Natural Capital Changes in Poland – Integrating Spatial and Economic Approach

• Authors: TELEGA Ivan , TELEGA Agnieszka

Title variants

PL

Zmiany w zasobach kapitału naturalnego Polski – ujęcie przestrzenno-ekonomiczne

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the context of decision making, the main challenge is the assessment of changes in natural capital stocks due to conversion of ecosystems for development purposes. Ecosystems are basically a spatial concept, so the natural approach is to use GIS to evaluate land cover changes. Basic economic model of competing land uses allows us to formulate the criteria of economic rationality in the management of natural capital. The goal of this paper is a preliminary application of the criteria coming from the economic model of land uses to assess changes in land cover in Poland in the years 2000-2012.

PL

Ocena zmian w zasobach kapitału naturalnego spowodowanych przekształcaniem ekosystemów jest kluczowe dla rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego. Świadczenie ekosystemów mają duży wpływ na jakość życia oraz dobrobyt społeczny. Ekosystemy są koncepcją przestrzenną, więc naturalnym podejściem jest użycie GIS do oceny zmian w pokryciu terenu. Podstawowy ekonomiczny model zmian w użytkowaniu ziemi pozwala na sformułowanie kryteriów racjonalności ekonomicznej w zarządzaniu kapitałem naturalnym. Celem pracy jest wstępne zastosowanie kryteriów wynikających z ekonomicznego modelu użytkowania gruntów w celu oceny zmian pokrycia terenu w Polsce w latach 2000-2012.

Keywords

EN

land management; ecosystem services; natural capital; Corine Land Cover; sustainability; dynamic

PL

gospodarka gruntami; świadczenia ekosystemów; kapitał naturalny; Corine Land Cover; zrównoważony rozwój; dynamiczna optymalizacja

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Opolski, Wydział Ekonomiczny
• Journal: Economic and Environmental Studies
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 44
• Pages: 907-922

Dates

published

2017-12-31

Contributors

author

TELEGA Ivan

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

author

TELEGA Agnieszka

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

redactor

Paradowska Monika

redactor

Platje Joost (Johannes)

redactor

Słodczyk Janusz

References

• Barbier, E. H. (2011). Capitalizing on Nature. Ecosystems as Natural Assets. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Bateman, I. J. Harwood, A.R.; Mace, G.M.; Watson, R.T.; Abson, D.J.; Andrews, B.; Binner, A.; Crowe, A.; Day, B.H.; Dugdale, S.; Fezzi, C.; Foden, J.; Hadley, D.; Haines-Young, R.; Hulme, M.; Kontoleon, A.; Lovett, A.A.; Munday, P.; Pascual, U.; Paterson, J.; Perino, G.; Sen, A.; Siriwardena, G.; van Soest, D.; Termansen, M. (2013). Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: Land use in the United Kingdom, Science 341: 45-50.
• Cardinale, B. J. Duffy, E.; Gonzalez, A.; Hooper, D.U.; Perrings, C.; Venail, P.; Narwani, A.; MacE, G.M.; Tilman, D.; Wardle, D.A.; Kinzig, A.P.; Daily, G.C.; Loreau, M.; Grace, J.B.; Larigauderie, A.; Srivastava, D.S.; Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59-67.
• Chiang C. A. (2000). Elements of Dynamic Optimization, Waveland Press.
• Constanza, R. Groot, R.S. de; Sutton, P.; Ploeg, S. van der; Anderson, S.J.; Kubiszewski, I.; Farber, S.; Turner, R.K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26: 152-158.
• Constanza, R.; Daly, H. E.; (1992). Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology 6 (1): 37-46.
• Costanza, R. d'Arge, R.; Groot, R.S. de; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O'Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; Raskin, R.G.; Sutton, P.; Belt van den, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.
• Daily, G.C.; (1997). Nature’s Services, Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press.
• De Groot, R.; Brander, L.; van der Ploeg, S.; Bernard, F.; Braat, L.; Christie, M.; Costanza, R.; Crossman, N.; Ghermandi, A.; Hein, L.; Hussain, S.; Kumar, P.; McVittie, A.; Portela, R.; Rodriguez, LC.; ten Brink, P. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services 1: 50 – 61.
• Diaz, S.; Fargione, J.; Chapin, F.S.; Tilman. D. (2006). Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being, PLoS Biology 4(8). Available at: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• EEA (2006). Land accounts for Europe 1990-2000. Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_11. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• EEA (2011a). Landscape fragmentation in Europe. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/landscape-fragmentation-in-europe. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• EEA (2011b). Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion. The concept of green infrastructure and its integration into policies using monitoring systems, EEA Technical report No 18/2011. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/green-infrastructure-and-territorial-cohesion. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• EEA (2013). Analysis of changes in European land cover from 2000 to 2006, Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/land-cover-2006-and-changes-1 . Accessed 6 May 2017.
• EEA (2014). Spatial analysis of green infrastructure in Europe. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/spatial-analysis-of-green-infrastructure. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• EEA (2015a). The European environment — state and outlook 2015: synthesis report. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• EEA (2015b). Land and soil losing ground to human activities. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/articles/land-and-soil-losing-ground. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• Eurostat (2016). Agricultural Land Prices and Rents data for the European Union. Available at: ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• Goldstein, J. H. Caldaroneb, G.; Kaeo Duarte, T.; Ennaanay, D.; Hannahs, N.; Mendoza, G.; Polasky, S.; Wolny, S.; Daily, G.C. (2012). Integrating ecosystem-services tradeoffs into land-use decisions. PNAS 109 (19): 7565–7570.
• Natural England (2013). Green Infrastructure – Valuation Tools Assessment. Natural England Commissioned Report NECR126. Available at: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/6264318517575680. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• Nelson, E. Mendoza, G.; Regetz, J.; Polasky, S.; Tallis, H.; Cameron, D.R.; Chan, K.M.A.; Daily, G.C.; Goldstein, J.; Kareiva, P.M.; Lonsdorf, E.; Naidoo, R.; Ricketts, T.H.; Shaw, M.R. (2009). Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7 (1): 4-11.
• TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Available at: http://www.teebweb.org/publication/mainstreaming-the-economics-of-nature-a-synthesis-of-the-approach-conclusions-and-recommendations-of-teeb/. Accessed 6 May 2017.
• The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
• Wilson, E. O. (2002). The Future of Life. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2017.44.17