania transnarodowe. Kultura, ludzie, miejsca, Kraków
• Meyer J. W. (2000), Globalization. Sources and Efects on National sates and Societies, “International Sociology” nr 15(2): 233-234
• Meyer J.W., Boli J., Tomas G.M., Ramirez F.O. (2001), World Society and the Nation-State,[w:] F. J. Lechner, J. Boli (red.), Te Globalization Reader, Malden-Oxford
• Robertson R. (1990), Mapping the Global Condition: Globalization as the Central Concept,“Teo ry, Culture & Society” nr 7: 15-30
• Robertson R. (1992), Globalization. Social Teory and Global Culture, London – Tousand Oaks – New Delhi
• Robertson R. (2011), Globalization, Culture and., [w:] G. Ritzer, J.M. Ryan (red.) Te Concise Encyclopedia of Sociology, Chichester – Oxford
• Robertson R. (2012), European Cosmopolitanism and the Global Field, [w:] R. Robertson, S. Krossa (red.) European Cosmopolitanism in Question, Basingstoke
• Sztompka P. (1990), Conceptual Frameworks in Comparative Inquiry: Divergent or Convergent?,w:] M. Albrow, E. King (red.), Globalization, Knowledge and Society, London – Tousand Oaks – New Delhi
• Wallerstein I. (1990), Culture as the Ideological Battleground of the Modern World-System,“Teory, Culture & Society” nr 7(2-3): 31-55
• Zemło M. (2003), Socjologia wiedzy w tradycji interakcyjno-fenomenologicznej, Lublin
• Zybertowicz A. (2012), Trójkąt bermudzki III RP: instytucjonalizacja nieodpowiedzialności, diagnoza-bez-konsekwencji a wiedza ekskluzywna, Ogólnopolska konferencja naukowa „Wiedza a instytucjonalizacja nieodpowiedzialności”, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski, Lublin