PL EN


2012 | 897 | 121-134
Article title

Patent i jego znaczenie dla gospodarki

Title variants
EN
The Importance of Patent for the Economy
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The aim of the article is to show that patent – the granting of a temporary monopolistic position, which is detrimental to the economic activity, since any legally sanctioned monopoly is an obstacle to economic development – in the long term may in fact have a positive impact on economic development. Growth is possible today only when the economy is strong and can succeed in the presence of global competition, i.e. the economy based on knowledge and innovation. The European Union, in principle, uses two instruments to increase innovation: competition policy and industrial policy. However, these policies often pursue divergent goals, as competition policy aims at an undistorted form of competition, whereas industrial policy distorts competition, through the support granted to selected entities and economic sectors. Another, equally important instrument, which also seeks to promote innovation and thus the competitiveness of the economy is patent, the granting of a temporary monopoly (a legally sanctioned monopolistic position). Despite all of its shortcomings, patent is important, since it fosters innovation and enables the spread of technology. On the other hand, the single European patent, if adopted, will increase legal certainty and facilitate access to goods and technologies by lowering costs.
Contributors
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Polityki Ekonomicznej i Programowania Rozwoju, ul. Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland, kabatd@uek.krakow.pl
References
  • Aghion Ph., van Reenen J., Zingales L. [2009], Innovation and Intellectual Ownership, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 14769, Cambridge MA, March.
  • Budd L., Hirmis A.K. [2004], Conceptual Framework for Regional Competitiveness, „Regional Studies”, Vol. 38, No 9.
  • Current Challenges in Patent Information Retrieval [2011], eds M. Lupu et al., Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg.
  • Drahos P. [2010], The Global Governance of Knowledge. Patent Offices and their Clients, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • The Economics of the European Patent System. IP Policy for Innovation and Competition [2007], eds D. Guellec, van B. Pottelsberghe, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
  • EU Patent Gets Legal Affairs Committee Green Light [2011], European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs; http://www.europarl.europa.eu.
  • Europa 2020. Strategia na rzecz inteligentnego i zrównoważonego rozwoju sprzyjającego włączeniu społecznemu [2010], COM(2010) 2020.
  • The First Action Plan for Innovation in Europe. Innovation for Growth and Employment [1996], COM (96) 589 final.
  • Gaffard J.L. [2008], Innovation, Competition, and Growth: Schumpeterian Ideas within a Hicksian Framework, „Journal of Evolutionary Economics”, Vol. 18.
  • Gassmann O., Bader M.A. [2011], Patentmanagement. Innovationen erfolgreich nutzen und schützen, 3 Aufl., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Green Paper on Innovation [1995], COM (95) 688 final.
  • Handbook of The Economics of Innovation [2010], eds B.H. Hall, N. Rosenberg, Vol. 1, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, Oxford.
  • Konwencja o udzielaniu patentów europejskich (Konwencja o patencie europejskim) [2004], Dz.U. 2004, nr 79 poz. 737.
  • Jaeger T. [2010], The EU Patent: cui bono et quo vadit?, „Common Market Law Review”, Vol. 47, No 1.
  • Leslie Ch.R. [2009], Antitrust and Patent Law as Component Parts of Innovation Policy, „The Journal of Corporation Law”, Vol. 34, No 4.
  • A New Industrial Policy: Creating the Conditions for Manufacturing to Thrive [2005], Press Releases IP/05/1225, 05/10/2005; http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleases.
  • Park J.H. [2010], Patents and Industry Standards, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA, USA.
  • Peers S. [2011], The Constitutional Implications of the EU Patent, „European Constitutional Law Review”, Vol. 7, No 2.
  • Porozumienie w sprawie handlowych aspektów praw własności intelektualnej [1994], Dz.U. UE L 336/214.
  • Preparation for the Competitiveness Council of Ministers [2009], Press Releases, MEMO/09/537 http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleases.
  • Protokół nr 27 w sprawie rynku wewnętrznego i konkurencji [2009], Traktat z Lizbony zmieniający Traktat o Unii Europejskiej i Traktat ustanawiający Wspólnotę Europejską, Dz.U. 2009, nr 203, poz. 1569.
  • Rees A., Sonnenholzner M. [2000], Competition among the Regions in Euroland, „Intereconomics”, March/April.
  • Rios-Morales R., Brennan L. [2009], Ireland’s Innovative Governmental Policies Promoting Internationalization, „Research in International Business and Finance”, Vol. 23.
  • Seville C. [2009], EU Intellectual Property Law and Policy, Elgar European Law, Cheltenham UK.
  • Tilford S. [2008], Is EU Competition Policy an Obstacle to Innovation and Growth? Centre for European Reform, November.
  • Tunick M. [2009], Promoting Innovation in the European Union. On the Development of Sound Competition and Industrial Policies, Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung, Discussion Paper, C 191.
  • Unitary Patent to Boost Innovation [2011], Council of the European Union; http://www.consilium.europa.eu/showFocus.aspx?focusID=571&lang=EN.
  • Van Pottelsberghe B. [2010], Europe Should Stop Taxing Innovation, Bruegel Policy Brief, Issue 2, March.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-3d538ad5-e3e4-4f6b-a12b-2181c7aec29d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.