The rule of law in the national and supranational context

• Authors: Kabat-Rudnicka Danuta

Title variants

PL

Praworządność w kontekście narodowym i ponadnarodowym

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the scholarly literature, we can find three different concepts that have essentially the same meaning, but which are not identical to each other. These are the English rule of law, the German Rechtsstaat and the French état de droit. Each concept is derived from specific historical, social and political context. The aim of this article is to examine the meaning and significance of the rule of law in a national and supranational context, while looking for similarities and differences. The main research problem concerns the question of how the rule of law should be understood in a non-state, i.e. a supranational context. Bearing in mind that in the case of the European Union we are dealing with a non-state context, and despite the fact that the closest concept of understanding of the rule of law applied in the European Union is the German Rechtsstaat, the author adopts the hypothesis that the most accurate narrative in the present context is the English understanding of the rule of law. The considerations and findings are to lead to a better understanding of this concept in the non-state (supranational) context, because compliance with the law, including the rule of law, by all entities (public and private, national, and European) is essential to the further existence of the European Union. The study is analytical, comparative, and explanatory.

PL

W literaturze naukowej obecne są trzy różne koncepcje, które mają zasadniczo takie samo znaczenie, a jednak nie są tożsame: angielskie rule of law, niemieckie Rechtsstaat oraz francuskie état de droit. Każda z tych koncepcji wywodzi się z określonego kontekstu historycznego, społecznego i politycznego. Celem artykułu jest przeanalizowanie znaczenia rządów prawa w kontekście krajowym i ponadnarodowym, poszukując podobieństw i różnic. Główny problem badawczy sprowadza się do pytania, jak należy rozumieć rządy prawa w kontekście niepaństwowym, tj. ponadnarodowym. Mając natomiast na uwadze fakt, że w przypadku Unii Europejskiej mamy do czynienia z kontekstem niepaństwowym oraz pomimo tego, iż rozumienie rządów prawa w Unii Europejskiej jest najbliższe niemieckiemu Rechtsstaat, przyjęto hipotezę, że najbardziej odpowiednią narracją będzie ta odpowiadająca angielskiemu rule of law. Rozważania i dokonane ustalenia mają prowadzić do lepszego rozumienia kategorii rządów prawa w kontekście niepaństwowym (ponadnarodowym), bowiem przestrzeganie prawa, w tym rządów prawa przez wszystkie podmioty (publiczne i prywatne, krajowe i europejskie) jest niezbędne dla dalszego istnienia Unii Europejskiej. Opracowanie ma charakter analityczno-porównawczy i eksplanacyjny.

Keywords

EN

Rule of law; Rechtsstaat; État de droit; European Union; Court of Justice

PL

praworządność; Rule of law; Rechtsstaat; État de droit; Unia Europejska; Trybunał Sprawiedliwości UE

• Publisher: Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Studiów Międzynarodowych, Uniwersytet Warszawski
• Journal: Przegląd Europejski
• Year: 2023
• Issue: 2(68)
• Pages: 9-26

