Królestwo, państwo, wodzostwo czy system prawa książęcego? O formach organizacji społecznych na etapie wczesnopaństwowym kilka uwag teoretycznych

• Authors: Ciesielska Adriana

Title variants

EN

Kingdom, State, Chiefdom or the ius ducale System? A Few Theoretical Remarks on the Forms of Social Organization during the Early-State Period

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

The article constitutes an attempt to collect and specify the notions referring to various forms of social organization during the early-state period that function both in the historical and archaeological Polish contemporary literature. The authoress assumes that nowadays the clashing of two, theoretical and terminological, traditions can be observed in the scientific literature. These are: the notions like: tribe, war democracy (tribal state), state, and the ius ducale system in the Polish tradition, and the terms like chiefdom, segmentary society, early state in the Anglo-Saxon one. The existence of this multiplicity of notions is not harmful, and such a large number of terminological traditions enriches the discipline of study significantly. However, awareness of the origins of these applied terms is of great importance.

• Publisher: Muzeum Pierwszych Piastów na Lednicy
• Journal: Studia Lednickie
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 11
• Pages: 47-58

Dates

published

2012

Contributors

author

Ciesielska Adriana

• Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny UAM (Kalisz)

References

• Burbelka J. 1980. Epoki i formacje. Próba rekonstrukcji adaptacyjnej. Wrocław–Warszawa.
• Carneiro R. 1981. The Chiefdom: Precursor of the State [w:] G.D. Jones, R.R. Kantz, The Transition to Statehood in the New World. Cambridge–New York.
• Childe G. 1963. O rozwoju w historii. Warszawa.
• Claessen H.J.M. Skalník P. (red.). 1978. The Early State, the Hague.
• Clastres P. 1989. Society against the State. Essays in Political Anthropology. New York.
• Durkheim E. 1999. O podziale pracy społecznej. Warszawa.
• Earle T. 1987. Chiefdoms in Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Perspective, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 16.
• Earle T. 1991. The Evolution of Chiefdoms [w:] T. Earle (red.) Chiefdoms: Power, Economy and Ideology. Cambridge.
• Evans-Pritchard E. 1964. Tribes without Rulers: Studies in African Segmentary Systems. London.
• Fukuyama F. 2011. The Origins of Political Order. London.
• Godelier M. 1988. The Making of Great Men. Male Domination and Power among the New Guinea Baruya. Cambridge.
• Kristiansen K. 1991. Chiefdoms, State and System of Evolution [w:] T. Earle (red.) Chiefdoms: Power, Economy and Ideology. Cambridge.
• Modzelewski K. 1975. Dziedzictwo plemienne w ustroju Polski Piastowskiej, Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej, t. 23, z. 3.
• Modzelewski K. 2000. Organizacja gospodarcza państwa piastowskiego. Poznań.
• Pohl W. 1988. Die Awaren. Ein Steppenvolk im Mitteleuropa 567–822 n.Chr. Munich.
• Polanyi K. Arensberg C.M., Pearson H.W. (red.). 1957. Trade and Market in the Early Empires. Economies in History and Theory. Glencoe.
• Renfrew C. 1974. Beyond a Subsistence Economy: the Evolution of Social Organisation in Prehistoric Europe [w:] C. Moore (red.) Reconstructing Complex Societies: an Archaeological Colloquium, Ann Arbor.
• Sahlins M. 1963. Poor Man, Rich Man, Big Man, Chief: Political Types in Melanesia and Polinesia, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 5, No 3.
• Service E. 1971. Primitive Social Organization. An Evolutionary Approach. New York.
• Tatarkiewicz W. 1990. Historia filozofii, t. 3, s. 72–80. Warszawa
• Ziółkowski M., Tymowski M. (red.). 1992. Geneza i funkcjonowanie wczesnych form państwowości na tle porównawczym, Warszawa.

Identifiers

ISSN

0860-7893