2010 | 26 | 58-76
Article title

Moral rights to life, both natural and non-natural: reflections on James Griffin's account of human rights

Title variants
Languages of publication
Rather than to focus upon a particular ‘right to life’, we should consider what rights there are pertaining to our lives and to our living. There are different sorts. There are, for instance, rights that constitute absences of particular duties and rights that correspond to the duties of other agents or agencies. There are also natural and non-natural rights and duties. Different people in different contexts can have different moral duties and different moral rights including rights to life. The question of the moral rights there are to and pertaining to life is considered with reference to James Griffin’s account of human rights. Also considered is the question of who or what can be a bearer of them.
Physical description
  • Glasgow Caledonian University
  • Alberto Blau, Monacada [2005] – Judith Alberto Blau and Alberto Moncada, Human Rights: Beyond the Liberal Vision, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Oxford 2005.
  • Copley, Edgar [1998] – Stephen Copley and Andrew Edgar (editors), David Hume: Selected Essays, Oxford World’s Classics, Oxford 1998: 315-330.
  • Cruft [2010] – Rowan Cruft, Two approaches to human rights, “The Philosophical Quarterly” 60 (238) 2010: 176-182.
  • Dawkins, Richard [2007] – Dawkins and Richard, The God Delusion, Black Swan, 2007.
  • Griffin [2008] – James Griffin, On Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
  • Lee [1996] – Patrick Lee, Abortion and Unborn Human Life, Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DC 1966.
  • Lipscomb, Bergh [1903-04] – A.A. Lipscomb and A.E. Bergh (editors), The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Memorial Edition, volume 8, Washington, D.C. 1903-04.
  • McLachlan [1997] – Hugh V. McLachlan, Bodies, Rights and Abortion, “Journal of Medical Ethics” 23 (3) 1997: 176-180. Reprinted in McLachlan and Swales [2007] pp. 12-20.
  • McLachlan [1998] – Hugh V. McLachlan, Justice, Rights and Health Care: A Discussion of the Report of the Commission on Social Justice, “International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy” 18 (11/12) 1998: 65-84.
  • McLachlan [2004] – Hugh V. McLachlan, Human Reproduction and Rights of Action and of Recipience, “Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics” 10 (2) 2004: 45-48. Reprinted in McLachlan and Swales [2007] pp. 214-220.
  • McLachlan [2005] Hugh V. McLachlan, Social Justice, Human Rights and Public Policy, Humming Earth, Glasgow 2005.
  • McLachlan [2008] – Hugh V. McLachlan, If life is a divine gift, so too is the means of ending it, “The Scotsman” 5th November 2008.
  • McLachlan [2009a] – Hugh V. McLachlan, Property, Bodies and Wittgenstein, “The Open Ethics Journal” (3) 2009: 28-31.
  • McLachlan [2009b] – Hugh V. McLachlan, Abortion and Dawkins' Fallacious Account of the So-called "Great Beethoven Fallacy", “Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics” 15 (2) 2009: 44-54.
  • McLachlan [2010] – Hugh V. McLachlan, Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia, “Journal of Medical Ethics” 36 (5) 2010: 306-309.
  • McLachlan, Swales [2007] – Hugh V. McLachlan and J. Kim Swales, From the Womb to the Tomb: Issues in Medical Ethics, Humming Earth, Glasgow 2007.
  • Reiman [1999] – Jeffrey Reiman, Abortion and the Ways We Value Human Life, Rowman and Littlefield, New York 1999.
  • Stretton [2000] – Dean Stretton, The Argument from Intrinsic Value: A Critique, “Bioethics” (14) 2000: 228-239.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.