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Kabat-Rudnicka Danuta

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie

References

• BARBER Nicholas W. (2003), The Rechtsstaat and the Rule of Law, “University of Toronto Law Journal”, vol. 53, no. 4.
• CHARLOW Robin (2014), American Constitutional Analysis and a Substantive Understanding of the Rule of Law, in: J.R. Silkenat, J.E. Hickey Jr., P.D. Barenboim (eds), The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat), New York.
• CHESTERMAN Simon (2008), An International Rule of Law?, “American Journal of Comparative Law”, vol. 56, no. 2.
• CONSTITUCIÓN ESPAÑOLA (1978), Cortes Generales «BOE» núm. 311, de 29 de diciembre de 1978, https://www.boe.es/eli/es/c/1978/12/27/(1)/con (10.10.2022).
• COSTA Pietro, ZOLO Danilo (eds) (2007), The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism, Dordrecht.
• CRAIG Paul P. (1997), Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework, “Public Law”, Autumn 1997.
• DEROSIER Jean-Philippe (2016), The uselessness of an allo-synthetic concept: “Rule of Law” and “État de Droit” from a French public law perspective, “Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies .”, vol. 57, issue 1.
• DEUTSCHER BUNDESTAG (WWW), Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 23. Mai 1949 (BGBl. S. 1), zuletzt geändert durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes zur Änderung des Grundgesetzes (Artikel 82) vom 19. Dezember 2022 (BGBl. I S. 2478), https://www.bundestag.de/gg (29.12.2022).
• DICEY Albert Venn (1982 [1889]), Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th edition, London – New York.
• ELÓSEGUI María, MIRON Alina, MOTOC Iulia (2021), The Rule of Law in Europe Recent Challenges and Judicial Responses, Cham.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2014), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: A new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law, COM(2014)158 final/2, Brussels, 19.03.2014.
• FERRAJOLI Luigi (2007), The Past and the Future of the Rule of Law, in: P. Costa, D. Zolo (eds), The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism, Dordrecht.
• GOSALBO-BONO Ricardo (2010), The significance of the rule of law and its implications for the European Union and the United States, “University of Pittsburgh Law Review”, vol. 72, no. 2. DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2010.159
• JACOBS Francis G. (2006), The Sovereignty of Law. The European Way, Cambridge.
• JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (1986) of 23 April 1986, Parti écologiste "Les Verts" v. European Parliament, Case 294/83.
• JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (1987) of 15 October 1987, Union nationale des entraîneurs et cadres techniques professionnels du football (Unectef) v. Georges Heylens and others, Case 222/86.
• JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2002) of 25 July 2002, Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. Council of the European Union, Case C-50/00 P.
• JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2004) of 29 April 2004, Commission of the European Communities v. CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA, Case C-496/99 P.
• JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2006) of 12 September 2006, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. and Others v. Commission of the European Communities, Case C-131/03 P.
• JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2008) of 3 September 2008, Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, Joined cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P.
• JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2010) of 29 June 2010, Criminal proceedings against E and F, Case C-550/09.
• JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2018) of 27 February 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v. Tribunal de Contas, Case C-64/16.
• KABAT-RUDNICKA Danuta (2020), Autonomy or Sovereignty: the Case of the European Union, “International and Comparative Law Review”, vol. 20(2), DOI: 10.2478/iclr-2020-0018
• KOCHENOV Dimitry, MAGEN Amichai, PECH Laurent (2016), Introduction: The Great Rule of Law Debate in the EU, “JCMS”, vol. 54, issue 5.
• KÖTTER Matthias, SCHUPPERT Gunnar Folke (2014), Applying the Rule of Law to Contexts Beyond the State, in: J.R. Silkenat, J.E. Hickey Jr., P.D. Barenboim (eds), The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat), New York.
• LAQUIÈZE Alain (2007), État de Droit and National Sovereignty in France, in: P. Costa, D. Zolo (eds), The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism, Dordrecht.
• LOUGHLIN Martin (2009), The Rule of Law in European Jurisprudence, European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), CDL-DEM(2009)006, Strasbourg.
• MAGEN Amichai (2016), Cracks in the Foundations: Understanding the Great Rule of Law Debate in the EU, “JCMS”, vol. 54, issue 5.
• MECKE Christoph-Eric (2019), The “Rule of Law” and the “Rechtsstaat”: A Historical and Theoretical Approach from a German Perspective, “Studia Iuridica”, tom 79, The Rule of Law: Polish-American Comparative Perspective.
• MEIERHENRICH Jens, LOUGHLIN Martin (eds) (2021), The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law, Cambridge.
• MOCKLE Daniel (1994), L'État de droit et la théorie de la rule of law, «Les Cahiers de droit», vol. 35, no. 4.
• OPINION (1985) of Mr Advocate General Mancini delivered on 4 December 1985, Parti écologiste "Les Verts" v European Parliament, Case 294/83.
• ORDER OF THE COURT (1990) of 13 July 1990, J.J. Zwartveld and others, Case C-2/88 Imm.
• PECH Laurent (2010), 'A Union Founded on the Rule of Law': Meaning and Reality of the Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of EU Law, “European Constitutional Law Review”, vol. 6, issue 3.
• PECH Laurent, PLATON Sébastien (2018), Judicial Independence Under Threat: The Court of Justice to the Rescue, “CMLR”, vol. 55, issue 6.
• REGULATION (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget, OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020.
• ROSENFELD Michel (2001), The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy, Cardozo Law School, Working Paper Series No. 36.
• ROSENFELD Michel (2005), Constitutional adjudication in Europe and the United States: paradoxes and contrasts, in: G. Nolte (ed.), European and US Constitutionalism, New York.
• SCHROEDER Werner (2021), The Rule of Law As a Value in the Sense of Article 2 TEU: What Does It Mean and Imply?, in: A. von Bogdandy, P. Bogdanowicz, I. Canor, Ch. Grabenwarter, M. Taborowski, M. Schmidt (eds), Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• SELLERS Mortimer N.S. (2014), What Is the Rule of Law and Why Is It So Important?, in: J.R. Silkenat, J.E. Hickey Jr, P.D. Barenboim (eds), The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat), New York.
• SIMON Sven (2018), Rechtskulturelle Differenzen in Europa, „AöR“, Bd. 143, Heft 4.
• STUDIA I ANALIZY Sądu Najwyższego (2019), Przyszłość Europy opartej na rządach prawa, tom VIII, Warszawa.
• STATUTE OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE (1949), London, 5 May 1949, European Treaty Series - No. 1, https://rm.coe.int/1680935bd0 (27.04.2022).
• TABOROWSKI Maciej (2019), Mechanizmy ochrony praworządności państw członkowskich w prawie Unii Europejskiej. Studium przebudzenia systemu ponadnarodowego, Warszawa.
• TAMANAHA Brian Z. (2004), On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge.
• TEEC (1957), Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:11957E (10.10.2022).
• TEU (1992) Treaty on European Union, OJ C 191, 29.7.1992.
• TEU (1997), Treaty on European Union (consolidated version), OJ C 340, 10.11.1997.
• TEU (2016), Treaty on European Union (consolidated version), OJ C 202, 07.06.2016.
• TIEDEMANN Paul (2014), The Rechtsstaat-Principle in Germany: The Development from the Beginning Until Now, in: J.R. Silkenat, J.E. Hickey Jr., P.D. Barenboim (eds), The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat), New York.
• VON BOGDANDY Armin (2010), Founding Principles, in: A. von Bogdandy, J. Bast (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law, 2nd rev. ed., Oxford.
• VON BOGDANDY Armin, IOANNIDIS Michael (2014), Systemic deficiency in the rule of law: What it is, what has been done, what can be done, “CMLR”, vol. 51, issue 1.
• VON DER PFORDTEN Dietmar (2014), On the Foundations of the Rule of Law and the Principle of the Legal State/Rechtsstaat, in: J.R. Silkenat, J.E. Hickey Jr., P.D. Barenboim (eds), The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat), New York.
• WACKS Raymond (2021), The Rule of Law Under Fire?, Oxford.
• WECK Thomas (2017), Rechtsstaat und Rechtswirklichkeit, „Recht und Politik“, vol. 53, issue 2.
• ZOLO Danilo (2007), The Rule of Law: A Critical Reappraisal, in: P. Costa, D. Zolo (eds), The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism, Dordrecht.