PL EN


Journal
2019 | 27 | 3(107) | 117-129
Article title

Najwcześniejsza postać formalizmu Hilberta

Content
Title variants
EN
The Earliest Form of Hilbert’s Formalism
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The aim of this paper is to describe and analyze the first (1922) of a long series of Hilbert’s works in which he presented the mature version of formalism. His formalism in 1922 can be called mature because it is characterized by an explicit introduction of metamathematics. Hilbert distinguishes several levels of mathematics (not just two, as one may think — formalized mathematics and metamathematics): the level of meaningless arithmetical signs, labelled I-Z in this paper, the level of arithmetic with content (inhaltliche Arithmetik), II-T, which describes signs from level I-Z, the level of formalized mathematics, II-F (Hilbert postulated a full formalization of mathematics), and the level of metamathematics with content, III-MM, which describes signs from level II-F. Hilbert emphasized that the relation of III-MM to II-F is the same as the relation of II-T to I-Z (description, investigation). In this way, he tried to characterize metamathematics. He expected that in III-MM a consistency proof of II-F could be built, which was the aim of Hilbert’s formalism. This paper discusses Hilbert’s first proof of an auxiliary metamathematical theorem. It is indicated that, on level III-MM, Hilbert assumed a part of arithmetic from level II-T and the classical logic. Although in 1922 he did not distinguish explicitly between the finite and infinite mathematics and between the real and ideal mathematics, such a division was implicit in his study. This allows us to assume that already in 1922 Hilbert had an idea of a finitistic consistency proof of infinitistic mathematics, announced a few years later. It appears, therefore, that already in 1922 he had a very clear idea of formalism, which was presented in detail in the middle of the decade. Hilbert was also aware in 1922 that Brouwer’s objections would eventually force him to explain the issue of logical foundations of classical mathematics.
Journal
Year
Volume
27
Issue
Pages
117-129
Physical description
Contributors
  • Katedra Filozofii Logiki, Wydział Filozoficzny, Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie, ul. Kanonicza 9, 31-002 Kraków
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-46daa88b-f1bc-42d0-942b-d32127b5f027
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.