PL EN


2011 | 2 | 151 -166
Article title

Podobieństwa i różnice pomiędzy pełnomocnictwem substytucyjnym a upoważnieniem do zastępowania radcy prawnego

Authors
Title variants
EN
SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ATTORNEY AFTER THE SUBSTITUTIONAND THE AUTHORITYTO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
In this paper, the author will try to reveal all the similarities and differencesbetween the authorization and the power to attorney leaning law. Work includes a detailedexplanation of both concepts in a clear manner. A power of attorney (POA) and authorize trainee to the replacement of the solicitoror advocate are considerably different and yet these names are used interchangeably.Most of the professional representatives, including the courts, make a mistake with grantaccess to a trainee legal proceedings before the Court in spite of inadequate fixation.According to the author of this article, this fact stems from the fact that the trainee after the authorization granted to replace the same range of powers to represent the principallegal adviser and as a lawyer. Moreover, even if the court finds that the trainee should haveauthorization and not substitutable attorney, that he had not yet granted, it will require thetrainee to provide authorization within 7 days. This practice is mostly dictated by theeconomics of the process and the desire by the Court at the earliest settlement in the case,and the wrong names can not constitute grounds for prolonging the process. With this inmind should even mention that the principle of authority and power of substitution are thesame as the scope of the right to represent the client.
Year
Issue
2
Pages
151 -166
Physical description
Contributors
author
References
  • W.Cejsel, Prawna dopuszczalność ograniczenia pełnomocnictwa substytucyjnego, MoP nr 23/2003.
  • H.Ciepła, w: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. T. I. Komentarz do art. 1–5051”, red.
  • W.Gawrylczyk, Pełnomocnictwo procesowe, „Monitor Prawniczy” MOP 2001, nr 2.K. Piasecki, Warszawa 2006.
  • Kędziora R., Ogólne postępowanie administracyjne, Warszawa 2008.
  • Pazdan M., Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz do artykułów 1–449 [11], red. K. Pietrzykowski, t. I, Warszawa 2008.
  • Pazdan M., Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe, wyd. 10, Warszawa 2007.
  • Romańska M., Pełnomocnictwo procesowe, w: Postępowanie sądowo-administracyjne, red. T. Woś, Warszawa 2009, s. 156.
  • Zieliński A., Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz, wyd. 3, Warszawa 2008.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-3fbf4bd1-eec0-4e85-b1f5-4d531db66429
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.