Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 19 | 4 | 544-559

Article title

Analiza stylów i mechanizmów obronnych u osobowości typu D

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

EN
Analysis of styles and defence mechanisms in type D personality

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
The aim of this study was to investigate the defence styles of individuals with type D personality. The study involved 62 individuals: 31 were respondents diagnosed with the coronary heart disease and 31 healthy subjects (without any cardiovascular system conditions). The average age in both groups was 61 years. Three research techniques were used in the study: a survey including demographic and medical parameters; a questionnaire for the evaluation of the type D personality – DS14 designed by Denollet; Defense Style Questionnaire DSQ- 40 designed by Bond and Wesley (1996). The subjects with the distressed personality made use of all defence styles, but they chose the least adaptive the most often. The non-adaptive style, imaginatively-distorting style and self-sacrificing style were presented more frequently by individuals with the distressed personality, while the adaptive style was chosen more often by respondents not demonstrating any traits of the type D personality. Meanwhile, the non-adaptive style prevailed in both study groups. The type D personality is associated most strongly with such defence mechanisms, as: somatization, consumption activities, projection, sublimation, acting out, regression, reaction formation, social withdrawal, fantasy and isolation. The defence mechanisms of suppression and inhibition are not specific for the distressed personality.

Year

Volume

19

Issue

4

Pages

544-559

Physical description

Contributors

  • Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Gdański Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk
author
  • Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Gdański Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk
  • Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Gdański Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk

References

  • Aalto, A.M., Heijmans, M., Weinman, J., Aro, A.R. (2005). Ilness perceptions in coronary heart disease. Sociodemographic, ilness-related, and psychosocial correlates. J. Psychosom. Res., 58 (5), 393-402.
  • Basińska, M.A., Woźniewicz, A. (2013). The relation between type D personality and the clinical condition of patients suffering from psoriasis. Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii, 30 (6), 381-387.
  • Bishop, G.D. (2000). Psychologia zdrowia. Zintegrowany umysł i ciało. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Astrum.
  • Bond, M., Gardner, S.T., Christian, J., Sigal, J.J. (1983). Empirical Study of Self-rated Defense Styles. Archives of General Psychiatry, American Medical Association, 40, 333-338.
  • Bond, M., Wesley, S. (1996). Manual for the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ). Montreal: McGill University.
  • Broda, G. (2004). Choroby układu krążenia w Polsce – umieralność, http://www.poradnikmedyczny.pl/mod/archiwum/4779_choroby_uk%B3adu_kr%B1%BFenia.html
  • Denollet, J. (1998). Personality And Coronary Heart Disease: The Type-D Scale-16 (DS-16). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20 (3), 209-215.
  • Denollet, J. (2000). Type D personality. A potential risk factor refined. J Psychosomatic Research, 49, 255-266.
  • Denollet, J. (2002). Type D personality and vulnerability to chronić disease, impaired quality of life and depressive symptoms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 101.
  • Denollet, J., Schiffer, A., Spek, V. (2010). A general propensity to psychological distress affects cardiovascular outcomes: evidence from research on Type D personality profile. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 3, 546-557.
  • Denollet, J., Sys, S.U., Stroobant, N., Rombouts, H., Gillebert, T.C., Brutsaert, D.L. (1996). Personality as independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. The Lancet, 347, 417-421.
  • Grzegołowska-Klarkowska, H.J. (1986). Mechanizmy obronne osobowości. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Kramer, U. (2010). Coping and defence mechanism: What’s the difference? – Second act. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 83, 207-221.
  • Kramer, U., Roten, Y., Despland, L.M., Despland, J.N. (2009). Early change in defence mechanisms and coping in short-term dynamic psychotherapy: relations with symptoms and allience. Clin. Psychol. Psychother, 16, 408-417.
  • Łaniewska, I., Makowiecki, K.L. (1998). Co należy robić, aby uniknąć choroby niedokrwiennej serca – prewencja pierwotna. W: M. Dłużniewski (red.), Choroba niedokrwienna serca. Co lekarz wiedzieć powinien? (s. 57-66) Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Servier.
  • Marchwicki, P. (2005). Mechanizmy obronne w ujęciu psychodynamicznym. Seminare, 21, 491-507.
  • Martin, L.A., Doster, J.A., Critelli, J.W., Purdum, M., Powers, C., Lambert, P.L., Miranda, V. (2010). The Distressed Personality, Coping and Cardiovascular Risk. Stress and Health, 27, 64-72.
  • Moryś, J., Majkowicz, M., Ogińska-Bulik, N., Rynkiewicz, A. (2006). Właściwości psychometryczne kwestionariusza do diagnozy osobowości typu D (DS14) szacowane na podstawie badania pacjentów z przebytym zawałem serca. Psychiatria, 3 (2), 62-69.
  • Ogińska-Bulik, N. (2005). Osobowość typu D a konsekwencje stresu zawodowego. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 11 (1), 69-79.
  • Ogińska-Bulik, N. (2006). Czy osobowość sprzyja etiopatogenezie chorób? Nowe kierunki badań – osobowość typu D. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 2, 5-22.
  • Ogińska-Bulik, N. (2009). Osobowość typu D. Teoria i badania. Łodź: Wydawnictwo WSH-E.
  • Ogińska-Bulik, N., Juczyński, Z. (2010). Osobowość – stres a zdrowie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Difin.
  • Pakalska-Korcala, A., Zdrojewski, T., Piwoński, J., Radziwiłłowicz, P., Landowski, J., Wyrzykowski, B. (2006). Stres i niskie wsparcie społeczne jako społeczne czynniki ryzyka chorób sercowo-naczyniowych. Kardiologia Polska, 64, 80-86.
  • Ponikowski, P. (2002). ABC niewydolności serca. Serwis edukacyjny firmy Polpharma.
  • Sheridan, C.L., Radmacher, S.A. (1998). Psychologia zdrowia. Wyzwanie dla biomedycznego modelu zdrowia. Warszawa: Instytut Psychologii Zdrowia PTP.
  • Sulicka, J., Fornal, M., Gryglewska, B., Wizner, B., Grodzicki, T., (2006). Wybrane czynniki ryzyka chorób sercowo-naczyniowych u pacjentów podstawowej opieki zdrowotnej. Nadciśn. Tętn., 10 (5), 370-376.
  • Whitty, M.T. (2003). Coping and defending: age differences in maturity of defence mechanisms and coping strategies. Aging and Mental Health, 7 (2), 123-132.
  • Więcek, A. (2002). Nadciśnienie tętnicze. Informator dla chorego. Serwis edukacyjny firmy Polpharma.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-38396194-b2a9-4801-ae05-a5bb10df377d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.