EN
The author makes a critical analysis of the amendment to article 388 of the Civil Code. In his opinion, the new regulation will not only not contribute to the improvement of the exploited legal situation, but will also become the subject of numerous discrepancies. Doubts in his assessment are raised especially by the interpretation of the premise of the lack of due diligence and the proposed extension of the period of limitation under article 388 of the Civil Code. The author is also critical of giving the exploited the right to decide about the fate of the exploited contract.